PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Ricoh PJ WX4130N

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Ricoh PJ WX4130N - Ricoh PJ WX4130N
4.5 Outstanding

The Bottom Line

Impressively light for an ultra-short throw projector, the Ricoh PJ WX4130N delivers big, high-quality data images at just inches away from the screen.

Pros & Cons

    • Ultra-short throw.
    • Remarkably small and light.
    • High-quality data image.
    • Good video quality for a data projector.
    • Shows rainbow artifacts (although less often than with many DLP projectors).

Ricoh PJ WX4130N Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 5.6 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 8.7 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness: 2500 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 2000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: No
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480i
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Type: Business
USB Ports: 1
Video Inputs: Composite
Video Inputs: HDMI
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Warranty Labor: 36 months
Warranty Parts: 36 months
Weight: 6.6 lb
Width: 10.1 inches
Wireless Connectivity: Yes
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Digital

File the Ricoh PJ WX4130N under surprisingly different. Almost every other ultra-short throw projector has the same basic design, shaped like a standard projector, but with the lens near the back, pointing at a mirror that sticks up from the case to reflect the image to the screen. The WX4130N is shaped like a tall, thin toaster, with the lens and mirror inside the case, and a window on top where light comes out instead of toast. The design puts the window close to the front of the projector, but it doesn't put the projector any further from the screen. It also makes the WX4130N remarkably small and light, as well as Editors' Choice.

When I reviewed the Editors' Choice Hitachi CP-A221N ($1,300 street, 4.5 stars), earlier this year, I pointed out that it was unusually light for an ultra-short throw projector. The WX4130N is a full two pounds lighter, at 6 pounds 10 ounces, and it measures just 8.7 by 10.1 by 5.6 inches (HWD).

Most ultra-short throw models from other companies, including, for example, the Canon LV-8235 UST, are meant primarily for permanent installation, or, at most, room to room to room portability on a cart. The WX4130N can serve easily enough in both rolls, but given the weight and size, it is better suited than even the CP-A221N for easily carrying from room to room by hand or even using as a portable projector.

loading...

Basics, Setup, and Throw Distance

Aside from the ultra-short throw, the WX4130N offers a fairly typical constellation of features for a lightweight data projector. Built around a WXGA (1280 by 800) DLP chip, it's rated at 2,500 lumens, which is on the low side by today's standards, but still within the typical range for portable data projectors. Like many recent DLP projectors, it offers limited support for 3D, but you have to buy DLP-link glasses separately.

In addition to the usual connection choices—VGA, composite video, and HDMI—options for image input include a LAN port and built-in Wi-Fi for connecting to either a network or directly to a PC. Ricoh also offers a free iPad app (sorry, no iPhones) for connecting by Wi-Fi to show PDF-format files. It also offers a USB A port that lets you plug in a USB memory key to read JPG and MPEG2 files directly.

Setup is standard. Interestingly, in my tests the projector offered more flexibility for image size than Ricoh claims. The official range at the native 16:10 aspect ratio is 48 to 80 inches diagonally (40 to 68 inches wide) with a distance of 4.6 to 9.6 inches from the screen. I had no trouble getting a well focused, suitably bright image at somewhat larger sizes, but the top of the image tends to bow if you go much larger than 80 inches diagonally. For all of our standard testing, I stayed with Ricoh's recommendations and used an 80-inch diagonal image.

Image Quality

The WX4130N scored well for data image quality. It did well on maintaining uniform brightness across the entire screen, which can be a problem with ultra-short throw projectors, and it did swimmingly on our suite of DisplayMate tests.

Yellow looked just a touch mustard-colored, which is common in DLP projectors, but colors were well saturated and vibrant otherwise. Color balance was good, with suitably neutral grays at every step from black to white. Text readability was also good, with crisp, highly readable characters at sizes as small as 6.8 points for white on black text and 8 points for black on white. Also very much worth mention is that images designed to show pixel jitter were as rock solid with an analog connection as with a digital connection.

The WX4130N's video quality is better than many data projectors can manage. In my tests with 1080p input from a Blu-ray player, the WX4130N handled skin tones reasonably well, and I didn't see any motion artifacts or enough noise to find it bothersome. I also didn't see any posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually) or serious loss of shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) even on clips chosen because they tend to bring out those problems. Probably the best characterization of the video quality is that it's watchable, but not in the same class as a home theater projector.

Rainbows and Other Issues

Rainbow artifacts, with light areas on screen breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows, are always a potential issue for any single-chip DLP projector. The WX4130N does reasonably well on this score. If you see the rainbow effect easily, as I do, you'll see it on some data screens, but probably not often enough to find annoying. It shows more often with video, but still infrequently enough that even those who are sensitive to seeing the rainbows will probably consider them tolerable.

Also worth mention is that the sound system, with its 2-watt mono speaker, is surprisingly capable, with reasonably good quality and enough volume for a small conference room. The fan is a little loud, rated at 38dB in standard mode and 32dB in low power mode, but with the projector so close to the screen, no one should be sitting close enough to it for that to be an issue.

Even ignoring the ultra-short throw, the Ricoh PJ WX4130N offers a lot to like, with a high-quality data image, reasonably high-quality video image, and surprisingly useful audio. What makes it worth the price, of course, is the ultra-short throw. What makes it Editors' Choice for WXGA ultra-short throw projector is the innovative design that makes it smaller and lighter than the competition without giving a (metaphorical or literal) inch in its throw distance from the screen.

More Projector Reviews:

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Ricoh PJ WX4130N - Ricoh PJ WX4130N

Ricoh PJ WX4130N

4.5 Outstanding

Impressively light for an ultra-short throw projector, the Ricoh PJ WX4130N delivers big, high-quality data images at just inches away from the screen.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio