PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple Pro Display XDR vs. Apple Studio Display XDR: The 6K Legend Meets Its 5K Successor

Apple is retiring its elite 6K Pro Display XDR in favor of the 5K Studio Display XDR, a more affordable 27-inch monitor. Should you hunt down the old model before it's gone, or opt for the new one?

 & Tony Hoffman Senior Writer, Hardware

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Apple Pro Display XDR

Apple Pro Display XDR

4.0 Excellent

Bottom Line

Apple's Pro Display XDR provides exceptional color accuracy and build quality at a price that's quite competitive with those of reference-grade pro monitors. It's exquisite enough that swallowing the wildly extravagant cost of its Pro Stand is worth it.

Best Deal£4599

Buy It Now

£4599

VS

Apple Studio Display XDR

Apple Studio Display XDR

4.0 Excellent

Bottom Line

With exceptional HDR performance and a robust mix of reference modes, Apple's Studio Display XDR is a compelling centerpiece for serious Mac creators that's smaller than, but also much cheaper than, the venerable Pro Display XDR.

Buy It Now

Price: Simply Elite vs. Astronomical

The base price for the Apple Studio Display XDR is $3,299. According to Apple, the 27-inch screen’s standard glass is engineered for extremely low reflectivity, but you can opt for nano-texture glass, which further minimizes reflectivity, for $300 extra.

Included in the base price is your choice of either a stand, which supports height and tilt adjustment, or VESA-mounting hardware for wall- or arm-mounting the monitor. Either way, you shell out a good chunk of change for the Studio Display XDR, especially considering that some of our favorite Mac-friendly creator displays—the Asus ProArt 6K PA32QCV, BenQ PD3225U, and Asus ProArt OLED PA32UCDM among them—cost around half its price or less.

Price-wise, however, the older Pro Display XDR is in a league of its own. It has a steep base price ($4,999), and that’s even before being nickel-and-dimed (or in Apple’s case, C-note-and-granded?) for its accessories. It comes without a stand—or even VESA-mounting hardware; Apple’s Pro Stand will set you back another thousand dollars if you can even find it nowadays through a third party, as it's also been discontinued; the VESA hardware costs $200. And to get the version of the Pro Display XDR with the nano-texture screen treatment would set you back yet another grand. (Of course, the Pro Display XDR is a bigger panel, at 32 inches, so there is that partial offset.)

Winner: Studio Display XDR


Screen: Exquisite Contrast, High Brightness, Abundant Reference Modes

The Apple Studio Display XDR’s 27-inch panel is a 5K Retina XDR display with a 5,120-by-2,880-pixel resolution and a pixel density of 218 pixels per inch (ppi). XDR, which stands for "Extreme Dynamic Range," is a marketing term Apple uses to distinguish its monitors that push brightness, contrast, and color beyond standard HDR.

Featuring mini-LED backlighting with 2,304 individual dimming zones, the Studio Display XDR has a rated SDR brightness of up to 1,000 nits, with a peak HDR brightness of up to 2,000 nits. Its rated contrast ratio is 1,000,000:1. Contrast ratio is defined as the brightness difference between the brightest white tones and the darkest blacks, so this implies that the Studio Display XDR can turn off (fully blacken) the pixels within dimming zones.

(Credit: Apple)

Apple highlights the Studio Display XDR’s ”access to” P3 and Adobe RGB, though it doesn’t specify what percentage of those color spaces the panel is supposed to cover. Both P3 and Adobe RGB are accessible from the same default preset. The monitor offers a big host of reference modes, including the following:

  • Studio Display XDR (P3-2000 nits)
  • Studio Display XDR (P3 + Adobe RGB-2000 nits)
  • HDR Video (P3-ST 2084)
  • HDTV Video (BT.709-BT.1886)
  • NTSC Video (BT.601 SMPTE-C)
  • PAL and SECAM Video (BT.601 EBU)
  • Digital Cinema (P3-DCI and P3-D65 modes)
  • Design and Print (P3-D50 and Adobe RGB-D50 modes)
  • Photography (P3-D65 and Adobe RGB-D65 modes)
  • HDR Photography (P3-D65)
  • Internet and Web (sRGB)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM-350 nits and DICOM-600 nits modes)

The 32-inch Pro Display XDR has a 6,016-by-3,384-pixel, aka 6K, native resolution, and it is rated for the same 218ppi pixel density as the Studio Display XDR. Its peak HDR brightness is rated at up to 1,600 nits, with SDR brightness at 500 nits. Apple has noted that the Pro's LED-backlit IPS display employs a feature known as "full-array local dimming," or FALD for short, which allows 576 different areas of the scene to be brightened or dimmed independently. This sounds a lot like the new model’s dimming zones, although the Studio Display XDR has four times as many as the Pro Display XDR. Apple rates the Pro's contrast ratio at the same 1,000,000:1.

Apple rates the Pro Display XDR for 99% DCI-P3 coverage, and it effectively matched that in our testing. It offers many of the reference modes (or variants) that the Studio version does, though not the DICOM medical imaging. That's new with the Studio Display XDR and could be a deciding factor for medical use in Mac-based practices or labs.

While the Studio Display XDR has a 120Hz refresh rate and supports (unspecified) adaptive sync, the Pro Display XDR lacks adaptive-sync support and is limited to 60Hz. Also, as mentioned earlier, as an alternative to the standard screen, Apple offers a low-reflectivity nano-texture glass option for both the Pro Display XDR and the Studio Display XDR. This option costs $1,000 for the Pro Display XDR, or $300 for the Studio Display XDR.

The Studio Display XDR offers many screen enhancements over the Pro Display XDR. It does so at the expense of screen real estate, as the Pro Display XDR's screen is 40% larger by area than the Studio's. The choice comes down to which you value more: the size of your screen, or the enhanced features that the newcomer offers. To me, it comes out as a wash in the big picture.

Winner: Draw


Ergonomics: Adjustable Stand vs. Optional VESA Hardware

The Studio Display XDR comes with your choice of a tilt- and height-adjustable stand or VESA-mounting hardware for wall- or arm-mounting. When using the stand, you can tilt the monitor's screen up to 25 degrees away from you or 5 degrees toward you, and adjust the height up to 4.1 inches.

(Credit: Apple)

In contrast, the Pro Display XDR ships without a stand. The $1,000 Apple Pro Stand has been discontinued and is no longer available through major retailers. It is unclear whether the numerous university bookstores that still offer it at the moment (for online order only) will be able to fulfill many orders. VESA mounting (its hardware a $200 extra) may be the only option for many.

Winner: Studio Display XDR (by a first-round knockout)


Connectivity: Thunderbolt and USB-C

Port selection for both these monitors is limited to Thunderbolt and USB-C.

The Studio Display XDR has one upstream (meaning that it can connect to a computer or other data or video input source) Thunderbolt 5 port for connecting to a Mac. It can also connect to other computer with Thunderbolt connectivity, or one that supports DisplayPort over USB-C, but the latter comes with limitations on controlling brightness, contrast, and other functionality. It also has a downstream Thunderbolt 5 port that can be used to daisy-chain a second Studio Display XDR or connect to peripherals. The upstream Thunderbolt 5 port, which offers 140-watt power delivery, can power and/or charge a MacBook connected to it. In addition, you get two downstream USB-C ports for connecting to peripherals.

The Pro Display XDR also has four ports: an upstream Thunderbolt 3 port with 96 watts of power delivery, and three downstream USB-C ports.

Winner: Studio Display XDR


Audio and Video: The Sound System and the Webcam

The Studio Display XDR has a built-in 12-megapixel Center Stage webcam. It also incorporates a six-speaker sound system with force-cancelling woofers, which supports spatial audio when playing music or video with Dolby Atmos. It also packs a three-microphone array. It does not have an audio-out jack, but the monitor is otherwise a ready-to-go audio solution.

The Pro Display XDR, in contrast, lacks both a webcam and an audio system. It also doesn't have an audio jack, so any audio signal must be routed from your computer, whether to headphones or external speakers. It's designed for use in a professional environment that's already equipped with solutions for audio and video conferencing.

Winner: Studio Display XDR


Audience: Mac-Based Graphic Artists and Studios

Both the Studio Display XDR and the Pro Display XDR are strongly geared to Mac-based artists. They can be used with Windows PCs that support DisplayPort over USB-C, but some features, such as control over brightness and contrast controls, may be compromised or disabled.

The Pro Display XDR's sky-high price limits its appeal to successful artists, graphic arts design/production studios, and wealthy show-offs. The Studio Display XDR is no doubt expensive, too, but it offers excellent value to those who can afford it, including startups and a broader range of creative professionals.

Winner: Studio Display XDR

About Our Expert

Tony Hoffman

Tony Hoffman

Senior Writer, Hardware

Since 2004, I have worked on PCMag’s hardware team, covering at various times printers, scanners, projectors, storage, and monitors. I currently focus my efforts on 3D printers, pro and productivity displays, and drives and SSDs of all sorts.

Over the years, I have reviewed smart telescopes, iPad and iPhone science apps, plus the occasional camera, laptop, keyboard, and mouse. I've also written a host of articles about astronomy, space science, travel photography, and astrophotography for PCMag and its past and present sibling publications (among them, Mashable and ExtremeTech), as well as for the former PCMag Digital Edition.

The Technology I Use

I have a Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptop that's my work daily driver, an HP Pavilion Aero 13 as my primary personal laptop, and an Asus ProArt P16 for detailed photo work. (I also have an older Dell XPS 13, which now stays at home full-time.) For storage testing, I rely on our three custom-built Windows testbeds in PC Labs, as well as a 2024 MacBook Pro.

My primary home monitor is a BenQ EX2780Q, a gaming monitor with a great sound system and excellent image quality. I use that panel for writing, watching videos, and working with photos. I also have an HP 27 Curved Display—one of the first general-purpose curved monitors—which I have paired with an Acer Aspire desktop computer. My multifunction printer is an Epson Expression Premium XP-7100 Small-in-One. I also own an Epson Perfection V39 flatbed scanner, which I use for photos and short documents, and a Canon Selphy CP1300 small-format photo printer for turning out snapshots.

My first cell phone, in 2006, was a Motorola Razr; since then, it’s been all iPhones—I currently have an iPhone 15 Pro. I use my iPhone a lot for casual photography, though I also use a Sony DSC-RX100 VII and a Canon G5 X Mark II for everyday shooting. For much of my travel photography and astrophotography, I use either a Sony A7r II or A7 III, paired with a variety of lenses ranging from a Sony 14mm f/1.8 prime to a Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS zoom lens. I also pair the A7r with a RedCat 51 for deep-sky star shooting. For astrophotography, I also use the Seestar S30 and S50 and the Unistellar Odyssey smart telescopes, which are essentially astronomical cameras controlled through one’s mobile device.

Read full bio