PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

DHS May Require US Citizens to Submit to Airport Facial Scans

Currently, US citizens can opt out of the facial scans, which have been occurring at major US airports. But last month, the Department of Homeland Security proposed amending the rule to require everyone submit to the facial scans.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The US government may make it mandatory for all travelers, including US citizens, to submit to a facial scan when traveling through an airport.

Current regulations can exempt US citizens from the facial scans on exit and entry into the country. But last month, the Department of Homeland Security proposed amending the rule to include US citizens with seemingly no way to opt out.

According to the posting, the rule change promises to help federal agents better identify suspected criminals and terrorists. Specifically, the agency points to the fraudulent use of legitimate US travel documents.

However, the proposed rule change has the American Civil Liberties Union alarmed. "Travelers, including US citizens, should not have to submit to invasive biometric scans simply as a condition of exercising their constitutional right to travel," said ACLU senior policy analyst Jay Stanley in a statement.

The facial scans from DHS have already been rolling out across more than a dozen US airports. Part of the goal has been to identify people who overstay their visas in the country. The technology works by snapping your photo at the airport and comparing it to existing images DHS already has on. This can include the headshot in your passport, a picture attached to a visa, and photos submitted with other travel documents.

In recent years, DHS says the technology has helped officials identify hundreds to thousands of people who've been residing illegally in the country. But the same technology has sparked concerns about privacy, surveillance, and if the government is collecting too much sensitive data from millions of everyday travelers.

"Time and again, the government told the public and members of Congress that US citizens would not be required to submit to this intrusive surveillance technology as a condition of traveling," Stanley added. "This new notice suggests that the government is reneging on what was already an insufficient promise."

Another potential problem is securing the data. Earlier this year, hackers managed to steal photos and license plate images of cars from US Customs and Border Protection by infiltrating a third-party subcontractor.

DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the proposed rule change. But the government has an FAQ page about the facial scanning practice, which says all photos of US citizens collected from the process are discarded within 12 hours of identity verification.

That all said, most US citizens are probably unaware that they can decline a facial scan through the existing rule. As the privacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation notes, it's up to the traveler to tell either a customs official or the airline employee they'd like to opt out of the process. "For those who can opt out, you'll need to spot the surveillance when it's happening," the group said back in April. "Once you're at the airport, be on the lookout for any time a TSA, CBP, or airline employee asks you to look into a device."

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio