PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

YouTube to Restore Trump's Access, But Only if the Risk of Violence Goes Down

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki said the platform's intention is to one day restore Trump's access to his channel.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

(Credit: YouTube)


Former President Donald Trump will one day regain access to his YouTube channel—but only if the potential for more political violence has died down, YouTube said on Thursday.

“We will lift the suspension of the Donald Trump channel when we determine the risk of violence has decreased,” YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki said during a talk with the Atlantic Council, a US think tank. “That’s per our policies. That’s how our three-strikes system works,” she added. 

YouTube was among the social media platforms that suspended or banned Trump’s access after his supporters stormed the US Capitol on Jan. 6. Since then, the suspensions have remained in place over concerns Trump could continue to cast doubt on the election results, and thus spark more violence. 

YouTube initially suspended Trump's account for seven days; it later extended that ban "for an additional minimum of seven days." During her talk with the Atlantic Council, Wojcicki said YouTube served Trump’s YouTube channel with one strike for uploading content that broke the platform’s rules. 

To determine when the risk of violence has decreased, Wojcicki said YouTube will look at government statements and warnings on the matter, and the presence of law enforcement around the country.  

“We would also look at any kind of violent rhetoric that we’re seeing on our platform,” she said. “We have an intelligence desk where we look and try to understand everything and get ahead of what’s happening on our platform. So those are all different signals we would look at.”

Wojcicki couldn’t say when it might lift the suspension, but she added: “It’s pretty clear to me, right where we stand, there still is that elevated risk of violence.”

An audience member at the talk wondered why Trump’s channel was only given one strike when the former President had been casting doubt on the election results for months prior to the Jan. 6 riot. The Trump channel itself had uploaded a number of videos alleging voter fraud, which YouTube later determined violated its policies. 

Wojcicki explained the platform’s ban against videos claiming the 2020 election was fraudulent went into place on Dec. 9, and included a one-month “grace period” on handing out strikes. Hence, Trump’s YouTube channel received no penalties for posting the videos.

Wojcicki's comments set the stage for Trump's eventual return to the platform, and highlight how the former president can game YouTube's three-strike system to post rule-breaking videos while still avoiding a complete ban.

“When the (Trump) channel is reinstated, it will be subject to the same policies that every other channel follows,” she said. “So if we see any content that’s uploaded that in any way violates any of our policies, incitement to violence, or any kind of election integrity policy violations, then a second strike would be issued.

“When there are three strikes within a 90-day period, then the channel is removed,” she added. 

Another social media platform considering lifting the ban on Trump is Facebook. The company’s newly established Oversight Board plans to decide the matter in the coming weeks. Twitter has confirmed that its Trump ban is permanent.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio