PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

US: CHIPS Act Bans Firms From Building New Fabs in China for 10 Years

If companies waste CHIPS Act funds or spend it on unauthorized things, 'we’ll claw back the money,' says US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

To prevent abuse of the CHIPS Act, the White House says companies that take the federal funding are barred from building new and advanced chip factories in China for the next decade. 

“They’re not allowed to use this money to invest in China, they can’t develop leading-edge technologies in China, they can’t send [their] latest technology overseas,” US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said in a Tuesday press briefing. "These are some of the most stringent taxpayer protections and guardrails we’ve ever had."

President Biden signed the $280 billion CHIPS Act into law last month, $52.7 billion of which is designed to bolster US-based semiconductor manufacturing and address future chip shortages.

Processor makers like Intel and Taiwan’s TSMC are looking forward to receiving the money to build and expand new factories in Ohio and Arizona, respectively. But taking the funding also risks restricting any efforts to establish new fabs in mainland China, one of the world’s biggest markets and the US’s major rival in technology. 

Raimondo said the restriction was added to prevent the CHIPS Act from compromising national security. According to the text, the CHIPS Act will only allow affected companies to expand existing factories in China that predominantly serve the country’s market and produce chips using older manufacturing technologies at the 28-nanometer node or higher. (For perspective, Intel is close to producing chips on a 7-nanometer node while TSMC is nearing production on 3-nanometer processors.)  

Raimondo said the Commerce Department is already assembling a team to ensure companies that receive funding obey the restrictions and don’t waste the funding. “CHIPS funds cannot be used for stock buybacks,” she added. “CHIPS funds are not intended to replace private capital.  That is key. We’re going to look after every nickel of taxpayer money.  Taxpayer funds are only used to fill gaps and secure other funding as loan guarantees, not to replace private capital.”

The CHIPS Act’s goal is to “help companies maximize the scale of their projects,” and essentially make them even larger, Raimondo said. But if companies are found violating the conditions, then the US government will enact provisions to “claw back” the funding. 

“We will use that clawback authority if, after giving the money to a company, they fail to start their project on time, fail to complete their project on time, fail to meet the commitments that they’ve made,” she added.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio