PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

ViewSonic PJD6683ws

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The ViewSonic PJD6683ws offers a 3000 lumen rating, 1280 by 800 native resolution, and a short throw lens. - ViewSonic PJD6683ws
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The ViewSonic PJD6683ws delivers a bright, high quality data image, a native 1280 by 800 resolution, and a short throw that lets you show big images from close to the screen.

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 3000 lumen rating.
    • High quality data image.
    • Short throw.
    • Light enough for portable use.
    • Long lamp life.
    • Relatively low-quality video.
    • Rainbow artifacts show relatively often, particularly with video.

ViewSonic PJD6683ws Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Built-in TV Tuner: None
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 9.5 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 3.3 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Lens Shift: None
Native Resolution: 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness: 3000 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 15000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 36 months
Warranty Parts: 36 months
Weight: 6.6 lb
Width: 11.6 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Digital

The ViewSonic PJD6683ws is a close cousin to the ViewSonic PJD6553w that I recently reviewed. In particular, both are built around a DLP chip with a WXGA (1280 by 800) resolution. Where the two differ, in part, is that the PJD6683ws offers a slightly lower brightness rating, at 3000 lumens, making it suitable for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom rather than a mid to large-size room. The other key difference, and the reason it costs more, is that it includes a short-throw lens, which lets it project a large image in a tight space. The combination makes it an Editors' Choice for short-throw WXGA projectors.

Short throw projectors, a group that also includes the Editors' Choice Optoma TW610ST, cost more than otherwise identical projectors with standard lenses. What makes them worth it, assuming you need the feature, is that they let you project large images from close to the screen.

The short throw makes it easier to get a big image in a small room, and also makes it easier to avoid shadows from anything that might get between the projector and the screen with a standard throw lens. With the PJD6683ws, I measured a 92-inch diagonal (78-inch wide) image with the projector just 40 inches from the screen.

Portability, Connections, and Setup

The PJD6683ws weighs just 6.6 pounds, making it light enough to bring with you on the road, at least occasionally, but heavy enough so it's more likely to wind up permanently in one room, or on a cart going from room to room. Note that ViewSonic doesn't supply a carrying case with the projector, so if you want to use it as a portable, you'll have to buy one separately.

Setup is typical for a short throw projector, with manual focus and no zoom. Connectors on the back panel include the expected HDMI for a computer or video source, VGA for a computer or component video, and both S-Video and composite video ports.

Brightness and Image Quality

The 3000-lumen rating is in the typical range for the PJD6683ws's price and weight class. The rating for the TW610ST, for example, is 3100 lumens. In real world use, the projector is easily bright enough to stand up to typical office lighting with a reasonably large image. In my tests, it was more than bright enough to use with a 130-inch diagonal image with moderate ambient light.

The projector also scored well on data image quality on our standard suite of DisplayMate tests. Yellow was a little dull, which is common with DLP projectors, but colors were suitably eye-catching otherwise. More important for data image quality, the image was well focused across the entire screen, maintaining crisp detail. Both black on white and white on black text were easily readable even at 6.8 points in my tests. The image was also close to rock solid with an analog VGA connection, even with images that tend to cause pixel jitter.

As with most data projectors, the PJD6683ws didn't do as well with video as with data images. Overall, the video quality was a bit below par for a data projector, which makes it the wrong choice if you need to show anything more than short video clips, assuming you need video at all.

Adding to the problems with video is the issue of rainbow artifacts, with light areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows. This is always a potential problem for DLP projectors, but with the PJD6683ws, I saw the artifacts more often than with most other recent models. The good news is that the rainbows show less often with data images than with video, which is typical, and few people, if any, should find them bothersome with data images. However, anyone who sees these artifacts easily will likely find them annoying for video.

Other Issues

Very much on the plus side, the PJD6683ws's audio quality is better than average for projectors in this weight class. The 10-watt mono speaker offers enough volume for a small to mid-size conference room, and the quality is good enough so all the dialog in our video clips was understandable.

Also worth mention is the projector's 3D support with DLP-Link glasses. This could become a useful feature, particularly for educational use, as more 3D material becomes available. But as with all DLP-link 3D projectors, there's a serious question about how practical 3D can be for audiences of more than a handful of people, given that glasses still sell for $70 or more each.

In a direct comparison, the ViewSonic PJD6683ws and the Optoma TW610ST come out very close overall, with the Optoma projector ahead in data image quality, but also costing more. Both offer video quality that's good enough for the short video clips you're likely to use a data projector for, and both offer 3D to help guard against obsolescence. If you need a bright, short-throw WXGA data projector, either one is a great choice, with the TW610ST the Editors' Choice for image quality, and the ViewSonic PJD6683ws the Editors' Choice for value.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

The ViewSonic PJD6683ws offers a 3000 lumen rating, 1280 by 800 native resolution, and a short throw lens. - ViewSonic PJD6683ws

ViewSonic PJD6683ws

4.0 Excellent

The ViewSonic PJD6683ws delivers a bright, high quality data image, a native 1280 by 800 resolution, and a short throw that lets you show big images from close to the screen.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio