PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

How We Test Printers

Our lab tests measure overall performance, functionality, and output quality to help you pick the right printer for your needs.

 & Tony Hoffman Senior Writer, Hardware
 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

Printers come in all sorts of varieties—all-in-ones! label printers! wide-format art printers!—and with a dizzying array of potential features. They can be focused primarily on printing text, graphics, or photos, or they might handle all three types of output reasonably well. They can be limited to letter- and legal-size paper, or any larger (or smaller) size you like. And a printer might "only" print, or be a multifunction printer (MFP), also called an all-in-one (AIO), that also scans and copies.

And that's just the basics. Other features can include sending and receiving emails or faxing via phone lines or through the cloud. Printing from cameras is another distinction, as is printing from and scanning to memory cards, USB keys, phones, and tablets. (How about even printing on old-school optical discs?)

Our testing takes all of these variations, and more, into account to cover every aspect of printer functionality, print quality, speed, and hardware and software usability.


Our Suite of Tests

To thoroughly test every aspect of printing, we use two core sets of documents for every printer that can print them, plus additional sets for some specific types of printers. For example, for near-dedicated photo printers that can print at 17 inches, 19 inches, or even wider widths, we add appropriately sized photos, up to the maximum size the printer can handle and that the vendor has supplied paper for.

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

At the other extreme, dedicated label printers can't print letter-size documents, so we use files consisting of nothing but address labels to test the ones that print paper labels, or a standard text phrase to test the ones that print label strips, typically on plastic media.

All tests are run using one of several printer testbed Windows systems, all of which have identical hardware and software. To ensure that the software environment is identical, we restore the disk image for each testbed from a master image as the first step in our tests before installing each printer.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

The results provide a firm basis for comparison between printers as appropriate. Even though we can't print a letter-size business document on a dedicated 4-by-6-inch photo printer, for example, we can print 4-by-6-inch photos on almost any printer, which lets us compare speeds and quality over the entire range from small-format photo printer to desktop inkjet, laser, and professional-level wide-carriage photo printer.

Our business suite of test documents includes documents created in and printed from Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Some have only text or only business graphics. Others mix text with embedded charts and photos. All output is on the same brand and type of 20-pound-weight plain paper for all printers, and all images are printed in default mode in simplex (one-sided). For printers with auto duplexing (two-sided printing), we also print the Word file in duplex.

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

Our photo suite includes 300dpi-resolution photographs in two sizes: 4 by 6 inches and 8.5 by 11 inches. We use nine color photos and one 8.5-by-11-inch monochrome photo. The color images are chosen to include skin tones, a wide range of shading from dark to light in a single image, and "memory colors." (The latter are real-world colors that people tend to remember and know what they should look like, such as grass green, sky blue, and flesh tones.)

For photo printing, we use the paper the vendor recommends; if there is no vendor recommendation, we use the same high-quality 24-pound color copier paper for all lasers or the same generic photo paper for all inkjets. For all photos in the photo suite, we use the highest quality available without custom or advanced settings.

For additional quality tests for near-dedicated, professional-level photo printers, we typically use assorted fine art papers, as provided by the vendors, to show off the printers to their best advantage. For small-format printers with a maximum 5-by-7-inch image size, we use a modified set of our photo suite that includes the 4-by-6-inch photos from the standard photo suite, and resized versions of the 8.5-by-11-inch photos. Smaller photo printers (for 2-by-3-inch photos, for example) are typically designed to print as phone companions, which means they can't print from our Windows testbeds to run our standard tests. In those cases, we run ad hoc tests appropriate for the individual printer and report how we tested them. 


Printer Speed Testing

To measure performance, we time each file in the full business applications suite and each of the 4-by-6-inch photos in the photo suite. Because print times and quality can vary from one print run to the next, we print each file multiple times, then average the results. The exact number of times depends on how much variability we see in the first few runs of the test.

For simplex printing, we report the times for the Word text document alone and for the entire business applications suite. For the Word document, we report the time for the first page only (as a first page out, or FPO, time), which is most relevant for short text documents. We also report the speed in seconds and in pages per minute (ppm) for both the entire document and for the document without the first page, which is the most relevant speed for longer documents than we include in our tests.

Because this is a text document, it needs little to no processing time, which means the results reflect the fastest speeds you can expect to see from the printer. Documents with graphics, photos, or even text with significant formatting are likely to take longer.

(Credit; Joseph Maldonado)

For the full business applications suite, we report the speed in both time and ppm for the entire suite, including the Word file. The difference in ppm speeds for the entire suite as compared with the speed for the Word file alone comes partly from the FPO times added to each file, and partly from the extra processing time needed for the graphics and photos in the other files of the suite.

Some printers lose a much higher percentage of their speed in ppm compared with others when printing in duplex as opposed to printing the same file in simplex. That makes the duplex print speed the more important factor if most of your printing is two-sided. For duplex printing of the Word file, we report the time for the first sheet (pages 1 and 2), and the speed in time and in pages per minute (ppm) for both the rest of the document without the first page, and for the entire document.

We also report the average time in seconds for printing a 4-by-6-inch photo.


Printer Output Quality Testing

For testing output quality, we use both the files that we time and additional output we print specifically for testing quality. Because how well a printer does on any one type of document isn't necessarily indicative of how well it will do on the others, we report print quality separately for text, graphics, and photos. We evaluate quality based primarily on specific issues in each image that we know, from experience, are likely problem areas for printers. We use carefully selected criteria for each individual issue, and a clearly defined scale for each measure.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

For text quality, we look at the output for several fonts, in sizes ranging from 4 to 72 points, in the printer's default mode on plain paper. We pay special attention to how well-formed the characters are at each font size and how sharp the characters' edges are. We also consider how well the printer maintains the separation between characters, how well it holds the loops in characters like lowercase Es and Gs, and whether the text is a suitably dark black rather than gray. Many of these issues require magnification to see the actual problem at small font sizes, but they make the difference between a 4- or 6-point font being easily readable or not.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

For graphics quality, we analyze the Microsoft Excel charts and Microsoft PowerPoint slides from the business applications suite. We look for color saturation, consistency of fills, posterization (lack of smoothness in gradients), banding, misregistration, ability to hold thin lines, and dithering. In addition, if we see any issues that we don't normally look for, we factor those in and report them.

(Credit: M. David Stone)

For photo quality, we focus our analysis on the accuracy of image reproduction on photo paper for printers that use photo paper, or on the high-quality color copier paper we use with most laser printers for our photo suite. We also consider the photos included in our business applications suite, which are printed in the printer's default mode on plain paper.


Functionality and User Experience Testing

For functionality testing, we judge ease of hardware setup, software installation, and network setup. We also look at how easy it is to use features such as front-panel menus, driver settings, and both printing from and scanning to USB memory keys, websites, and mobile devices.

For paper handling, we note input capacity, number of paper trays, and limits on paper sizes, and for printers that offer only manual duplex for printing, we test that feature as well. Where printers have additional paper-handling capabilities such as stackers, sorters, and finishers with a stapler and hole-punch features, we test those features, too.

(Credit; Joseph Maldonado)

Additional tests for all-in-one printers (AIOs) necessarily vary by model, depending on the functions the individual printer offers. For AIOs that offer scanning, copying, and faxing, we test all three functions, including using both the flatbed and the automatic document feeder (ADF) if there is one. For ADFs that duplex, we test the duplex feature, too. (For more on this, see how we test scanners.)

More generally, we confirm that each function works and is appropriate for the target user. For a mono laser AIO meant for an office, for example, we confirm that the output quality is suitable for office use, which means that the copy and scan features handle text well; how well it handles graphics and photos is less important. For an inkjet AIO designed for a photo enthusiast or a scrapbooker, however, scanning and copying color photos and graphics are key issues, while features like software for OCRing text aren't.

Finally, with both single-function and multifunction printers, we test any unusual features—such as using a QR code on a front-panel LCD to establish a mobile connection—to make sure they work as promised and are actually useful.

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

Our consistent use of the same testing protocol for every printer allows us to make accurate and useful comparisons between models, so you know exactly how they measure up. No matter what you need a printer for, we'll help you find one that's exactly right.

About Our Experts

Tony Hoffman

Tony Hoffman

Senior Writer, Hardware

Since 2004, I have worked on PCMag’s hardware team, covering at various times printers, scanners, projectors, storage, and monitors. I currently focus my efforts on 3D printers, pro and productivity displays, and drives and SSDs of all sorts.

Over the years, I have reviewed smart telescopes, iPad and iPhone science apps, plus the occasional camera, laptop, keyboard, and mouse. I've also written a host of articles about astronomy, space science, travel photography, and astrophotography for PCMag and its past and present sibling publications (among them, Mashable and ExtremeTech), as well as for the former PCMag Digital Edition.

The Technology I Use

I have a Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptop that's my work daily driver, an HP Pavilion Aero 13 as my primary personal laptop, and an Asus ProArt P16 for detailed photo work. (I also have an older Dell XPS 13, which now stays at home full-time.) For storage testing, I rely on our three custom-built Windows testbeds in PC Labs, as well as a 2024 MacBook Pro.

My primary home monitor is a BenQ EX2780Q, a gaming monitor with a great sound system and excellent image quality. I use that panel for writing, watching videos, and working with photos. I also have an HP 27 Curved Display—one of the first general-purpose curved monitors—which I have paired with an Acer Aspire desktop computer. My multifunction printer is an Epson Expression Premium XP-7100 Small-in-One. I also own an Epson Perfection V39 flatbed scanner, which I use for photos and short documents, and a Canon Selphy CP1300 small-format photo printer for turning out snapshots.

My first cell phone, in 2006, was a Motorola Razr; since then, it’s been all iPhones—I currently have an iPhone 15 Pro. I use my iPhone a lot for casual photography, though I also use a Sony DSC-RX100 VII and a Canon G5 X Mark II for everyday shooting. For much of my travel photography and astrophotography, I use either a Sony A7r II or A7 III, paired with a variety of lenses ranging from a Sony 14mm f/1.8 prime to a Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS zoom lens. I also pair the A7r with a RedCat 51 for deep-sky star shooting. For astrophotography, I also use the Seestar S30 and S50 and the Unistellar Odyssey smart telescopes, which are essentially astronomical cameras controlled through one’s mobile device.

Read full bio

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio