PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 - Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The 10.7x Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 for Micro Four Thirds cameras delivers impressive image quality for a superzoom lens.
Best Deal£565.51

Buy It Now

£565.51

Pros & Cons

    • Reasonable price tag.
    • 10.7x zoom range.
    • Compact design.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Modest aperture.
    • Soft edges at longer focal lengths.
    • No image stabilization.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 Specs

Type Lens

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 ($599.99 direct)($299.99 at Amazon) is an all-in-one zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras. Its 10.7x zoom range covers an impressive 28-300mm (35mm equivalent) field of view, and its aperture only narrows by one f-stop as you zoom. Many lenses of this type are plagued by distortion and sharpness issues, but this one manages to keep distortion to a reasonable level, and aside from some issues with the edges at longer focal lengths, is impressively sharp. It's not a lens for low-light shooting, but if you're looking for a walkaround lens to use in good light, it's a solid option.

The lens measures 3.3 by 2.5 inches, weighs 9.9 ounces, and features a 58mm filter thread. It telescopes as you zoom, doubling in length by the time you get to 150mm, but the front element doesn't rotate so using a polarizing filter is possible. Aside from the wide zoom ring and narrower manual focus ring, there are no physical controls on the barrel. There's also no image stabilization, which isn't an issue for Olympus shooters as its Micro Four Thirds lineup includes that feature in the camera itself. But if you use a Panasonic camera, you'll want to go with a stabilized lens.

I used Imatest to see how well the lens performed when paired with the Olympus OM-D E-M1($799.95 at Amazon). The results were impressive, when you factor in the ambitious zoom range. At 14mm f/4 the lens bettered the 1,800 lines per picture height we require for an image to be called sharp. It manages 2,400 lines using a center-weighted test, and the extreme edges of the frame are just a hair soft at 1,627 lines. Barrel distortion here is the worst you'll see, but it's only 2.2 percent. That's noticeable, but it's not as bad as we've seen from other zooms, and it's fairly easy to correct in software if you'd like to remove the slight curve from your photos.

Zooming to 25mm narrows the maximum aperture to f/4.5, but the lens is plenty sharp wide open. It notches 2,466 lines using our center-weighted test, with edges that top 2,100 lines. At 45mm the aperture narrows to f/5.4, and the edge performance drops off just a bit. It manages 2,308 lines across the frame, with edges that hover around 1,625 lines. This is the first tested focal length where we saw an improvement in sharpness by narrowing the aperture. At 45mm f/8 the lens tops 2,500 lines, with edges that record 2,150 lines.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 : Sample Image

Edge performance becomes an issue by the time you hit 70mm f/5.4. The average sharpness score is still good at 1,985 lines, but the very edges of the frame only manage 856 lines. Stopping down to f/8 offers only marginal improvement. That trend continues at 90mm f/5.5—the lens manages 1,884 lines, but the edges are only about half as sharp.

Things get a little better at 150mm. We see an average score of 1,893 lines across the frame, with edges that are noticeably soft—1,224 lines. Stopping down to f/8 is a good idea here. That improves the average score to 2,087 lines, with edges that score 1,425 lines. Distortion isn't an issue once you zoom, it's less than 0.5 percent from 25mm all the way through 150mm.

Zoom lenses that are as ambitious as the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 often show compromises in image quality. It's the trade-off you make for the convenience of not having to change lenses. This one does an impressive job of minimizing those compromises. Edge sharpness is an issue at longer focal lengths, but distortion is kept to a minimum and the aperture only narrows by one stop from its widest angle to its telephoto extreme. The f/4-5.6 design isn't the best for low-light shooting, but if you're in the market for a zoom for travel, outdoor adventures, or other activities where you don't want to keep changing lenses, this is a good one.

Best Camera Picks

Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 - Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 Review

4.0 Excellent

The 10.7x Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 for Micro Four Thirds cameras delivers impressive image quality for a superzoom lens.

Get It Now
Best Deal£565.51

Buy It Now

£565.51

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio