PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM - Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM lens snaps shots with a razor-thin depth of focus and is ideal for use in extremely dim light, but we think it's worth getting the premium DS variation instead.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Extra-bright f/1.2 optics
    • Excellent resolution
    • Dust, splash, and fluorine protection
    • Reliable autofocus
    • Customizable control ring
    • Background blur not as pleasing as DS edition
    • Hefty
    • Visible focus breathing

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM Specs

Dimensions 4.6 by 4.1 inches
Filter Thread 82
Focal Length (Wide) 85
Focus Type Autofocus
Mount Canon RF
Optical Stabilization None
Weight 2.6

Canon sells two editions of its RF 85mm F1.2 L USM lens. We reviewed the premium RF 85mm F1.2 L USM DS ($2,999) last year, and are following up with a look at the standard edition, priced at $2,699. It omits the Defocus Smoothing filter, an optical element that changes the way background blur shows in images and reduces light transmission. Photographers who work in challenging light may prefer the RF 85mm F1.2 L USM, and it's nearly as fantastic a performer as its twin. We give preference to the rendering of the DS version, our Editors' Choice winner.

F1.2 Optics

The RF 85mm F1.2 L USM is fairly squat, coming in at 4.6 by 4.1 inches (HD). It's hefty too, at 2.6 pounds, with a big front glass element that takes 82mm front filters. That's the cost of a lens that gathers as much light as this one does. If you want a lighter prime for portraits, the RF 85mm F2 Macro weighs just 17.6 ounces and can be had for around $600.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

The low-cost 85mm F2 isn't an L series lens, though, so it's not built to the same standards. The 85mm F1.2 includes dust and splash protection and its front element is protected with anti-smudge fluorine, all absent from the 85mm F2.

On-lens controls are pretty basic. The 85mm F1.2 includes an AF/MF toggle switch, a manual focus ring, and a programmable control ring. The latter clicks as it turns—if you prefer silent operation, you can have Canon adjust it for a $79.99 fee.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

An autofocus limiter switch is included, too. You can set the lens to look for subjects at any distance or limit focus to subjects about five feet (1.5m) from the camera and farther. It's useful as the autofocus system isn't instant; it takes about a second to move drive across the focal range.

Manual focus works well. The focus ring turns comfortably, with just enough resistance to make fine adjustments practical. There is some visible breathing, a change in angle that shifts along with focus. It's something to think about if you're using the lens for video; it's not a good fit for shots that track a subject moving to or from camera, or for focus racks.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM : Sample Image
EOS R5, f/1.2, 1/640-second, ISO 100

Focus is available as near as 2.8 feet (85cm). It doesn't put the the lens into macro territory; the 85mm F2 is a better fit there. At the nearest focus distance it projects objects at 1:8.3 life-size, and when coupled with the wide aperture photos show an incredibly shallow depth of field.

In the Lab

I paired the RF 85mm F1.2 with the 45MP EOS R5 for testing. The pair delivers resolution that's very good for the R5's sensor at its widest apertures (3,800 lines), nets excellent results by f/2 (4,250 lines), and is outstanding by f/4 (4,900 lines). We did note some chromatic aberration—purple color fringing—in shots at f/1.2, an effect the DS version of the lens avoids.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM : Sample Image
EOS R5, f/1.2, 1/500-second, ISO 100

See How We Test Cameras and LensesSee How We Test Cameras and Lenses

Details hold up to the edges, though depth of field will blur them away at wider apertures. There's no distortion visible in shots, and while you'll see a vignette when working in Raw format, your camera's JPG engine and Raw processors like Adobe Lightroom compensate for it automatically.

The difference between this edition of the RF 85mm and the DS edition is in the background blur—the bokeh. This standard version draws defocused highlights like most other lenses, with a slight cat's eye effect toward edges and corners when used at f/1.2 or f/1.4, and circular highlights across the frame at smaller f-stops.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM : Bokeh Comparison
The bokeh drawn by the DS edition (left) is generally softer and more diffused when compared with the standard version (right)

Generally speaking, the DS edition shows background that's a bit softer, with less definition. It comes at a cost—the lens is $300 more and it gathers less, with the light transmission (t-stop) closer to f/2 wide open. The DS shows a bit more contrast at its widest apertures too, resulting in higher resolution scores in our lab tests.

For Low-Light Mavens

Portrait specialists working with the Canon EOS R system have a pair of fantastic lenses to choose between in this focal length. Get the RF 85mm F1.2 L USM if you work in really dim light. If naturally lit, interior portraits or astrophotography is your bailiwick, you'll be drawn to this one.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM : Sample Image
EOS R5, f/1.2, 1/500-second, ISO 100

But for everyone else, the extra $300 for the Defocus Smoothing edition of the lens is money well spent. Its images have a bit more contrast at wide apertures, the background blur is more pleasing, and it still gathers plenty of light, while netting the ultra-thin depth of field look that only an f/1.2 lens can capture.

If the DS lens didn't exist, I'd be more apt to recommend this one. It's still an L series model, with the sublime optics and performance you expect from Canon. It's a notable upgrade from the aging EF 85mm F1.2L II for Canon SLRs for sure.

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

But it competes with the RF 85mm F1.2 L USM DS. That fancier version of the lens costs a bit more, $2,999 instead of $2,699, but it's a worthwhile premium.

Thanks to LensrentalsLensrentals for providing equipment for this review.

Final Thoughts

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM - Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM

3.5 Good

The Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM lens snaps shots with a razor-thin depth of focus and is ideal for use in extremely dim light, but we think it's worth getting the premium DS variation instead.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio