PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

HP: Here's Why Merging With Xerox Is a Bad Idea

HP has rejected Xerox's threat of a hostile takeover bid by essentially characterizing the printer maker as a company on the decline.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

HP this weekend pushed back on Xerox's hostile takeover bid in a letter that characterizes the printer maker as deadweight that risks dragging down HP's business. The same letter also wonders whether Xerox can even raise the cash to buy HP.

"The HP Board of Directors is committed to serving the best interests of HP shareholders, not Xerox and its shareholders," the company said in the letter, which added: "We will not let aggressive tactics or hostile gestures distract us from our responsibility to pursue the most value-creating path."

One of HP's main complaints is Xerox's sagging revenue, which has been posting year-over-year declines in recent financial quarters. "Xerox's revenue has fallen from $10.2 billion to $9.2 billion (on a trailing 12-month basis) since June 2018, and this is expected to continue," the letter notes.

The PC maker also disagrees with Xerox's key reason for proposing the merger: that it'll save both companies $2 billion in costs over two years. HP last month already announced it was cutting up to 16 percent of its workforce, so the company doesn't expect a merger with Xerox to produce major savings.

The other problem is Xerox's recent decision to sell the company's stake in Fujifilm for $2.3 billion. According to HP, "Xerox essentially mortgaged its future for a short-term cash infusion," all the while leaving a "sizeable strategic hole" in the printer maker's technology portfolio, the company claimed in the letter.

"In addition, we have concerns as to the state of Xerox's technology resources, research and development pipeline, future product programs, and supply continuity and capability," HP added. "Finally, we note that Xerox will have to get access to the fastest growing Asia Pacific region."

So far, Xerox hasn't responded to the letter. But last week, the printer maker threatened HP with a hostile takeover bid unless the two held a meeting by Nov. 25 to go over the details of a potential acquisition. Xerox is offering to buy HP at $22 per share, or $33.5 billion.

"The overwhelming support our offer will receive from HP shareholders should resolve any further doubts you have regarding the wisdom of swiftly moving forward to complete the transaction," Xerox wrote at the time.

HP isn't completely killing off the idea of a merger. But the company claims Xerox has no interest in going over the fine details of whether the deal makes business sense. According to HP, Xerox brought up the potential merger in private discussions back in August and September. But during all that time, Xerox declined to let HP carry out "due diligence" and scrutinize the printer maker's business.

"We repeatedly raised our questions; you failed to address them and instead walked away, choosing to pursue a hostile approach rather than continue down a more productive path," HP said in the letter. "But these fundamental issues have not gone away, and your now-public urgency to accelerate toward a deal, still without addressing these questions, only heightens our concern about your business and prospects."

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio