PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Casio XJ-UT310WN

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Casio XJ-UT310WN - Casio XJ-UT310WN
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The XJ-UT310WN projector combines an ultra-short throw and Casio's hybrid LED-laser light source, with its low running cost and ecological benefits.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Ultra-short throw.
    • High-quality data image.
    • Low running cost, with a light source designed to last the life of the projector.
    • High initial cost.
    • 3D only works over VGA connection.

Casio XJ-UT310WN Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness 3100
Warranty 36
Weight 12.1

Casio's first ultra-short-throw projector, the XJ-UT310WN ($1,999.99), combines the company's hybrid LED-laser light source with an otherwise standard ultra-short-throw design. That makes the solid-state light source the obvious point of interest, with its ecological benefits that also translate into a low running cost. If you care more about total cost of ownership than initial price, the XJ-UT310WN ($1,295.00 at Amazon)  can be an attractive choice.

Built around a WXGA (1,280-by-800) DLP chip, the XJ-UT310WN offers a 3,100-lumen rating, making it bright enough for a small to midsize conference room or classroom. It's also in roughly the same brightness class as the 3,300-lumen Epson PowerLite 585W WXGA 3LCD Projector ($944.00 at Amazon) , which is Editors' Choice as a WXGA ultra-short-throw projector.

Among the advantages for the Epson projector is that, like most LCD-based models, its color brightness matches its white brightness. In contrast, as with most DLP-based projectors, the XJ-UT310WN's color brightness is lower than its white brightness. That means full-color images won't be as bright as you would expect based on white brightness. Another key difference is that the XJ-UT310WN costs more than the Epson projector, but has a lower running cost that could save money in the long run.

The solid-state light source is meant to last the life of the projector. That eliminates the need to buy replacement lamps, which typically cost between $100 and $300 each. Casio rates the XJ-UT310WN's light source at 20,000 hours. It also backs it up with a warranty that varies a bit depending on the type of customer you are (business, government, or education), but is a minimum of three years or 6,000 hours.

One strictly ecological plus is that the long life helps lower the projector's carbon footprint, since there's no additional shipping needed for replacement lamps. Also, unlike traditional lamps, the light source is mercury-free.

Basics, Setup, and Connections

At 12 pounds, 2 ounces, and 6 by 16.5 by 13.1 inches (HWD), the XJ-UT310WN is small enough to move by cart, or even by hand, from room to room, but most likely to wind up mounted permanently just above the screen, in a wall mount.

Setup is standard, with a manual focus and no zoom. For my tests, I used a 92-inch (diagonal) image, with the front of the projector 14 inches from the screen, and the window that serves as a lens near the back of the projector roughly 23 inches from the screen.

Image inputs on the side panel include the usual HDMI, VGA, and composite video ports as well an S-Video port, a USB Type B port for direct USB display, and a LAN port for sending both images and audio over a network. There's also a USB Type A port for reading files directly from a USB key or for the supplied Wi-Fi dongle.

Brightness and Eco Modes

In my tests, the XJ-UT310WN was easily bright enough for the image to stand up to the ambient light in a typical office or classroom. In many, if not most, cases, you'll even be able to take advantage of its Eco modes to save on electricity by minimizing power use.

Instead of a choice between a Bright mode and single Eco mode, the XJ-UT310WN offers two non-Eco modes and five Eco modes, so you can pick the one that's just right for your screen size and the level of ambient light. I measured power use for the various modes at a range of about 205 watts for the brightest, and a money-saving 85 watts for the least bright.

As with other Casio models, including the Casio XJ-H2650 , having multiple Eco modes gives you the luxury to pick the best color setting first, and then choose the least bright mode with the brightness you need, instead of having to use the color presets to adjust brightness.

Image Quality, 3D, and Audio

Quality for data images is one of the XJ-UT310WN's strong points. Colors in my tests were generally eye-catching and nicely saturated, although some colors changed noticeably with different presets.The projector did a near-excellent job holding detail, with white text on black crisp and readable at 6.8 points and black text on white highly readable at 9 points.

Related Story See How We Test Projectors

Video quality is barely acceptable for short clips. The most important issue I saw was rainbow artifacts (flashes of red, green, and blue), which are a potential problem for any DLP projector. With data screens, I saw almost none of these artifacts. With video, however, they show often enough that anyone who sees them easily will likely find them annoying for any clips that last more than a few minutes.

The XJ-UT310WN offers 3D capability. In this case, it's highly limited, with 3D working only over a VGA connection and only with DLP-Link glasses (not included).

One last feature that demands mention is the built-in audio system. The 16-watt mono speaker delivers better sound quality than most projectors offer and enough volume to fill a midsize to large room.

If you need an ultra-short-throw projector and are more concerned with initial cost than total cost of ownership, or you need video without rainbow artifacts, the Editors' Choice Epson 585W—with better-than-typical video for a data projector—is probably the model you want. If you don't need to show more than a few minutes of video at a time, however, and particularly if you care more about running cost than initial cost, the Casio XJ-UT310WN offers a combination of high quality for data images and an assortment of money-saving and ecologically friendly features that could mean a lower total cost of ownership.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Casio XJ-UT310WN - Casio XJ-UT310WN

Casio XJ-UT310WN Review

4.0 Excellent

The XJ-UT310WN projector combines an ultra-short throw and Casio's hybrid LED-laser light source, with its low running cost and ecological benefits.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio