PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

FCC Rejects ISP Complaints About Listing Every Fee on Broadband Labels

Some ISPs lobbied the FCC to relax the requirement about listing all the additional fees subscribers can pay for their broadband services. But the US regulator refused to budge.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The FCC has denied an effort from several ISPs to dissolve a requirement that’ll force them to list all the fees subscribers have to pay for their broadband services. 

The requirement is part of the FCC’s new broadband labels, which are designed to make it easy for consumers to understand the pricing and performance of a broadband plan, much like today’s nutrition fact labels. For months now, internet service providers have been complaining that listing all the recurring monthly fees is too burdensome because the costs can vary by area, forcing the creation of potentially thousands of different labels. 

As a result, the ISPs and their lobbying groups urged the FCC to loosen the requirements. But this week, the FCC rejected the petitions, saying it’s necessary to preserve consumer access to accurate information about the costs and performance of broadband services on the market.  

“Every consumer needs transparent information when making decisions about what internet service offering makes the most sense for their family or household. No one wants to be hit with charges they didn’t ask for or they did not expect,” said FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement

An example of what the broadband labels will look like.

The order from the FCC adds that the ISPs were hoping to simplify the labeling requirement by allowing them to “display an ‘up to’ price for certain fees they choose to pass through to consumers.” But the Commission rejected the request to maintain the broadband labels’ simplicity, and prevent the ISPs from loading them with “potentially complex and lengthy details about data allowances on the label.”

That said, the FCC did make some small changes and clarifications to the broadband labeling process. This includes “modifying provider record-keeping requirements when directing consumers to a label on an alternative sales channel and confirming that providers may state ‘taxes included’ when their price already incorporates taxes,” the regulator said. 

The FCC adds that the broadband label rules will go into effect after a legally required review from the US Office of Management and Budget. “After this Paperwork Reduction Act analysis is complete, the majority of providers will have to display the label within six months of approval; providers with 100,000 or fewer subscriber lines face a deadline of twelve months,” the Commission added.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio