PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Google to Limit Political Ad Targeting On Search, YouTube

Going forward, election ads on Google search and YouTube will only be able to target users based on their age, gender and zip code. Before, campaigns could target users based on public voting records and political affiliation.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Google is going to ban political ads that target users based on their public voting records or political affiliations.

Instead, election ads on Google search, YouTube, and over the company's display ad network, will only be able to target users based on their age, gender and zip code, the company said in a blog post on Wednesday.

The company is making the change, pointing to "recent concerns and debates" concerning political advertising. The scrutiny has focused on Facebook and how the social network is permitting political candidates to run ads free of any fact-checking.

Under Facebook's policies, political advertisers can also "microtarget" specific users with ads while everyone else will never encounter the content. Critics, including the chairwoman of the Federal Election Commission, say this is a problem: It means a political ad can potentially spread falsehoods to certain voters completely unchallenged by the rest of the public.

In Google's case, the company says it never allowed "granular microtargeting" of political ads. Nevertheless, it did offer ad buyers the option of targeting users based on their public voting record or political affiliation such as "left-leaning, right-leaning, and independent."

To determine the affiliation, Google told PCMag the company looked at the personal information users added to their Google accounts, "data from advertisers that partner with Google, and Google's estimation of their interests." (If that sounds creepy, you can control or opt out of the the ad personalization.)

But now the company plans on removing the targeting options within week, first starting in the UK, before Google rolls out the restrictions across the globe in January. The company is doing so to help ensure the public-at-large can easily see what political ads are being run over the internet.

"Regardless of the cost or impact to spending on our platforms, we believe these changes will help promote confidence in digital political advertising and trust in electoral processes worldwide," wrote Google vice president Scott Spencer in the blog post.

The company is also restricting what falsehoods can be run over a political ad. Google plans on clarifying that it'll no longer accept ads that contain doctored or manipulated media, such as AI-generated video. Ads that try to mislead about the census process or discourage people from trusting or voting in an election are now explicitly banned.

But don't expect Google to crack down on any political ads that contain controversial claims, exaggerations, or even lies. "Of course, we recognize that robust political dialogue is an important part of democracy, and no one can sensibly adjudicate every political claim, counterclaim, and insinuation," Spencer added. "So we expect that the number of political ads on which we take action will be very limited —but we will continue to do so for clear violations."

Google issued the blog post as Facebook is also reportedly considering a ban that'll prevent political ads from targeting specific users. However, President Donald Trump's re-election campaign appears to be against such a ban.

Twitter, on the other hand, recently decided to end all political advertising from candidates, parties and political groups.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio