PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ SH940

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ SH940 - BenQ SH940
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The BenQ SH940 projector offers a bright, high-quality—and high-resolution—data image, along with conveniences that include a 1.5x zoom lens and both vertical and horizontal lens shift.
Best Deal£1083.06

Buy It Now

£1083.06

Pros & Cons

    • 4,000-lumen rating.
    • 1,920 by 1,080 resolution.
    • Horizontal and vertical lens shift.
    • 1.5x zoom lens.
    • Good sound quality and volume.
    • Rainbow artifacts and annoyingly obvious digital noise limit usefulness for video.

BenQ SH940 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 4000
Warranty 36
Weight 15.9

Most people don't need a data projector with 1,920-by-1,080 resolution. But for those who do, the BenQ SH940 ($2,991.78 at Amazon), stands ready to fill the need. With more than twice as many pixels across and almost twice as many down as SVGA's 800 by 600, the SH940 can show a large spreadsheet with fully readable text in all the cells, an engineering drawing with clear detail, or four windows at once with each one showing roughly the same amount of data as a single SVGA screen. If that's the kind of resolution you need, the SH940 will be of more than a little interest.

With 1,920-by-1,080 pixels, the DLP-based SH940 is a step up in resolution from the Editors' Choice Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II( at Amazon). It's also a step up in rated brightness, at 4,000 lumens rather than 3,000. However, it doesn't offer the Canon SX80 Mark II's LCOS technology, which delivers better image quality than either DLP or LCD chips, and it doesn't offer the kind of color management that makes the SX80 Mark II such a good choice for showing photos at top quality. That said, the SH940 delivers on the most important issue for a data projector, with high-quality data images.

Basics

The SH940 weighs in at 15 pounds 14 ounces, making it most appropriate for permanent installation or for being mounted on a cart for room-to-room portability. Either way, as the 4,000-lumen rating makes clear, it's designed for a medium- to large-size conference room or classroom.

Using SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers) recommendations, 4,000 lumens would be appropriate in theater dark lighting and with a 1.0 gain screen for roughly a 270-inch diagonal image at the projector's native resolution. Even with moderate ambient light, it would still be suitable for a 170-inch diagonal screen, which is easily big enough for a large conference room.

One nice touch for setup is a little extra convenience in finding the right spot for the projector. The 1.5x zoom lens gives you flexibility in how far you can put it from the screen for any given size image, while the vertical and horizontal lens shift adds flexibility for the position up, down, left, and right. I measured the vertical shift as roughly 60 percent of the screen height up or down from the midpoint, and the horizontal shift as roughly 20 percent left or right from the midpoint. Position the projector anywhere in this range, and you can move the image to center it on the screen.

Beyond that, setup is standard, with the usual HDMI, composite video, and VGA for a computer or three-input component video, plus the less common option of using five-input component video with BNC connectors.

Data and Video Image Quality

Data image quality for the SH940 is excellent, with the projector sailing through our standard suite of DisplayMate tests. Colors were fully saturated and vibrant in all preset modes and color balance was in the top tier for projectors, with suitably neutral grays at all levels from black to white in all modes.

More important for data images, the projector also did an excellent job with detail. Both black on white and white on black text, for example, were crisp and highly readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points. Even better, analog connections were as rock solid as you would expect from a digital connection. I didn't see any pixel jitter or moiré patterns, even on screens that are designed to bring those problems out.

The SH940's video quality, unfortunately, isn't in the same league as its data image quality. The key issue is noise. With DVDs, noise showed up in almost every solid area in the image, like walls or the sky, and was annoyingly obvious in enough scenes to make it impossible to ignore. With Blu-ray discs, the noise was far less obvious, but there was more than with most projectors.

In addition to noise, the SH940's video suffers from rainbow artifacts. These artifacts, with light areas breaking up into flashes of red, green, and blue, are a potential concern for any single-chip DLP projector. With the SH940 I saw barely a hint of them with data images, and only with test images designed to make them show. As with most DLP projectors, however, the artifacts show up more often in video.

The good news for the SH940 is that with video I saw the rainbows notably less often than with most DLP projectors. Even those who see the artifacts easily probably wouldn't find them bothersome enough to be an issue for a few minutes of video in a presentation. However, they show often enough that they could easily be an annoying problem for the same people for long sessions.

One other plus for the SH940 is its audio system. The 10-watt mono speaker delivers enough volume for a large conference room or classroom, and the quality is among the best I've run into in a built-in audio system in a projector. If you need stereo or still better volume or sound quality, you can connect an external sound system to the projector's stereo output.

If you need a projector in the 4,000-lumen class, but don't need the SH940's high resolution, there are less expensive choices available, including the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector.

Similarly, if you need a projector that can show video reasonably well in addition to showing data images well, or you need one designed to let you tune the color just so, the Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II will be the better fit. But if you need a projector specifically for showing detailed data images at large enough size for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom, and you don't need to show much video, the BenQ SH940 could be exactly the projector you want.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

BenQ SH940 - BenQ SH940

BenQ SH940 Review

3.5 Good

The BenQ SH940 projector offers a bright, high-quality—and high-resolution—data image, along with conveniences that include a 1.5x zoom lens and both vertical and horizontal lens shift.

Get It Now
Best Deal£1083.06

Buy It Now

£1083.06

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio