PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson ES3000

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson ES3000 - Epson ES3000
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Epson ES3000 portable projector screen can open to your choice of 4:3, 16:9, or 16:10 aspect ratios to match the data or video content that you're showing.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Small, light, and portable for the screen size.
    • Opens to 4:3, 16:9, and 16:10 aspect ratios.
    • Screen height adjustment.
    • Does not lock in place at the full width for 16:9 aspect ratio.

Similar in concept to the Epson Duet screen that I reviewed as part of the Epson MovieMate 33 ($999 direct, 3.5 stars) several years ago, the Epson ES3000 ($249.99 direct) offers the same key feature, namely, the ability to open to more than one aspect ratio. For the original version of the Duet the choices were 4:3 and 16:9. The ES3000 goes one step—or, more precisely, one aspect ratio—further, with choices of 4:3, 16:9, and 16:10. (An upgraded version of the Duet, with 16:10 added, is still available by itself, even though the MovieMate 33 isn't.) The ES3000 offers some other nice touches too, making it a particularly attractive choice for an all- purpose portable projector screen.

Portability is a relative term, of course, or as I've been known to point out, anything can be portable if you have a big enough truck. Compared with, say, the Epson ES1000 ($129.99, 4 stars), which weighs 6.5 pounds and can fit in an airplane's overhead bin, the ES3000 looks pretty big, at 22.1 pounds by itself or 43.7 pounds stored in its hard-shell wheeled carrying case. On the other hand, it's small and light enough to move around, especially given the wheels on the 9- by 46- by 8-inch (HWD) carrying case. It's certainly transportable if not fully portable.

Setup
Setting up the ES3000 is reasonably easy. The screen material is rolled up in a screen case that's designed to open horizontally, one half to the left and one half to the right of the stand. When the unit is in the carrying case, the stand folds so the lower part of the stand is actually folded up to sit next to the screen case.

To set up, you take the unit out of the carrying case, and unfold the stand so the hinge locks into place. Then you release the tripod foot lock and slide it down the stand until the three legs lock into place. You can then set the mechanical slide adjustment on the back of the screen case to the aspect ratio you want. There are three clearly marked positions, one for each aspect ratio, with the slide clicking solidly into each position.

Next, you push a release button on each half the screen case to release the two sides, and pull the screen open from either side—the other side automatically opens along with it. The screen will theoretically open to the right width, and stay there. On our first review unit, however, this was true only for 4:3 and 16:10 aspect ratios. For 16:9, which is the widest, the screen refused to stay at the fully open position, rewinding itself to 64 inches wide, and a 16:9.7 aspect ratio. Epson says this is essentially expected behavior, but that the bounce back on most units is closer to 1 inch on each side instead of 3 inches. Indeed, on a second unit Epson sent, the screen stayed open at 68 inches wide, for a 16:9.2 aspect ratio—close enough to a true 16:9 to make little difference when projecting an image.

Size and Other Issues
For all three aspect ratios, the screen is 39 inches high, so the correct measurement for screen size would be 65 inches diagonally (52 inches wide) for a 4:3 aspect ratio, 73.6 inches diagonally (62.4 inches wide) for 16:10, and 79.5 inches diagonally (69.3 inches wide) for 16:9. By my measurements, the 4:3 and 16:10 aspect ratios were spot on. With the second review unit, the 16:9 setting was reasonably close to what it should be, at 78 inches diagonally rather than 79.

It's worth mention that the ES3000 offers essentially the same screen size as the Duet while cutting the weight down by about 11 pounds (not counting the ES3000's carrying case). It also makes handling and setup a little easier thanks to combining the screen and stand into a single unit, rather than two units, as with the Duet. And, finally, it adds a height adjustment that the Duet lacks, which gives you a little more flexibility for setting up your projector, since it lets you adjust screen height as an alternative to adjusting image height.

The issue about the screen not staying fully open in the 16:9 position is a little troublesome. However, even when it bounces back as much as the first test unit did, it's not a killer problem, since the screen is still perfectly usable, albeit with a smaller diagonal measurement.

Ultimately, the ES3000 is a potentially good solution for anyone who needs a screen occasionally, whether in a conference room for presentations or a family room for movie nights. It's particularly useful if you want the ability to close up the screen and let it sit unobtrusively in a corner when you're not using it, and then set it up quickly when you need it. The wheeled case, finally, also makes it a good choice if you need a relatively large screen you can lug with you when and as needed.

COMPARISON TABLE
Compare the Epson ES3000 with several other projectors side by side.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Epson ES3000 - Epson ES3000

Epson ES3000

4.0 Excellent

The Epson ES3000 portable projector screen can open to your choice of 4:3, 16:9, or 16:10 aspect ratios to match the data or video content that you're showing.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio