PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E - Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E is one of the smallest lenses for the Sony full-frame system, and has a lot of appeal if you're after a low-cost prime.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Pancake design
    • Quick, accurate autofocus
    • Minimal focus breathing
    • Strong central sharpness
    • Optics disappoint on high-resolution sensors
    • Strong vignette at f/2.8
    • Omits dust and splash protection

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E Specs

Dimensions 1.5 by 2.4 inches
Filter Thread 49
Focal Length (Wide) 24
Focus Type Autofocus
Mount Sony E
Optical Stabilization None
Weight 4.2

The Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E ($399.99) is one of the smallest prime lenses you can get for the system, with a wide angle of view versatile enough for landscapes, environmental portraits, and everyday snapshots alike. Its optics aren't as amazing as premium alternatives, like Sony's $1,400 FE 24mm F1.4 GM, but Rokinon doesn't charge an arm and a leg for its wide prime.

Featherweight Build

The Rokinon 24mm is one of the smallest, lightest primes you can get for your Sony full-frame camera. It's not quite a pancake—the front element extends a little bit past the handgrip of an a7 series camera—but it's close enough at 1.5 by 2.4 inches (HD) and a mere 4.2 ounces. The filter ring supports the 49mm thread size.

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E

You get a small hood with the lens, fabricated from lightweight plastic. It's not in danger of falling apart, but isn't of the same level of quality as sturdier composite materials used by Sony and others. The barrel is also plastic, though it seems to be a step up in quality versus the hood.

Aside from branding and a red accent ring, aesthetics are basic black. We received the lens with Rokinon branding, but it's sold under the Samyang banner in many markets. Prices can vary a bit, so be happy to know you if you're able to find the Samyang 24mm F2.8 Sony AF for less money, you'll get the same lens.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/2.8, 1/2,000-second, ISO 100

There are better made lenses near this price. The Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 is priced similarly, but steps things up with sturdier composite materials and weather sealing—both missing here. There's a trade-off, though—Tamron's lens doesn't focus as quickly or as quietly as the Rokinon.

Rokinon gets autofocus right. I found it to be quick and accurate, as well as quiet, when working with an a7R IV body and its Real Time Tracking focus system. The lens acts just as a Sony one, with full support for face and eye detection, and breathing is minimal—a benefit for videographers.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/2.8, 1/1,250-second, ISO 100

There's no optical stabilization, but Sony's in-body system does a good job removing the jitters from handheld video, and offers enough compensation to make subject motion more of a concern for handheld imaging than camera shake.

Manual focus is available if you want it. The focus ring is well damped, with pleasing resistance. It gives the electronic focus system a feel that's not far off from an old-fashioned mechanical lens—the resistance makes it easier to dial in small, precise adjustments, and your camera's frame magnification focus aid makes it easy to perfectly find the point of focus.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/2.8, 1/1,250-second, ISO 100

The lens is able to focus as close as 9.5 inches, good enough for 1:7.7 life-size reproduction at its closest. It doesn't focus as close as the Tamron 24mm, which gets as near as 4.7 inches for a much larger 1:2 macro rating, but it's not limiting either. You're typically able to lean in and get closer to your subject when you want to, and you can get plenty of background blur when focusing close.

In the Lab

I tested the 24mm F2.8 along with the Sony a7R IV, a full-frame camera with a 60MP image sensor, and software from Imatest.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/2.8, 1/1,600-second, ISO 100

At f/2.8, the pair puts up resolution that's decidedly disappointing, about 2,700 lines, a soft result for the a7R IV. Details are actually good in the central area of the frame (3,500 lines), but drop off quickly as you look toward the edges.

See How We Test LensesSee How We Test Lenses

It's not a big issue for shots where you want some bokeh, but you'll want to narrow the aperture for best results when shooting landscapes and other shots where edge-to-edge clarity is key.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/5, 1/2-second, ISO 100

Details are noticeably sharper at f/4 (3,440 lines), and cross into excellent territory at f/5.6 (4,025 lines), f/8 (4,295 lines), and f/11 (3,995 lines). Landscape photographers will get the best resolution at the periphery at f/8, about 4,000 lines.

Diffraction sets in at f/16 on the a7R IV and results in a slight drop in clarity. Still, you'll net good results (3,530 lines) at f/16. The lens also captures crisply defined sunstars there. Resolution drops off seriously at f/22 (2,275 lines), and sunstars aren't that much better than you get at f/16.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/16, 1/80-second, ISO 100

Because of its wide open performance, we more strongly recommend the 24mm F2.8 for use with 24MP models, like the a7 III, that ask less of optics. It is a good fit for use with APS-C models, where its angle of view is narrowed, as the area of the image circle covered by the smaller sensor format nets good results wide open and excellent ones from f/4 onward.

There's a bit of pincushion distortion in photos—Imatest measures it at 1.4 percent—a concern if you're using the lens for serious architectural work, but not so much for the rest of us. Adobe Lightroom Classic includes a lens profile to eliminate the effect with a single click.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/22, 1/60-second, ISO 100

The profile also removes a visible vignette from shots. Sony's in-camera corrections lessen it when shooting in JPG format, but you still see some dimness at the corners at f/2.8. Uncorrected Raw images show a strong vignette at f/2.8 and a lesser, but visible one at f/4.

The Right Compromises

As with most offerings that are in some way classified as budget, there are compromises made to sell a full-frame, 24mm lens that's this small and light at a reasonable price. For $400—or less when discounted—you don't get the best optics, or a rugged all-weather build.

Sample Image
Sony a7R IV, f/2.8, 1/1,600-second, ISO 100

Instead, you get a lens that puts an emphasis on size; it barely adds any girth to your camera. Optical performance is good enough wide open on most cameras, and can keep up with the a7R IV when stopped down. Autofocus is quick and quiet too.

Its biggest competition is Tamron's 24mm F2.8. It's priced similarly, and is sharper wide open than the Rokinon is at its best, and adds weather protection. We rate it a bit higher, though a slower, audible focus motor makes it a lesser choice for video.

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E

Photographers with a big budget, or those who don't mind scrimping and saving to get the absolute best, should get the Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM instead. The Rokinon, or Samyang if you prefer, is an affordable alternative for photographers who prioritize size and autofocus speed.

Final Thoughts

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E - Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E

Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E

3.5 Good

The Rokinon 24mm F2.8 AF Sony E is one of the smallest lenses for the Sony full-frame system, and has a lot of appeal if you're after a low-cost prime.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio