PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector With Miracast

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector With Miracast - Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector with Miracast
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Epson Pro EX10000 delivers a bright enough image to stand up to ambient light in a large conference room or classroom, but the quality of that image may not justify the steep price tag.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Rated at 4,500 lumens, bright enough for a well-lit large room
    • Laser-phosphor light source requires virtually no maintenance, no replacement
    • Three-chip LCD (3LCD) design eliminates rainbow artifacts
    • Matching color and white brightness
    • Wi-Fi for Miracast screen mirroring and network connections
    • Allows two-way and four-way splits
    • Middling contrast, despite the high rating for contrast ratio
    • No support for HDR or 3D
    • Not true 1080p; may add artifacts to images with repeating patterns

Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector with Miracast Specs

Dimensions (HWD) 4.1 by 12.8 by 11.8
Engine Type LCD
Inputs and Interfaces Composite
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces RGB Passthrough
Inputs and Interfaces VGA/Component
Maximum Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 4500
Warranty 1
Weight 9.1

The Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector with Miracast ($1,299.99) is Epson's flagship business-oriented portable projector. At a rated 4,500 lumens, it can throw a sufficiently big and bright image for viewing in a large room. Epson bills it as designed for social distancing, but once we go back to crowding lots of people into conference rooms and classrooms, the projector will still work just as well. Unfortunately, it will also have all the same flaws, including artifacts in some 1080p images, poor contrast, and a heavy weight for a supposed portable. For $450 less, the smaller lamp-based Epson Pro EX9240 is a better buy, with many of the same features and even a few advantages.


Portability Is in the Arm Strength of the Holder

At 4.1 by 12.8 by 11.8 inches (HWD) and 9.1 pounds, the EX10000 is a size and weight most often used in permanent setups. It's nowhere near as portable as true lightweights such as the AAXA P6X Pico Projector ($350), but its 4,500-lumen rating means it's substantially brighter. It's also brighter than most larger semi-portable projectors, including the InFocus Genesis IN118BB ($699) and the Epson Pro EX9240. You might not love lugging it through an airport, but it comes with a soft carrying case if you need to, and it can be easily moved from room to room within a school or office building.

The EX10000 is built around a laser-phosphor light source and three LCD chips. The light source is meant to last the life of the projector. Be sure to factor that into any price comparison you make with lamp-based projectors with lower initial prices but additional costs and hassle for replacing lamps. Epson rates the light source at 20,000 hours in both Normal (full power) and Quiet (eco) modes.

Showing front, top, and left side

The three LCD chips guarantee an image free of rainbow artifacts. However, despite the Full HD resolution rating for the projector, they are not 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) chips. Instead, Epson uses 1,366-by-768 chips combined with pixel shifting. This approach is standard for keeping costs down in 4K projectors, but it's rare for 1080p projectors.

Pixel shifting splits frames into smaller subsets of pixels, then shifts the pixel position for each subset to put more pixels on screen for each frame than are in the chip itself. Compared with images using chips that don't need pixel shifting for the same resolution, this tends to produce slightly less detail and sharpness, because the individual pixels are actually a bit larger. The difference doesn't matter much for 4K, because few people can see it at a typical seating distance from the screen. In this case, however, I noticed a slightly soft focus. (I'll touch on this again when discussing image quality.)


Straightforward Setup and Lots of Connection Options

Setting up the EX10000 consists of little more than finding the right spot for the projector, plugging in a power cord, and adjusting the manual focus and 1.6x zoom. As with most laser projectors, you can fine-tune the brightness to get just as much as you need for your screen size and ambient light level. The Custom setting lets you set the brightness level from 70% to 100% in 1% increments. You can also set the projector to maintain a consistent brightness over its lifetime, automatically increasing the power as the light source ages and dims.

Among the projector's strong points are the variety of connection options. In addition to two HDMI ports and a VGA port that doubles for component video, there's a USB Type-B port for plug-and-play display, an Ethernet port, and a USB Type-A port for reading files from a USB key. Wi-Fi lets you connect to a local network and use Miracast screen mirroring from a phone or tablet. There's even a composite video port with RCA phono plug connectors.

Rear view, showing ports

It's easy to set up a two-way or four-way split to see images from up to four sources at once. A simple setup screen lets you select which source to show in each area of the screen and which source's audio to use.


Great-Looking Business Graphics (Mostly)

Most people will consider any of the EX10000's five color modes acceptable for presentations, even for those that include photos or video, but some are better than others. My preferred mode is Cinema. In my tests, it had the most accurate color; the best contrast and shadow detail, which are key requirements for photorealistic images; and the best overall balance of color accuracy and image brightness. This combination translates to excellent image quality for most presentations.

The exception is for presentations that include images with fine, repeating details, such as narrow stripes. The EX10000 added scaling artifacts to some images with repeating detail in my tests. These artifacts are caused by the need to add or drop pixels to make an image fit in the number of pixels available in the display when there isn't an exact match between the two. You may never see these glitches, but they can be a potential issue if you use patterned fills or similar images. I also confirmed with Epson that the need to scale images is at least partly responsible for the slight soft-focus effect I mentioned earlier, which can make smaller text and other fine details look a little blurry.

Top view, showing control panel, focus and zoom rings, and other controls

The EX10000's image quality for film and video isn't a match for even a low-end home theater projector; this is not a projector you're going to take home on the weekends for movie-watching. Its poor contrast is particularly noticeable in dimly lit scenes. However, it still produces highly watchable video as long as the image isn't too dark, which makes it far more capable on this score than many business and education projectors.

See How We Test ProjectorsSee How We Test Projectors

Brightness is a key strength. According to the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, 4,500 lumens is bright enough for a 300-inch, 1.0 gain, 16:9 screen in a dark room. In moderate ambient light, it's enough for a 175-inch image. In my tests using a 90-inch screen, even the lower-brightness Cinema mode was too bright at full power for comfortable viewing in a dark room. With lights on, including one pointed directly at the screen to simulate an unshaded window in a conference room, the image was still bright enough to hold up nicely.


High Brightness, Vibrant Color, and Light Weight

The Epson Pro EX10000 is one of the brightest available projectors that can still claim to be portable. As already mentioned, there are plenty of much lighter models, including the AAXA P6X Pico Projector, which can fit in a briefcase or backpack, but they don't offer anything like the EX10000's 4,500 lumens. Even the InFocus IN118BB, which is a bit more than half the weight of EX10000, delivers noticeably lower brightness.

The EX10000's high brightness, vibrant color, and good color accuracy make it well suited to business and educational presentations in midsize to large rooms with ambient light. If you frequently need to show photos, video clips, or full-length movies as well as typical presentation text and graphics, its better-than-typical handling of photorealistic images for a business projector make it a reasonable choice. But if your presentations are more likely to be filled with small text, fine detail, or repeating patterns—or if the $1,300 price tag is hard to swallow—a better option is the Epson Pro EX9240, which uses native 1080p imaging chips for crisp images, has a more genuinely portable weight, and leaves $450 in your bank account.

Final Thoughts

Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector With Miracast - Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector with Miracast

Epson Pro EX10000 3LCD Full HD 1080p Wireless Laser Projector With Miracast

3.0 Average

The Epson Pro EX10000 delivers a bright enough image to stand up to ambient light in a large conference room or classroom, but the quality of that image may not justify the steep price tag.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio