PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R - Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R is a solid budget option for Micro Four Thirds shooters looking for an affordable telephoto zoom lens.
Best Deal£177.27

Buy It Now

£177.27

Pros & Cons

    • Inexpensive.
    • Good telephoto zoom range.
    • Sharp through most of its zoom range.
    • Plastic lens mount.
    • Performance suffers at the edges of the frame.
    • Not optically stabilized.
    • Modest aperture.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R Specs

Type Lens

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R ($199.99 direct)($99.00 at Amazon) is one of the less expensive lenses you can attach to your Micro Four Thirds camera. It's designed to complement the entry-level M.Zuiko 14-42mm zoom that ships with Olympus PEN bodies like the E-PL5($249.99 at Amazon). It gives you the telephoto reach that the standard kit zoom can't manage, covering an 80-300mm field of view in terms of traditional 35mm photography. It doesn't have an ambitious aperture, and it's not as sharp from edge to edge as more expensive lenses, but it performs well in good light, bringing distant objects into clear view.

The lens is light and compact when you consider its focal range. It measures 3.3 by 2.5 inches (HD), weighs just 6.7 ounces, and supports 58mm filters. The front element doesn't rotate when zooming or focusing, so using a polarizing filter is not an issue, but the lens does double in height when zoomed to the 150mm position. The barrel is plastic, with a large textured zoom ring and a narrower manual focus ring. There's no optical stabilization, but that's only a concern if you want to pair the lens with a Panasonic Micro Four Thirds camera; Olympus bodies have built-in stabilization.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R : Sample Image

I used Imatest to check the sharpness 40-150mm when paired wth the OM-D E-M1($799.95 at Amazon). At 40mm f/4 it manages a center-weighted score of 1,746 lines per picture height, which is just a smidge shy of the 1,800 lines we used to qualify an image as acceptably sharp. Edge performance is weak here at just 1,233 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 improves the performance; it scores 2,047 lines there, with edges that approach a more respectable 1,600 lines. If the light allows for it, you'll want to shoot at f/8 for the sharpest results. You get 2,281 lines across the frame, with edges that cross the 1,900-line mark. Barrel distortion is just barely a concern here. The lens exhibits 1.1 percent, which won't be noticeable in most situations, and can be easily be corrected for in Lightroom or similar software when perfectly straight lines are a requirement.

The lens sharpens as you zoom to 70mm. The maximum aperture here is f/4.6, and the Imatest score is 2,425 lines, with edges that top 1,800 lines and minimal distortion. That performance carries over to 100mm f/5; the sharpness score is 2,300 lines there with sharp edges. But there's a bit of a drop at 150mm. The aperture narrows to f/5.6 and the sharpness drops to 1,891 lines. Edge performance at 150mm is weak at just 1,396 lines. Stopping down to f/8 improves the overall score to just over 1,900 lines, but edges improve considerably—the 1,558-line score is still on the soft side, so you'll want to avoid framing your subject at the extreme edges of the frame when you're zoomed all the way in.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R : Sample Image

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R doesn't capture as much light as more expensive lenses, and its performance suffers a bit at its widest angle and its telephoto extreme. But it delivers solid performance through the rest of its zoom range. Its aperture isn't that wide, so the lens is best used in ample light; you'll need to increases your camera's ISO in order to get a sharp shot in dim light. But at $200 it's a good value, especially if you're willing to work within its limitations.

Best Camera Picks

Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R - Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R Review

3.5 Good

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R is a solid budget option for Micro Four Thirds shooters looking for an affordable telephoto zoom lens.

Get It Now
Best Deal£177.27

Buy It Now

£177.27

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio