PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ MH680 Review

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The BenQ MH680 projector offers 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) resolution with near-excellent quality for data images. It's a solid choice if you need to show fine detail in your data presentations. - BenQ MH680
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The BenQ MH680 projector offers 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) resolution with near-excellent quality for data images. It's a solid choice if you need to show fine detail in your data presentations.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • High 1,920-by-1,080 resolution.
    • Bright 3,000-lumen rating.
    • Excellent quality for data images.
    • Works with Blu-ray for 3D functionality.
    • Some rainbow artifacts in video.

BenQ MH680 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 3000
Warranty 12
Weight 6.1

A native 1,920-by-1,080 (1080p) resolution most often shows up in home-entertainment projectors, not data projectors like the BenQ MH680 ($799). However, if you need to show fine detail or lots of data, whether in the form of complex engineering drawings, large spreadsheets, or multiple windows simultaneously, and you want the information to be readable, a 1080p projector may be just what you need. The MH680($398.99 at Amazon) delivers a high-quality, bright image, and could easily be the right fit.

At 6 pounds 1 ounce, the MH680 is even light enough to carry with you. In fact, it weighs less than the NEC NP-M311W($578.36 at Amazon), our Editors' Choice for WXGA (1,024-by-768) projectors in this brightness and weight class. The MH680 is also less expensive, primarily because it the lacks some of the features the NEC model has, like a 1.7x zoom lens. (The lens on the MH680 is 1.3x.)

Brightness

Another key difference between the two projectors is that the NEC NP-M311W is built around three LCD chips, while the MH680 is built around a single DLP chip. Single-chip DLP projectors typically have significantly lower color brightness than white brightness, which can affect both color quality and the brightness of color images. So even though the 3,000-lumen white brightness rating for the MH680 is nearly the same as the NEC projector's 3,100-lumen rating, that doesn't mean the brightness for all images will be a close match. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why It Matters.)

According to the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, 3,000 lumens is bright enough, assuming a 1.0-gain screen, for roughly a 215- to 290-inch image in theater-dark lighting at the MH680's native 16:9 aspect ratio. In moderate ambient light, the size would drop to about 150 inches. For brighter ambient light or smaller screen sizes, you can lower the brightness level by switching to Eco mode, one of the less bright predefined modes, or both. For my tests, I had no problem finding a comfortable brightness level for viewing a 90-inch (diagonal) image in theater-dark lighting.

Setup

Setting up the MH680 is standard, with the manual 1.3x zoom offering reasonable flexibility in how far you can put the projector from the screen to get a given size image. Focusing is just a touch harder than it could be, however, since the focus changes considerably with very little movement.

Connectors include an HDMI port, a VGA port, an S-Video port, and a composite video port. There's also a USB Type A port for reading files directly from a USB memory key and a USB Type B port. One nice touch is that the HDMI port supports HDMI 1.4a, which means that you can connect directly to a Blu-ray player or other video source for 3D as well as 2D functionality.

Image Quality and Audio

Image quality for data images is just short of excellent. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, the projector scored well on color balance, with suitably neutral grays at all levels from black to white in all but the brightest preset mode. Color quality, similarly, had a few minor issues in the brightest mode. In particular, blue and red were noticeably dark. The projector scored well for color quality otherwise, with fully saturated, eye-catching colors in most predefined modes.

The MH680 did a good job with fine detail in our tests. White text on black, for example, was crisp and readable at sizes as small as 7.2 points, and black text on white was highly readable even at 5.4 points. In addition, images that tend to bring out pixel jitter and dynamic moiré were as rock solid with an analog (VGA) connection as with a digital (HDMI) connection.

Video quality is suitable for short clips at most, primarily because of rainbow artifacts—the red-green-blue flashes that are always a potential issue for DLP projectors. They are more often an issue with video than with data, as is the case here. I saw few enough of these artifacts with data images that it's unlikely that anyone would be bothered by them. A key problem for the MH680 is that the rainbow artifacts show often enough with video—more so than with most DLP projectors—that anyone in your audience who sees them easily will likely find them annoying.

For those who don't see these artifacts easily, the video is watchable, but not impressive, with dull color that goes along with a low contrast ratio, and more obvious noise in the image than with most projectors.

On the plus side, the 10-watt mono speaker offers good enough quality to be useful and enough volume for a small to mid-size room. If you need better quality, more volume, or stereo, you can connect an external sound system to the audio-out port.

If you don't show images with the kind of detail that needs full HD resolution, you'll be better off with a WXGA model, like BenQ's own MW523( at Amazon) or the Editors' Choice NEC NP-M311W, which doesn't offer 3D, but has both a more capable zoom lens, is rainbow-free, and has matching levels of white brightness and color brightness. If you need the high resolution, however, and particularly if you need portability, the BenQ MH680 delivers near-excellent quality for data images, is bright enough for a small to midsize room, and is light enough to carry with you.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The BenQ MH680 projector offers 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) resolution with near-excellent quality for data images. It's a solid choice if you need to show fine detail in your data presentations. - BenQ MH680

BenQ MH680 Review

3.5 Good

The BenQ MH680 projector offers 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) resolution with near-excellent quality for data images. It's a solid choice if you need to show fine detail in your data presentations.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio