PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

OmniPage Professional 18

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
OmniPage Professional 18 - OCR
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

OmniPage Professional 18 remains one of the most capable OCR programs on the planet, both for its core task of text recognition and its long list of related capabilities.

Pros & Cons

    • Fast recognition.
    • Improved interface with Start Page.
    • Cloud connectivity.
    • Strong on automation and other ancillary features.
    • Interface can be frustrating to use.

OmniPage Professional 18 Specs

OS Compatibility: Windows 7
OS Compatibility: Windows Vista
OS Compatibility: Windows XP
Tech Support: and email.
Tech Support: Phone
Tech Support: web
Type: Business
Type: Enterprise
Type: Personal
Type: Professional

Building on the solid foundation that was OmniPage Professional 17, Nuance OmniPage Professional 18 ($499.99 direct) offers all the same strengths, from fast speed to powerful automation tools. It also adds features, most notably cloud connectivity and a new tool for recognizing PDF files. And it improves its interface--precisely the issue that kept version 17 from being an Editors' Choice. Unfortunately, the interface can still be a bit frustrating to use. If you're willing to put up with it, though, OmniPage is one of the most capable OCR programs available, especially for high-volume, automated OCR applications.

When we reviewed OmniPage 17, one of the complaints we had about the interface was that, unlike Readiris Corporate 12 ($399 direct, 2.5 stars) or the current Editors' Choice ABBYY FineReader 10 ($399 direct, 4.5 stars), OmniPage didn't offer a startup menu of common tasks, such as scanning to a PDF or Word file.

That objection has been addressed in OmniPage 18 with a Start Page that offers a list of common tasks. Click on a task, and the program hand carries you through each step from scanning or loading a file to saving the result. The various choices start with a camera image, PDF file, or scanned document and end up with an Excel, Word, or OmniPage document; a Searchable PDF; or a speech file (a WAV file you can play like an audio book). Although the Start page can make some tasks easy however, it doesn't come into play if you bypass the options and go directly to OmniPage's more basic interface. But more on that later.

Accuracy
Top-tier OCR programs like OmniPage have long since reached the point where text recognition accuracy isn't much of an issue and is impractical to test for. With accuracy already in the range of 98 percent or better, a small improvement, like the claimed 18 percent greater accuracy for OmniPage Professional 18, is hard to confirm without testing hundreds, or even thousands, of originals.

The simple truth is that if you need 100 percent accuracy, you'll have to proofread the result. If you can live with occasional errors, my tests confirm that OmniPage 18 makes few recognition mistakes. I ran across a user review on one Web site recently that complained about OmniPage Professional 18 having one or two errors in every seven or eight pages. Assuming only 250 words per page, which is about the fewest you could expect for any page format, and two errors per eight pages, that would work out to one error every 1000 words, or 99.99 percent word accuracy. (The complaint obviously came from a seriously overboard perfectionist.)

Format accuracy is even harder to test for. Nuance claims a 67 percent improvement in OmniPage Professional 18, but if you try to test for formatting errors, the number you come up with will depend on both the originals you use and how you count errors. If the program makes the same mistake 100 times in one heavily formatted document, for example, you'll get a different number if you count it as a single mistake than if you count it as 100 separate mistakes.

The most useful information I can give is that with my suite of test files, when sending files to an editable format, OmniPage Professional 18 did at least as well as Readiris and FineReader overall. For most text pages, it created Word files that needed no fixes in the format, with only minor fixes needed in the rest.

It had a problem creating spreadsheets from tables that had more than one line of text per row in some cells, putting each line in its own spreadsheet row, and requiring time-consuming manual fixes. However, I have yet to see a program that does any better with this format.

Final Thoughts

OmniPage Professional 18 - OCR

OmniPage Professional 18

4.0 Excellent

OmniPage Professional 18 remains one of the most capable OCR programs on the planet, both for its core task of text recognition and its long list of related capabilities.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio