PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Canon REAliS SX80 Mark II

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II business projector delivers bright, high resolution images with the ability to fine tune the color. - Canon REAliS SX80 Mark II
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II offers unusually fine control over color settings, making it of particular interest for applications where it's important to get colors right.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Fine control over color.
    • LCOS technology.
    • Can show images from PictBridge cameras and USB memory keys.
    • Relatively big and heavy.
    • Volume is too low to be usable.

Canon REAliS SX80 Mark II Specs

Engine Type LCoS
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces Digital (DVI-D)
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1400 x 1050
Rated Brightness 3000
Warranty 36
Weight 11.5

No matter how you look at it, the Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II ($3,999 direct) business projector is anything but typical. Like the Editors' Choice Canon REALiS X700 ($2,500 street, 4 stars), it's built around Canon's version of LCOS technology, which eliminates common issues with LCD and DLP projectors. Its SXGA+ (1,400 by 1,050) resolution gives it an advantage over most data projectors for images with fine detail. And it offers unusually advanced control over color, making it of particular interest to anyone who needs to get onscreen color just so. The total package is unusual in the extreme, and I mean that in a good way.

According to Canon the SX80 Mark II does particularly well in the higher education market, which is probably due to a combination of features, including the excellent image quality and the bright image rated at 3000 lumens, as well as the color control.

Being able to get the color right would be a compelling feature for say, an art history class, and the high resolution would be of obvious interest for any number of other subjects, particularly in science and engineering, that need to show images with fine detail. The same features make the projector of special interest to photographers, galleries, and anyone else who needs to get the most out of photos.

The Basics
The SX80 Mark II is a little big and heavy to count as truly portable, at 11.5 pounds and 4.8 by 13 by 13.4 inches. However, it's in the luggable range, and Canon provides a soft carrying case. Basic setup is mostly standard fare, but with a few important conveniences added. Hit the Auto Set button on the remote, for example, and the projector will automatically focus as well as sync to the incoming signal. In addition, both the focus and 1.5 to 1 zoom are motorized, so you can adjust them easily from the remote.

Canon put the connectors for the SX80 Mark II on a side panel rather than the back, but the more important issue is that there's a reasonably full set, including an HDMI 1.3 port for a digital computer or video source, a DVI-I port for a digital computer, a VGA input for a computer or component video, a pass-through monitor port, and both an S-Video and a composite video port. There are also three miniplugs for stereo audio inputs, and one for stereo output. In addition, a USB type A port lets you show jpg images from a USB memory key or PictBridge camera.

Brightness and Image Quality
As already mentioned, Canon rates the SX80 Mark II at 3000 lumens, which is an increasingly common level of brightness for projectors in its weight class and lighter. The Casio Green Slim XJ-A250 ($1399.99 direct, 4 stars) that I recently reviewed, for example, is also rated at 3,000 lumens. In my tests, that translated into an image that was more than bright enough, at 52 inches across (64-inches diagonal), to stand up to bright sunlight streaming through a nearby window.

As expected, based on my experience with earlier models of Canon LCOS projectors, the SX80 Mark II sailed through our suite of DisplayMate tests without a problem. Colors were bright, vibrant, and fully saturated, color balance was excellent with truly neutral gray at all shades from black to white, and both white on black and black on white text was sharp and highly readable down to the smallest sizes we test with.

Video images weren't at quite the same level, but that's expected for a data projector. I saw a slight loss of detail in dark areas on screen, and the slightest hint of posterization (color changing suddenly where it should change gradually), but only in scenes we use because they tend to bring out these problems.

With less demanding scenes, which are more typical of most commercial video and movies, the projector did a good enough job to make it suitable for watching a full-length movie, although it's not in the same league as even a mid-range home entertainment projector like the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 ($1,299 direct, 4 stars).

Color Management
Because of the projector's photo mode, I put more emphasis than usual on testing it with photos. Quite simply, the results were superb, thanks largely to the advanced color adjustments.

The photo mode and advanced color controls offer far more precise control over color than the vast majority of projectors. Among other features, they let you, for example, adjust both the saturation and hue for each primary and secondary color—red, green, blue, cyan, yellow, and magenta. They're also supplemented by features like a color temperature setting and four options for dynamic gamma adjustment, which can analyze each image and adjust the gamma setting to affect contrast differently at different levels of brightness.

Improving the color for photos turned out to be much easier with these controls than with most color management systems. Even unsophisticated users should be able to master them without too much of a learning curve. Professionals who are used to color adjustments shouldn't have any learning curve at all.

Other Issues
More often than not, projectors in the SX80 Mark II's weight class offer meager audio systems, but Canon's taken that tradition to new heights of pointlessness, with a 1-watt mono speaker. The audio quality is reasonably good if you're close enough to hear it, but for most purposes, you will definitely want to plug an external sound system into the audio output.

Aside from the severely underpowered sound system, the SX80 Mark II is an impressive beast, with excellent data image quality, better video image quality than most data projectors, and particularly good photo quality. Given the cost, most people will probably consider it overkill for business use, but for those who need the best color quality they can find, it's easily worth the price. Add in the advanced color management and it's a runaway pick for Editors' Choice.

COMPARISON TABLE
Compare the Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II with several other projectors side by side.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

The Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II business projector delivers bright, high resolution images with the ability to fine tune the color. - Canon REAliS SX80 Mark II

Canon REAliS SX80 Mark II

4.0 Excellent

The Canon REALiS SX80 Mark II offers unusually fine control over color settings, making it of particular interest for applications where it's important to get colors right.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio