PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Amid Crash Bug, Intel Extends Warranty on 13th, 14th Gen Core Chips by 2 Years

Intel is refraining from issuing a formal recall. 'We stand behind our products,' the company says.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Michael Justin Allen Sexton/PCMag)

Intel is extending the warranty on its 13th and 14th Generation Core desktop processors due to a bug that is crashing and, in some cases, permanently damaging them.

Intel normally offers a three-year warranty for boxed desktop processors. But in a Thursday Reddit post, the company said, “In the coming days, we will be sharing more details on two-year extended warranty support for our boxed Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.”

“At the same time, we apologize for the delay in communications as this has been a challenging issue to unravel and definitively root cause,” the company added. 

The company has been slow to address lingering complaints about the desktop chips repeatedly crashing, which has prompted a few developers to call out and condemn Intel. The problem is especially severe since the chip bug in the affected Intel processors can both cause repeated crashing, and potentially lead to permanent degradation to the processor itself. 

The issue has prompted some consumers to demand Intel issue a formal recall; it's also facing a potential class-action lawsuit. But in Thursday’s statement, the chipmaker refrained from going the recall route. Instead, it will triage the problem through Intel’s official customer support, which can result in customers receiving a replacement CPU. 

“Intel is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process. We stand behind our products,” the company said. 

Still, this means affected consumers will have to engage with Intel's customer support, which can prove to be a hassle, requiring the user to send their affected CPU back to the company. One consumer also claims that Intel refused to offer replacements for two defective Core i9-14900K CPUs, claiming the chips weren't genuine.

In the meantime, Intel has blamed the problem on a software bug triggering the affected desktop chips to run at a higher voltage, which is likely causing that permanent damage. In response, the company plans on releasing a patch later this month. But the software fix is mainly designed to prevent the instability issues from cropping up. So far, Intel has only said the software fix might “provide some instability improvements” for processors already experiencing crash failures. Hence, many affected consumers wonder if their Intel processors have already become degraded and need to be turned in. 

The controversy has also sparked concerns that the chip issues can be traced to a manufacturing error involving “oxidation” during the fabrication process. In Thursday’s statement, Intel addressed the issue, calling it a “minor one that was addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in early 2023.” 

“The issue was identified in late 2022, and with the manufacturing improvements and additional screens implemented, Intel was able to confirm full removal of impacted processors in our supply chain by early 2024,” the company added. But in some bad news, Intel said the defect may have crept in and “persisted” into product inventory through early 2024. 

Still, Intel is portraying the oxidation issue as separate from the chip bug affecting 13th and 14th Generation desktop chips. “Minor manufacturing issues are an inescapable fact with all silicon products. Intel continuously works with customers to troubleshoot and remediate product failure reports and provides public communications on product issues when the customer risk exceeds Intel quality control thresholds,” the company added. 

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio