PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

ViewSonic PJD6553w

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The ViewSonic PJD6553w data projector offers a 3,500 lumen rating and a sub-six-pound weight. - ViewSonic PJD6553w
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The ViewSonic PJD6553w delivers a bright, high quality data image, a reasonably watchable video image, and the convenience of a 1.3X zoom lens.

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 3,500 lumen rating.
    • Light enough to be portable.
    • 1.3X zoom lens.
    • HDMI port.
    • Although rainbow artifacts show less often than with many DLP projectors, they still show, particularly with video.

ViewSonic PJD6553w Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 9.5 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 3.3 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness: 3500 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 15000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
Video Inputs: Component
Video Inputs: Composite
Video Inputs: HDMI
Video Inputs: S-Video
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 36 months
Warranty Parts: 36 months
Weight: 5.7 lb
Width: 11.6 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Optical

The ViewSonic PJD6553w ($700 street) is best described as a well-executed version of a fairly typical design, with some extra brightness thrown in for good measure. Built around a WXGA (1,280 by 800) DLP chip, it's bright enough to throw a suitably large image for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom even with the lights on. Add in its reasonably high-quality data image and usable video, and it well worth a close look if you need WXGA native resolution and a bright image.

With a 3,500-lumen rating, the PJD6553w falls between the Editors' Choice Optoma TW610ST below, rated at 3,100 lumens, and the Optoma TW762 above, rated at 4,000 lumens. As with both Optoma models, it's in a size and weight class that most often winds up permanently installed or on a cart, but is also light enough to carry. In that context, it has a slight advantage for portable use as the lightest of the three, at 5.7 pounds. Unlike the TW762, however, it doesn't come with a carrying case, which means you'll have to buy one separately if you want to use it as a portable.

Connections, Setup, and Brightness

Setting up the PJD6553w is a touch easier than with most projectors, thanks to the 1.3x manual zoom giving a little more flexibility than most for how far you can put the projector from the screen for any given size image. For image input, the back panel offers the usual VGA and composite video options, plus S-Video and HDMI ports. There's also a pass-through monitor port.

The projector was suitably bright for the rating in my tests, which translates to being able to throw an image that's both bright enough and large enough for the size room it's meant for. More precisely, the 78-inch wide (92-diagonal) image I used was easily bright enough to stand up to a typical level of ambient light in a mid-size conference room or classroom.

Data and Video Image Quality

Data image quality was good to excellent, with the projector scoring well overall on our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, despite some minor problems with color issues. Color balance was a little off with some preset modes, for example, including the brightest mode, which showed a green tint at some gray levels. However the grays were suitably neutral in other modes, including the default setting as shipped.

More important for a data projector, both white on black and black on white text was crisp and readable down to the smallest sizes we test with, at 6.8 points, and test images that are designed to show pixel jitter were nearly as rock solid with an analog VGA connection as with a digital HDMI connection.

Video image quality was also good for a data projector. I saw some moderately obvious noise in some scenes. However, I didn't see any posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually), even in scenes that tend to cause the problem, and the projector did a good job with skin tones and shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas). You won't mistake the PJD6553w for a home theater projector, but its video is certainly watchable.

Both data and video image quality are also helped by a relative lack of rainbow artifacts, with bright areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows. Some people are more sensitive than others to this rainbow effect, but it's always a potential issue for single-chip DLP projectors.

With the PJD6553w I saw very few rainbow artifacts with data images, and most were in images designed to make the rainbows easy to see. I saw more with video, which is typical for a DLP projector, but far fewer than with many DLP data projectors. Even most people who see the rainbows easily, as I do, aren't likely to see them often enough to find them annoying with data images or consider them more than a minor annoyance with video.

Other Issues

The audio system in the PJD6553w is better than average for this weight class. The 10W mono speaker delivers high enough quality to make dialogue in a movie understandable, along with enough volume to fill a small room.

Also worth mention is 3D support. As with most DLP-Link projectors, the support is more than a little limited, with the most notable issue being the need to buy DLP-Link glasses. Prices are slowly dropping, but most glasses are $70 or more each, which can quickly add up. Note too that ViewSonic doesn't supply any glasses with the projector. If you need 3D, however, the projector can support it.

By any reasonable measure, the ViewSonic projector delivers a winning combination of good to excellent data image quality, usable video, a bright image, and the convenience of a 1.3x zoom. If you must have the brightest possible image, the Optoma TW762 may be the better choice. And if you can benefit from a short throw lens, you'll want to look at the Optoma TW610ST. However, the ViewSonic PJD6553w is a strong enough contender that if you're considering either of those options, you should be giving it a close look as well.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

The ViewSonic PJD6553w data projector offers a 3,500 lumen rating and a sub-six-pound weight. - ViewSonic PJD6553w

ViewSonic PJD6553w

4.0 Excellent

The ViewSonic PJD6553w delivers a bright, high quality data image, a reasonably watchable video image, and the convenience of a 1.3X zoom lens.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio