PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Kodak Luma 500

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Kodak Luma 500 - Kodak Luma 500 (Credit: M. David Stone)
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Kodak Luma 500 packs all the features we expect in a mini projector—from auto focus to Google TV for streaming—into an even smaller, lighter device, making it the palmtop projector to beat.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • 1080p (1,920 by 1,080) native resolution
    • Supports 4K input
    • Google TV for streaming
    • Auto focus and auto four-corner keystone correction
    • Built-in battery
    • Lacks a traditional brightness control for adjusting black level
    • Image quality for HDR is lower than for SDR
    • Mirroring from phones or tablets is limited to Chromecast, which doesn't support a direct connection

Kodak Luma 500 Specs

Dimensions (HWD) 1.3 by 5.2 by 5.2
Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Bluetooth
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI 2.1
Inputs and Interfaces USB 2.0
Inputs and Interfaces Wi-Fi
Maximum Resolution 3840 by 2160
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080 using 960-by-540 DLP chip with XPR fast-switch pixel shifting
Rated Brightness 150
Warranty 1
Weight 1.2

The Kodak Luma 500 is the latest flagship in a line of Kodak projectors that all share a flat, rectangular palmtop shape, though they differ in size, features, and price. The Luma 500 is the biggest in the group (by two-tenths of an inch in two dimensions) and the most expensive, at a list price of $699.99, though it's widely available for less. More important, it's the most impressive palmtop model we’ve yet seen, with solid image quality, particularly for SDR input, and features that include HDR support, 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) native resolution, built-in Google TV for streaming, and even a full-size Google TV remote complete with voice control. That makes it an easy pick as our newest Editors' Choice winner for a palmtop projector.

Design: Think 1080p Mini Projector in a Palmtop Size

If you're in the market for a palmtop projector, small size and easy portability are among your top concerns. The good news on that score is that, even though the Luma 500 is on the large side for a palmtop, it's still small enough to fit easily in a coat pocket, measuring 1.3 by 5.2 by 5.2 inches (HWD), and weighing just 1.2 pounds. It also offers a sleek design and a choice of case color schemes: white with gold, or black with silver.

Like most pocket and palmtop models, it's built around RGB LEDs for the light source and a DLP chip. In this case, the projector offers native 960-by-540 resolution from the chip, paired with TI's XPR fast-shift pixel shifting to display 1,920 by 1,080 pixels on screen. Somewhat unusually, Kodak doesn't publish a rated life for the light source, but LEDs are generally rated at 20,000 hours or more.

One welcome touch is that the Luma 500 offers Google TV for its OS and for streaming, along with Chromecast. Most palmtop projectors—or at least those we've seen so far—either don't offer streaming at all or use a much less capable option that relies on apps that can be flaky or hard to use. Google TV has neither of those problems and offers a wealth of apps to choose from.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

You can run the Luma 500 on AC power or use its built-in battery. The rated life (and brightness) varies with the power mode: 2 hours in Eco mode and something lower (with no official rating) in the full-power Standard mode. The physical setup requires no more than connecting to AC power or ensuring the battery is charged, optionally connecting a video source, and then turning the power on. Google TV setup is standard, with Wi-Fi as the only option for connecting to your network. For connecting to local video sources, there's an HDMI port on the back, a USB Type-A port for reading files from USB memory, and the built-in Chromecast for iOS and Android devices connected to the same network.

Kodak includes a table-top tripod along with the projector, which is a mixed blessing. It makes it easy to aim at whatever you're using as a screen, but it also makes it more likely that you'll tilt or swivel the projector and need a keystone adjustment to square off the image. The catch is that the Luma 500 has a low brightness to begin with, at a rated 150 lumens, and keystone adjustment will lower the brightness even further for any given size image. In short, it's best to avoid using either auto or manual keystone features if you can. That said, if you choose to use it anyway, note that the auto keystone worked well in my tests. Auto focus worked well, too, and there's no reason to avoid using it.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

The onboard dual 1.5-watt speakers deliver usable sound quality, but at a volume suitable for a quiet, small-to-medium-size family room. For decent volume or better audio quality, plan to use the 3.5mm audio out port or Bluetooth to connect headphones or an external sound system.

Performance: Good Enough Image Quality for HDR, Better for SDR

Thanks to the Google TV OS, the Luma 500's menu options are more in line with mini projectors than with most palmtops, resulting in a richer, more useful set of image-quality settings than you'll find in its closest competition. For SDR input, you can choose from five predefined picture modes. Most lack any settings adjustments. However, Custom mode lets you change contrast, saturation, sharpness, color temperature, and gamma. Missing from that list is a traditional brightness adjustment for adjusting black level, which is unfortunately becoming common on many projectors.

On our standard PowerPoint test images, all five modes, including Custom with default settings, delivered suitably neutral color for graphics. They also handled photos reasonably well, although Vivid mode delivered slightly more realistic hues than the other choices.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

For our SDR viewing tests with movies, colors were slightly desaturated across all modes, which made Custom, with its Saturation control, my preferred choice. Boosting the setting brought colors into a more realistic-looking range. Color accuracy was still off by enough for someone with a critical eye to notice, but at a level that few, if any, will find bothersome. Contrast, black level, and sense of three dimensionality in dark scenes were similarly in the range of reasonably good, which is actually high praise for a palmtop. Even shadow detail held well. Some minor detail in the darkest areas of our test clips didn't show, but I had no trouble making out what was happening in those scenes.

Results for the same scenes played from 4K HDR10 versions of the same movies were similar in most ways. The entries on the picture mode menu switched to versions that added "HDR" to the names, including an HDR-Custom mode as the only one that allowed changes.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

Here again, colors were desaturated using the default settings, and I improved them by raising the Saturation setting. I also switched the Gamma setting from the default Normal to Bright to brighten up the image overall. However, even with the adjusted Gamma, the image was substantially dimmer than with SDR input, forcing me to move the projector closer to the screen to get a brighter, but smaller, picture. After my adjustments, HDR image quality was similar to SDR, except for a significantly greater loss of shadow detail, making it hard to make out what was happening in dark scenes.

The good news for HDR viewing is that most movies have few or no dark scenes where poor shadow detail is a problem, but it's still best to stick with SDR input if you can. Very much on the plus side, I didn't see many rainbow artifacts (red/green/blue flashes that DLP projectors tend to show) in any of the viewing tests. As always, keep in mind that some people see these flashes more easily than others. If you're concerned with the issue, be sure to buy from a dealer that allows easy returns.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

One plus for gamers is a short enough input lag for all but the most serious gaming. I measured it with my Bodnar 4K Lag Tester at 21.7ms for 1080p/60Hz input. As expected for projectors at this brightness level, there is no 3D support.

Image brightness in my tests was roughly what I expected from Kodak's 150 ANSI lumen rating—a respectable level for a palmtop. Using Society for Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations for a dark room, 150 lumens is enough to light up a 47-to-64-inch diagonal, 16:9, 1.0-gain screen. For my SDR tests, I settled on a 56-inch image. For the dimmer overall image with HDR, I dropped the size to a smaller, brighter 42 inches.

Final Thoughts

Kodak Luma 500 - Kodak Luma 500 (Credit: M. David Stone)

Kodak Luma 500

4.0 Excellent

The Kodak Luma 500 packs all the features we expect in a mini projector—from auto focus to Google TV for streaming—into an even smaller, lighter device, making it the palmtop projector to beat.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio