PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Amazon's Facial Recognition Tech Collides With Shareholder Protest

Whether Amazon can sell its controversial facial recognition technology to government groups and police departments may be determined by a shareholders' vote later this spring.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Should Amazon be able to sell the company's facial recognition technology to police and government agencies? The question may come down to a shareholders' vote later this spring.

On Thursday, a group of Amazon investors said it filed a resolution to put the matter up for vote at the company's annual shareholders meeting. Their goal: To prevent the company's facial recognition system from ever being exploited for mass surveillance.

The resolution calls on Amazon's board of directors to halt all facial recognition system sales to government agencies until it can conclude the technology poses no threat to civil and human rights.

The resolution was partly sponsored by the Sisters of St. Joseph of Brentwood, which is a member of a Roman Catholic investment group, the Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment.

"We filed this proposal because we are concerned that Amazon has pitched facial recognition technology to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and piloted its Rekognition with police departments, without fully assessing potential human rights impacts," said Sister Patricia Mahoney of St. Joseph of Brentwood in a statement. Four other shareholder groups have also backed the proposal.

Amazon Rekognition Police 3

But it isn't the first time shareholders have expressed worries over the tech giant's facial recognition technology. Last June, several investors sent a letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos demanding he introduce safeguards to rein in the technology before it can be sold to government buyers.

Both civil rights groups and even Amazon's own employees have also spoken up in protest against the company's facial recognition technology, citing the same mass surveillance fears. But so far, Amazon hasn't backed down from selling the technology to governments. In its defense, the company has repeatedly pointed to real-life cases of police officers and investigators using Amazon's facial recognition systems to stop crimes.

"This technology is being implemented in ways that materially benefit society, and we have received no indications of misuse," an Amazon spokesperson told PCMag.

The company's Rekognition product can let you search through a database of photos and pluck out the images that match a particular face. This can be a powerful tool for law enforcement when it comes to criminal investigations. For instance, Amazon's system can scour the internet to see if anyone has uploaded a new photo of an abducted person. It can also be used to examine hours of surveillance footage to find the presence of a criminal suspect.

But on the flip side, critics worry that the same technology will make mistakes, especially when it comes to identifying people of color. Another concern is the potential for abuse, like tracking you without your consent, and whether Amazon has the ability to stop it.

"It's a familiar pattern: a leading tech company marketing what is hailed as breakthrough technology without understanding or assessing the many real and potential harms of that product," said Michael Connor, the executive director of the activist group Open MIC, which helped organize the shareholder resolution.

It isn't clear if Amazon will try to oppose the shareholders' vote. But in the past, the company has said any misuse of its facial recognition technology for illegal activities, such as violating the rights of others, will result in a ban.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio