PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ HT2060

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ HT2060 - BenQ HT2060
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

BenQ's HT2060 is limited to 1080p and shows obvious rainbow artifacts, but it serves well enough in dark home theaters. (It can even moonlight as a gaming projector, thanks to its low input lag.)
Best Deal£1960

Buy It Now

£1960

Pros & Cons

    • Accepts 4K HDR input, downconverting it to 1080p
    • Supports HDR10 and HLG HDR
    • Supports 3D
    • Holds shadow detail well, particularly with SDR input
    • 1.3x zoom and modest vertical lens shift make installation easy
    • Short input lag times
    • Shows frequent rainbow artifacts
    • Overall image quality for HDR is a step down from SDR

BenQ HT2060 Specs

Dimensions (HWD) 4.6 by 14.4 by 9.6 inches
Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI 2.1
Maximum Resolution 3840 by 2160 60Hz, HDR; Full HD 3D
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 2300
Warranty 1
Weight 7.9

The BenQ HT2060 ($999) is the least expensive projector the Taiwanese tech giant offers for dark home theaters and the only one with a 1080p native resolution, rather than state-of-the-art 4K. Surprisingly, our testing shows it doesn't handle HDR as well as the cheaper BenQ TH685P, which is designed for home entertainment in rooms with ambient light (meaning that it focuses more on brightness than image quality). Under most circumstances, the TH685P or a more expensive 4K projector like the Editors' Choice-winning Epson Pro Cinema 4050 are better choices. However, the HT2060 offers high-enough image quality—particularly for SDR input—to make it a reasonable value, and its solid-state light source eliminates the need to buy replacement lamps, which can save money in the long run compared with the lamp-based TH685P.


Design: Simple Setup, Plus Surprisingly Capable Speakers

The HT2060 is built around a 1,920-by-1,080-pixel DLP chip paired with a four-channel LED—red, green, and two blues—an increasingly common choice for a light source, particularly for BenQ models. (The second blue channel is typically used to increase brightness.) BenQ rates the color gamut at 98% of Rec.709 (aka BT.709), the standard for TVs.

Setup is notably straightforward, with no built-in smart TV feature needing a network connection to add steps. At 7.9 pounds and 4.6 by 14.4 by 9.6 inches (HWD), the HT2060 is small and light enough to handle easily during setup, while the manual 1.3x zoom offers flexibility in how far you can place it from the screen for a given size image. The HT2060 also offers a small vertical lens shift—just plus or minus 5% of the centered position—which can help you adjust the image height without resorting to tilting the projector up or down and then using digital keystone to square off the picture. The only connections for image sources are two HDMI ports on the rear panel.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

Home theater projectors traditionally offer minimal or no onboard audio, since most people will add an external sound system in home theater setups. (Such audio systems, even modest ones, will put anything that could fit in the projector itself to shame.) In that context, the HT2060 does better most on this score, offering dual 5-watt speakers that deliver reasonably good sound quality along with enough volume to fill a large family room. Those who want the better quality that goes with an external system can use the 3.5mm analog stereo output or the S/PDIF optical audio output on the rear panel.


Testing the BenQ HT2060: Good Quality SDR, Watchable HDR

The menus offer three predefined picture modes for SDR input, plus a user mode. ISF Day and ISF Night modes are also available if you're willing to pay for a full calibration, but it's hard to recommend that, since the calibration could cost more than the projector. As with most competitors, the brightest predefined mode, Bright, has an obvious green bias, making it best avoided for regular use. However, even in Bright mode, the colors are within a range that most people would consider tolerable, for example, for occasional use on a bright afternoon. The other two predefined modes deliver much better color accuracy and contrast straight out of the box.

After some preliminary testing, I picked Living Room mode—which is also the default setting—for my viewing tests because it delivered better shadow detail than Filmmaker mode. The only change I made was to set brightness properly, by lowering it just a touch.

For HDR input, the HT2060 supports both HDR10 and HLG. In my tests comparing 1080p SDR with 4K HDR versions of the same movie on disc, the projector negotiated a 4K HDR10 connection with the Blu-ray player when using the 4K disc, and it offered two predefined modes: Filmmaker and HDR10. In this case, HDR10 offered the better image quality of the two, and I couldn't find any settings that improved on the defaults.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

For SDR input, the HT2060 delivered good color accuracy as well as good contrast in both dark and brightly lit scenes. Dark scenes also maintained the dramatic visual impact inherent in the scene, holding almost all of the detail I know to look for in the shadows, and offering a satisfyingly dark black level and good contrast. HDR input is eminently watchable but a step down from the SDR version of the same movie. The image in both dark and bright scenes was darker overall than in the SDR version and delivered much lower contrast, dulling down colors. So, although the HT2060 handles HDR better than some 1080p projectors that support HDR, it delivers a better-looking image for SDR.

For full HD 3D, the projector supports DLP-Link glasses, and it offers a single 3D picture mode. I didn't see any crosstalk in my tests, but 3D-related motion artifacts were a touch more obvious than for most current-generation models with 3D support.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

As with any single-chip DLP projector, rainbow artifacts (red/green/blue flashes) are a potential issue for those who see them easily, as I do. I found them more obvious on this BenQ model than with many projectors, but they showed themselves no more frequently than typical. If you're concerned about this issue, try to buy from a retailer that allows easy returns without a restocking fee so you can test it out for yourself.

The good news for gamers is that the projector's input-lag measures at 60Hz and 120Hz refresh rates match those of current state-of-the-art gaming projectors. My Bodnar meter measured 16.3 milliseconds (ms) at 60Hz for both 1080p and 4K input, and 8.3ms for 1080p/120Hz.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

Despite being designed for viewing in a dark room, where high brightness isn't needed, the HT2060 is bright enough to give you a reasonably large image even in a family room with lights on. According to the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, the rated 2,300 lumens is suitably bright for roughly a 220-inch 1.0-gain screen in a dark room. In my tests, it easily filled a 90-inch 1.0-gain screen using either the lower brightness Cinema mode setting for SDR, or the HDR10 mode for HDR. It even managed reasonably well at that size when I turned on a floor lamp.


Verdict: A 1080p Projector in a 4K World

How you feel about the BenQ HT2060 will depend heavily on whether most of the movies and videos you watch are in 1080p SDR format (which the projector handles nicely) or in 4K HDR (which our testing shows to be a step down in image quality).

If you'll be watching 4K HDR material often enough for that to be a problem, and you can't stretch your budget enough to consider a 4K projector like the Editors' Choice-winning Epson Pro Cinema 4050—one of our top picks for 4K home theater projectors—be sure to take a look at the BenQ TH685P and the Epson Home Cinema 2350 instead. These 1080p alternatives are designed for rooms with ambient light, which means a focus on brightness rather than color accuracy or contrast, which gives the HT2060 the advantage for 1080p SDR viewing in a dark room. For HDR, however, each does a better job than the HT2060, according to our tests. This makes them potentially better choices if most of what you watch is HDR. The Home Cinema 2350 is also the only one of the 1080p projectors mentioned here that doesn't show rainbow artifacts, a feature it shares with the Pro Cinema 4050.

That said, if you expect that most of your viewing will be for 1080p SDR in a dark room, and especially if rainbow artifacts aren't an issue, the BenQ HT2060 is the obvious choice in this group.

Final Thoughts

BenQ HT2060 - BenQ HT2060

BenQ HT2060

3.5 Good

BenQ's HT2060 is limited to 1080p and shows obvious rainbow artifacts, but it serves well enough in dark home theaters. (It can even moonlight as a gaming projector, thanks to its low input lag.)

Get It Now
Best Deal£1960

Buy It Now

£1960

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio