PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM - Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM is the least expensive lens of its type, but its performance is not up to snuff.
Best Deal£587.58

Buy It Now

£587.58

Pros & Cons

    • Inexpensive.
    • Compact.
    • Fixed f/2.8 aperture.
    • Sharp when stopped down.
    • Disappointing resolution at f/2.8.
    • Some distortion.

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM Specs

Type Lens

On paper, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM ($899 direct)($899.00 at Amazon) is an appealing alternative to similar full-frame zoom lenses. Available for Sigma, Sony, Pentax, Canon, and Nikon cameras, it's roughly half the price of the Canon, Nikon, and Sony takes on the same design. Unfortunately it's not as sharp as comparable lenses when shot at f/2.8, although it is a solid performer at f/4. If you're not looking for stellar performance at maximum aperture it's worth considering, but if you're an event shooter and outstanding performance at f/2.8 is a requirement, you'll want to take a pass on this zoom.

The lens is fairly squat, measuring 3.7 by 3.5 inches (HD), but it's a bit heavy for its size at 1.7 pounds. Compare this to the elongated design of the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED, which measures 5.2 by 3.3 inches and weighs just under 2 pounds. The Sigma lens has a front element that accepts 82mm filters, there's no rotation, so using a polarizing filter is an option. It can focus as close as 15 inches and ships with a carrying case an a lens hood. There's no optical stabilization, but this is also true of the Nikon and Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zooms. Sony and Pentax provide in-body stabilization, so you'll benefit from that system regardless of which lens you use.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the lens when paired with the 36-megapixel Nikon D800. At 24mm f/2.8 the lens is impressively sharp in the center, it exceeds the 1,800 lines per picture height we require for a sharp photo. Its center-weighted score is 2,346 lines, but its edges are a disappointment, the mean score is a downright fuzzy 745 lines, and there's significant purple and green color fringing at the edges of the frame. Stopping down to f/4 goes a long way to improve image quality at 24mm. It increases the overall sharpness to 3,050 lines, and edge performance is much better. Regardless of aperture, distortion is noticeable, but it's not a huge issue at 24mm. The lens shows 1.4 percent barrel distortion, which will make straight lines appear to curve outward. This can be corrected with ease in software like Adobe Photoshop Lightroom.

Image quality drops as you zoom in. At 50mm f/2.8 the lens only manages 1,432 lines. It's another story entirely at f/4; the score improves to 2,690 lines there and edges are sharp. There's 1.3 percent pincushion distortion, which makes lines curve in rather than out, but that's also manageable via Lightroom and won't be evident to the eye in a lot of shots. At 70mm the lens is soft again at f/2.8, scoring only 1,495 lines. Narrowing the aperture to f/4 improves the score to 2,599 lines. There's a little more pincushion distortion, about 1.7 percent. The Sony Carl Zeiss 24-70mm f/2.8($649.99 at Amazon) shows similar distortion characteristics and also loses some resolution as it zooms, but it manages to keep its score above 1,800 lines at f/2.8 throughout its zoom range.

If you're in the market for a fast zoom lens for your full-frame SLR, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM is likely on your radar. It's priced aggressively when you compare it with the $2,000 lenses that Canon, Nikon, and Sony have released to cover the same range. If you stop down to f/4 you'll find the lens to be quite sharp and a good performer. But it doesn't offer that same performance at f/2.8. If you're an event shooter and need the lens to deliver sharp photos in all kinds of light, skip this one. But if you're willing to accept the softness at f/2.8 and use the lens at f/4 and smaller apertures, you can save a good deal of money.

Best Camera Picks

Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM - Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM Review

3.0 Average

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM is the least expensive lens of its type, but its performance is not up to snuff.

Get It Now
Best Deal£587.58

Buy It Now

£587.58

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio