PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

First Tests: Adobe Photoshop for M1 Macs Is Quick, But Not Always 1.5x Faster

Still, the improvement is early evidence that M1-powered Macs can offer an advantage over competing machines for creative pros who use Adobe’s products frequently.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Adobe claims that the latest version of Photoshop, released on Wednesday, could run 50% faster on the Apple M1-equipped MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, and Mac mini. The first benchmark tests—including our own—are now available, and they don’t quite match this claim, but they do suggest that Photoshop users will see significant improvements over older versions of Photoshop that don’t run natively on the M1 processor. 

On all PCs we test, we run a Photoshop benchmark, applying a series of 10 filters to a stock PCMag image. What we found in our early tests: Our own Photoshop performance test is 16% faster when running the latest version of Photoshop on the M1-equipped MacBook Pro versus running the latest version of the Creative Cloud software we ran at the M1 Macs' launch late last year. Other benchmarks show even greater gains compared with older versions of Photoshop, which are intended for Intel processors and run in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer on Macs that use the M1 chip.


Testing Native Against Rosetta 

Adobe’s claim of 50% better performance is based on average results from many different Photoshop activities performed during the company’s internal tests. They include opening and running filters, and compute-heavy operations like Content-Aware Fill and Select Subject. Adobe notes that some of these operations “feel noticeably faster,” which will likely gratify photographers and other digital artists who use Photoshop all day long. 

Every artist uses Photoshop differently, of course, and so does every benchmark test. Our test involves timing how long it takes to apply a series of 10 filters and effects to a JPG image. While the test has evolved slightly over the years, many of the operations haven’t changed much since Photoshop CS6 was released nearly a decade ago. These include resizing the image, applying Watercolor and Stained Glass effects, and using several types of blur filters.

Here is the breakdown of how long our 10 test filters took on the new M1 version of the software (version 22.3), compared with how long it takes when we forced the same version to run in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer:

Adding up the per-filter figures, the entire test took 2 minutes and 17 seconds (2:17) on the 13-inch MacBook Pro with M1 processor running version 22.3 of Photoshop natively. When we ran the test a second time using version 22.3 in forced emulation mode, the entire test took 2 minutes and 31 seconds. While most people won't run the latest M1-native version of Photoshop in emulation mode, Adobe does recommend this approach if you run into any of the known bugs or compatibility issues.

The same test took 2 minutes and 43 seconds (2:43) when we tested the same laptop when it was released last fall, using the then-current Creative Cloud version of Photoshop (version 22.2) in emulation. Altogether, that's a 16% improvement with the optimized software running natively on the M1.

You can also see how the native version 22.3 results stack up against a few competing laptops in the chart below. Of course, the non-Apple systems are not using an M1-optimized version of the software.


Gains Depend on the Benchmark Composition

While our test uses many "classic" filters and effects that aren’t necessarily optimized to show off the capabilities of modern processors like the M1, we believe it’s representative of many real-world workflows.

Other tests use alternate workflows that tax a computer’s resources in different ways. One emerging benchmark is from Puget Systems, a small firm that builds PCs tailor-made to the complex workflows of digital artists. Like our test, the Puget benchmark includes image resizing and many blur effects, but it also adds the especially intense Content Aware Fill and Photo Merge tasks. Using a Mac mini running the Puget benchmark, PetaPixel demonstrated a 33% performance improvement. That’s double the improvement our test shows, though it’s not quite the 1.5x average that Adobe is claiming. 

Apple M1 chip

Still, even a 16% boost is impressive considering that improvements are limited to software tweaks alone. Photoshop running in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer on M1 Macs is already competitive with the results from many Intel Core i5- and Core i7-powered laptops running Photoshop natively. This means that laptops equipped with Apple’s silicon offer an unquestionable advantage over competing machines for creative pros who use Adobe’s products frequently. And the advantage is likely to grow as Apple releases even more efficient processors over the coming year and more app developers release M1 native versions of their apps. 

Adobe has already updated other apps and features in the Creative Suite to run natively on the M1, including Lightroom and Camera RAW. 

The company notes that there are a few parts of Photoshop that still don’t run natively on the M1, even in the latest version released this week. They include Invite to Edit Cloud Documents and Preset Syncing. If you frequently use these features, you may want to hold off updating your app to the latest version. Otherwise, the upgrade is a no-brainer for anyone running Photoshop on the latest Macs. 


[Editors' Note: This article was updated shortly after publication to add performance data from the M1 version of Photoshop running in forced Rosetta 2 emulation.]

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio