PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Xerox Phaser 6500/DN

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Xerox Phaser 6500/DN - Laser Printers
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Xerox Phaser 6500/DN color laser printer offers a highly attractive balance of speed, output quality, and paper handling for a small office or workgroup.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Fast.
    • Excellent paper handling for a small office or workgroup.
    • Although output quality is good across the board, text is at the low end of the range where the majority of color lasers fall.

Xerox Phaser 6500/DN Specs

Color or Monochrome 1-pass color
Connection Type Ethernet
Connection Type USB
Cost Per Page (Color) 17.5 cents
Maximum Standard Paper Size Legal
Monthly Duty Cycle (Maximum) 40,000 pages per month
Number of Ink Colors 4
Print Duplexing
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Color) 24 ppm
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Mono) 24 ppm
Type Printer Only

Theoretically identical to the Xerox Phaser 6500/N, but with a print duplexer (for two-sided printing) added and with a faster speed on our tests, the Xerox Phaser 6500/DN color laser printer ($499) delivers an impressive balance of speed, output quality, and paper handling, making it a potentially excellent fit in a micro office, small office, or workgroup, and an easy Editors' Choice for color laser printers.

As with the 6500/N, an obvious point of comparison for the 6500/DN($385.07 at Amazon) is the directly competitive Dell 2150cdn, which it replaces as Editors' Choice. The three printers are similar in many ways, with all three built around the same engine and all three rated at 24 pages per minute (ppm) for both monochrome and color output. But where the Xerox 6500/N lacks the duplexer the Dell 2150cdn offers, the 6500/DN adds the duplexer and delivers faster speed as well.

The printer's paper handling is easily enough for most micro or small offices or workgroups, with a 250-sheet tray, a one-sheet manual feed, and a duplexer standard. For heavier-duty needs, you can also add a second 250-sheet tray ($199), making the 6500/DN a good choice for moderate- to heavy-duty printing by small-office standards.

Setup and Speed

As is typical for the breed, the 6500/DN is too big to share a desk with comfortably, at 16.4 by 15.9 by 16.8 inches (HWD). It's also heavy enough, at 40 pounds, so you'll likely want some help moving it. Once in place, however, setup is standard fare. For my tests, I connected it to a wired network, and installed the driver on a system running Windows Vista. Note too that if you prefer to connect wirelessly you can add an external Wi-Fi option ($219).

The printer's speed is both a key strong point and a pleasant surprise. Like many duplex printers, the 6500/DN's driver installs to print in duplex by default, so the official speed for our tests is for two-sided printing. On our business applications suite (using QualityLogic's hardware and software for timing) I clocked it at 5.4 ppm.

Xerox Phaser 6500/DN

That makes the 6500/DN essentially tied with the Dell 2150cdn, at 5.5 ppm. However, the Dell printer's speed is for printing in simplex (one-sided) mode. When I set the 6500/DN to simplex, it came in significantly faster, at 6.5 ppm. Somewhat surprisingly, the 6500/DN in simplex mode was also significantly faster than the Xerox 6500/N, at 5.2 ppm. The difference was entirely due to the 6500/DN printing a PowerPoint file faster, which suggests it offers faster, more efficient processing for that file format.

Output Quality

The 6500/DN's output quality isn't as impressive as its speed, but it's easily good enough for almost any work need. Text in my tests was at the low end of the range where the majority of color lasers fall, but even then, it's high enough quality for almost any business use. Depending on how critical an eye you have, you may consider it suitable for moderately serious desktop publishing. Graphics quality was on par for a color laser, making it suitable for anything up to, and including, PowerPoint handouts. Most people would consider it good enough for marketing materials like one-page handouts or trifold brochures.

Photo quality on plain paper was at the high end of a tight range where most color lasers fall. If you mounted the color photos in our tests in a frame behind glass, they could pass for true photo quality.

Note that the Dell 2150cdn offers somewhat higher output quality, particularly for text, and it may still be your preferred printer if your primary need is absolutely top-tier quality. Alternatively, if you can do without a duplexer, the Xerox 6500/N will give you very similar capability to the 6550/DN. As already discussed, however, it was slower than the 6500/DN in our tests. And for most offices today, the lack of a duplexer can be a significant liability, which is why the 6500/DN earns a higher rating.

All told, the Xerox Phaser 6500/DN's balance of speed, output quality, paper handling, and price makes a compelling argument for the printer, and the combination is enough to make this color laser printer an Editors' Choice.

Best Printer Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Xerox Phaser 6500/DN - Laser Printers

Xerox Phaser 6500/DN Review

4.0 Excellent

The Xerox Phaser 6500/DN color laser printer offers a highly attractive balance of speed, output quality, and paper handling for a small office or workgroup.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio