PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

InFocus IN119HDx

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
InFocus IN119HDx - InFocus IN119HDx
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The InFocus IN119HDx 1080p business projector is bright enough for a small-to-midsize room, light enough to carry with you, and surprisingly affordable.
Best Deal£521.56

Buy It Now

£521.56

Pros & Cons

    • Suitably bright for a small-to-midsize room.
    • Extremely low price for the resolution.
    • Light enough to carry.
    • 1,920-by-1,080 resolution is suitable for showing fine detail.
    • Shows frequent rainbow artifacts with full-motion video.
    • Notable level of fan noise.
    • Red, blue, and yellow are all dark in some preset modes.

InFocus IN119HDx Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces MHL
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 3200
Warranty 12
Weight 5.4

If you need a high-resolution business projector for showing detailed data images, the InFocus IN119HDx ($549) may sound almost too good to be true. It combines a low price, 1080p (1,920-by-1,080) resolution, and suitable brightness for a small-to-midsize room, and is also light enough to carry with you. That makes it of obvious interest, particularly if you're on a tight budget or need the portability.

What's most striking about the IN119HDx ($725.00 at Amazon) is its low price. Compared with the Panasonic PT-RZ370U , which is our Editors' Choice high-resolution data projector for midsize rooms, it costs significantly less. The Panasonic model is meant primarily for permanent installation, and is loaded with expensive features, like lens shift. A more telling comparison is to the BenQ MH630 ($569.99 at Amazon) , which offers similar brightness, size, and features, but still costs more. It also weighs more, making the IN119HDx the more portable of the two.

Brightness

InFocus rates the projector's brightness at 3,200 lumens. As with the vast majority of single-chip DLP models, however, the IN119HDx has significantly lower color brightness than white brightness, which can affect both color quality and the brightness of color images. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why It Matters.)

That said, using the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations as a point of reference, 3,200 lumens would be bright enough with a 1.0-gain screen in theater-dark lighting for a 221- to 299-inch image (measured diagonally) at the projector's native 16:9 aspect ratio. In moderate ambient light, the appropriate size would drop to about 145 inches. For smaller screen sizes, you can lower the projector's brightness by taking advantage of its Eco mode, its lower-brightness presets, or both.

Setup, Image Quality, and Audio

At 4.7 by 11.5 by 8.7 inches (HWD) and 5 pounds 6 ounces, the IN119HDx is easily small and light enough to carry on the go or store away easily when you're not using it, but also appropriate for placement on a cart or permanent installation. Setup is standard, with a manual focus and a manual 1.3X zoom. Connectors for image sources are limited to two VGA ports for computers and component video, one HDMI port for a computer or video source, and both S-video and composite video ports. The HDMI port supports 3D with video devices like Blu-ray players.

Related Story See How We Test Projectors

Our standard suite of DisplayMate tests turned up more problems with the IN119HDx than is typical, making the quality for data images well short of excellent, but still good enough for most purposes.

As is common for projectors with a difference between white brightness and color brightness, colors are nicely saturated, but some—including red, blue, and yellow—are notably dark in terms of a hue-saturation-brightness model in some predefined modes. In addition, I saw a noticeable lack of brightness uniformity in the test unit and an annoying level of dynamic moiré in patterns designed to bring out that issue.

The lack of brightness uniformity, with the left side of the screen cooler than the middle section, was significant enough in testing to see even with a screen full of text breaking up the visual field. However, it's unlikely that anyone will find it bothersome. The same can't be said of the dynamic moiré, but unless you use patterned fills rather than solid blocks of color in your graphics, you may never see the problem. You can also avoid it entirely by using a digital (HDMI) connection instead.

The IN119HDx does an excellent job holding detail. White text on black, for example, was crisp and readable at sizes as small as 6 points in my tests. Black text on white was highly readable at sizes as small as 5 points. It also helps that the image is nearly free of rainbow artifacts (flashes of red, green, and blue) for static data images.

Unfortunately, rainbow artifacts show often enough with full-motion video to be annoying to anyone who's sensitive to them and bothered by them. Video quality is acceptable otherwise, but lengthy video clips are best avoided, in case there's anyone in your audience who sees these artifacts easily.

If you need sound, plan on plugging an external system into the IN119HDx's stereo audio output. The built-in, 2-watt speaker offers acceptable sound quality if you're close enough, but the volume is too low to fill even a small room. The fan is also louder than typical, with a 30dB rating even in Eco mode, and easy to hear from 15 feet away. I'm not usually bothered by fan noise, but found it hard to ignore. If it's one of your pet peeves, you'll almost certainly find it annoying.

Conclusion

If you need a top-quality, high-resolution image for a permanently installed projector, and you're not on a tight budget, the Panasonic PT-RZ370U is still the obvious choice. It's also worth looking at in any case, just to see what you're giving up with lower-cost models. If you want to stay with a low price, but are willing to pay a bit more for a bit better image quality, you should certainly take a look at the BenQ MH630. However, if price or portability matters most, the InFocus IN119HDx belongs in the running, with a lower price than the BenQ model, a lighter weight, and enough bang for the buck to make it a more-than-reasonable choice.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

InFocus IN119HDx - InFocus IN119HDx

InFocus IN119HDx Review

3.5 Good

The InFocus IN119HDx 1080p business projector is bright enough for a small-to-midsize room, light enough to carry with you, and surprisingly affordable.

Get It Now
Best Deal£521.56

Buy It Now

£521.56

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio