PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 - Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 is a wide Micro Four Thirds lens. It's incredibly sharp, but shows some color fringing and is on the pricey side.
Best Deal£362.07

Buy It Now

£362.07

Pros & Cons

    • Wide aperture.
    • Very sharp.
    • Compact.
    • Focus clutch system.
    • Expensive.
    • Shows some chromatic aberration.
    • Hood not included.

Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 Specs

Type Lens

The Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 ($799.99 direct)($849.98 at Amazon) is an impressively compact lens with a fast aperture and ultra-wide field of view for Micro Four Thirds cameras. Its field of view is equivalent to a 24mm lens on a full-frame camera. This ultra-wide design is great for landscape photography and for capturing action in tight spaces. It's sharper than equivalent lenses for competing mirrorless camera systems, but is pretty expensive and shows some chromatic aberration. Our Editors' Choice award for wide-angle prime lenses for compact interchangeable lens camera systems goes to another Olympus lens, the M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f1.8($349.00 at Amazon). That lens doesn't cover as wide of an angle, but it's a smidge faster, less expensive, and also impressively sharp.

The lens measures just 2.2 by 1.7 inches (HD) and weighs 4.6 ounces. Its barrel is made entirely of metal, which accounts for its weight. Autofocus is very quiet, and there's a large manual focus ring if you prefer to adjust focus on your own. Simply pull the ring back towards the base of the lens to switch to manual focus mode, and push it back forward when you want to go with autofocus. The close focus distance is 7.9 inches; when shooting close with a wide aperture it's possible to create a very shallow depth of field, which is often not the case with wide-angle optics.

The lens is not weather sealed, which is a concern to owners of the dust- and splash-proof Olympus OM-D E-M5($499.00 at Amazon). Olympus does not include a hood with the lens, but it does sell an accessory hood for $89.99; that's a bit much, and the clip-on design of the hood can make it hard to use the lens with filters. That's unfortunate as a polarizing filter is a useful accessory with such a wide lens—it will let you darken skies in landscape shots, or minimize reflections coming off of water.

The 24mm field of view can be a tough one for many photographers to master, as there are many elements to take into consideration in order to create a pleasing composition. It's one of the reasons that we give higher marks to the narrower 17mm lens. Shutterbugs who are looking to add a fast prime lens to supplement the kit zoom will likely find it a more useful tool.

If you are someone who sees the world in wide swaths, the image quality that the M.Zuiko 12mm lens delivers will not disappoint. We tested the lens on the OM-D E-M5, and used our standard 1,800 lines per picture height cutoff as a measure of acceptable sharpness. According to Imatest, the lens records 2,118 lines at its maximum aperture, and delivers impressive edge-to-edge sharpness. Stopping down to f/2.8 increases the score to 2,276 lines. It hits 2,439 lines at f/4, and peaks at 2,490 lines at f/5.6. There is a little bit of barrel distortion, about 0.8 percent, which is nominal for a lens of this type. The only real issue with the lens is that it's prone to chromatic aberration, which shows itself as purple and green color fringes in high contrast areas. We noticed this on our test chart, as well as during field use. It can be corrected in Lightroom, but can require a bit of work to clear up. Neither the Samsung 16mm f/2.4 Ultra Wide Pancake NX Lens($182.99 at Amazon) or the Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens($223.00 at Amazon), which provide equivalent fields of view for their respective systems, manage to cross the 1,800-line mark without having to close down their apertures, which limits the amount of light captured and doesn't allow for as shallow of a depth of field.

You need to be a lover of wide angles to truly appreciate the Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0, but if you master its field of view the lens will not disappoint. It's impressively sharp at every aperture, and videographers will appreciate just how quiet its focus motor is. It's pretty expensive, and some sort of lens hood really should be included with an $800 lens. Overall we feel that the narrower Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f1.8 is a better value—it doesn't capture nearly as wide of a field of view as the M.Zuiko 12mm, but it's $300 less expensive and delivers similar sharpness, without the chromatic aberration.

Best Camera Picks

Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 - Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0

Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 Review

3.5 Good

The Olympus M.Zuiko Lens 12mm f2.0 is a wide Micro Four Thirds lens. It's incredibly sharp, but shows some color fringing and is on the pricey side.

Get It Now
Best Deal£362.07

Buy It Now

£362.07

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio