PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

The Best Audiophile Headphones for 2026

If you take sound quality seriously, check out the best high-fidelity headphones and earphones we've reviewed.

 & Tim Gideon Contributing Editor, Audio
 & Eric Zeman Managing Editor, Consumer Electronics
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Audiophile. Using the word makes us cringe because it implies an air of exclusivity. In reality, it just means someone who takes high-fidelity audio seriously. You don't have to be a sound snob to enjoy good audio, and if you're looking for quality headphones, what's wrong with understanding what makes them special? PCMag's audio experts have been independently and ethically writing about audiophile-friendly headphones for over 20 years, so you can trust our reviews are both authoritative and insightful. You can't go wrong with any of our Editors' Choice winners, among them the Etymotic ER4 XRs, the HiFiMan Ananda planars, and the Sony MDR-M1 studio monitors. Ultimately, the best headphones for you are the ones you like best, so all of our top picks—both wired and wireless—are worth a look. Make sure to read our in-depth reviews for each model and read to the end for more buying tips.

You Can Trust Our Reviews

Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. Read our editorial mission & see how we test.

Deeper Dive: Our Top Tested Picks

  • Etymotic ER4 XR
    Best for Critical Accuracy

    Etymotic ER4 XR

    5.0 Exemplary

    Pros & Cons

      • Exceptionally accurate mids and highs coupled with rich, full bass response. Detachable, high-quality cable. Plethora of eartip options in various sizes and styles. Ships with several accessories, including zip-up case.
      • No inline remote control or mic.

    Why We Picked It

    Etymotic makes some of the most accurate earbuds, but you might find them somewhat clinical. The ER4 XR earphones stand out because they simply add a tiny bit of low-frequency emphasis over the flatter ER4 SR.

    Who It’s For

    Most music lovers are likely to favor options with a little more richness in the lows and low-mids, but start with these if you need something for critical listening. The deliberate bass boost doesn't make them any less ideal for checking mixes.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type In-Canal
    Get It Now
  • HiFiMan Ananda
    Best Planars for Home Listening

    HiFiMan Ananda

    5.0 Exemplary

    Pros & Cons

      • Phenomenal audio performance with superb sense of space, accurate bass, and lovely detail throughout frequency range. Comfortable over long listening sessions. Ships with two detachable cables.
      • Open design leaks audio. Cables lack inline remote control or mic.

    Why We Picked It

    The Ananda headphones cost $1,000 at launch, so you can view their current retail price as a steal (we're just kidding, they're still very expensive). Their open design and planar magnetic drivers create an authentic soundstage, as well as deliver excellent clarity and dynamics. The frequency range is wide, too: 8Hz to 55KHz. 

    Who It’s For

    These are for at-home listeners who want an amazing over-ear experience and aren’t worried about anyone else hearing the music, as audio definitely leaks out of the open design. The earcups are massive—they contact your jawline—but are still quite comfortable. Of course, the real focus here is a lovely, accurate sound, which is wonderful for everything from mixing modern tracks to enjoying classical recordings.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Get It Now
  • Sony MDR-M1
    Best for Home and Studio Use

    Sony MDR-M1

    4.5 Outstanding

    Pros & Cons

      • Neutral sound for studio work
      • High-resolution support
      • Lightweight and comfortable
      • Removable cables
      • No carrying case or bag

    Why We Picked It

    The nondescript MDR-M1 headphones don't stand out visually, but are exceptionally comfortable. The audio performance is ideal for both pro applications and simply enjoying music at home. The MDR-M1s support high-resolution audio (5Hz to 80kHz) with a mostly neutral frequency response and remarkable clarity. We also appreciate the long, screw-in cable lightweight build

    Who It’s For

    Musicians and engineers who want something that can transition from tracking to checking mixes to listening to music for fun should appreciate the versatility of MDR-M1 headphones. The 40mm drivers produce outstanding audio at any level that's distortion-free and the headphones are comfortable to wear for hours at a time.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Get It Now
    Learn More Sony MDR-M1 Review
  • Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X LE
    Best Midrange Studio Headphones

    Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X LE

    4.5 Outstanding

    Pros & Cons

      • Wonderful low-frequency response
      • Bright, detailed highs
      • Exceptionally comfortable
      • Replaceable earpads and headband cover
      • Detachable cable
      • Light on accessories

    Why We Picked It

    We like the sound signature of the Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X LE headphones because their Stellar.45 dynamic drivers give equal attention to all the frequency ranges. These monitors are also supremely comfortable and easy to drive across a variety of sound sources. The sustainable design is yet another highlight; the cable, earpads, and headband cover are all user-replaceable.

    Who It’s For

    These headphones are as close to ideal for studio work as you can get for under $200. They present potent sub-bass, lovely mids, and exceptionally clear highs. Those same qualities make them quite enjoyable for home listening, too. And they should last quite a while thanks to their easy-to-repair design.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 1/4-inch
    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Get It Now
  • Grado SR325x
    Best Midrange Open-Back Headphones

    Grado SR325x

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Wonderfully wide stereo image
      • Rich bass response, accurate mids, and detailed highs
      • Iconic design
      • Hardwired cable
      • Few accessories
      • Leaks audio (by design)

    Why We Picked It

    Some Grado headphones cost well over $1,000, but you don't need to spend that much to experience their characteristic spatial presentation. The midrange SR325x headphones capture much of that special sound thanks to their open-back design, wide soundstage, and exceptional blend of low-frequency richness and high-frequency detail. They also look the part with a retro design and a braided (albeit non-removable) cable. Just keep in mind that their loose on-ear fit might require a bit of an adjustment.

    Who's It For

    If you want to experience the Grado sound, its SR325x headphones are an ideal entry into the company's lineup. They aren't prohibitively expensive but still produce the high-end audio we expect. Fashion-focused buyers will also likely appreciate their aesthetic.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Supra-aural (on-ear)
    Get It Now
    Learn More Grado SR325x Review
  • Shure Aonic 215 (Gen 2)
    Best Wired and Wireless Combined Earbuds

    Shure Aonic 215 (Gen 2)

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Accurate audio performance with rich lows and clear highs Class-leading EQ Customizable controls Water-resistant design
      • Expensive Bulky build and case

    Why We Picked It

    The Aonic 215 (Gen 2) earphones are unique in that they support both wired and wireless listening. You must pay extra for a cable that enables that functionality, but the flexibility it affords is more than worth the cost, especially if you want to listen to lossless audio (which Bluetooth can't handle).

    Who It’s For

    Anyone who wants a little more control over how they hear their music should appreciate what these earbuds offer. It's not just the versatility of wired and wireless audio—their companion app has the best EQ we've seen yet with accurate graphics that show the changes you make.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Bluetooth
    True Wireless
    Type In-Canal
    Water/Sweat-Resistant
    Wireless
    Get It Now
  • HiFiMan Sundara
    Best Affordable Planar Magnetic Headphones

    HiFiMan Sundara

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Excellent clarity throughout the frequency range
      • Planar magnetic drivers
      • Detachable cable
      • Just slightly extended bass depth
      • Less spacious sound than some competitors
      • Leaks audio (by design)

    Why We Picked It

    Planar magnetic models are usually quite pricey, so the HiFiMan Sundara headphones are a comparative value. Like the more expensive planar models we’ve tested, they deliver a nearly transparent sound signature and can easily reach down to cover any lows in the mix. This open-back pair covers an impressive frequency range of 6Hz to 75kHz at an impedance of 32 ohms. Conveniently, they use a replaceable wire.

    Who It’s For

    Although sound engineers could certainly use the Sundara headphones to check mixes, home listening is likely the more common use case because their open design leaks sound. But no matter how you use them, you get fantastic clarity throughout the frequency range for a (relatively) low price.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Get It Now
  • Sennheiser HD 660S2
    Best Sennheiser Headphones

    Sennheiser HD 660S2

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Balanced and rich sound signature
      • Open, circumaural design results in a wide spatial feel
      • Removable cables
      • Pricey
      • Included cables could be longer

    Why We Picked It

    The open-back Sennheiser HD 660S2 headphones offer a spacious, neutral audio signature for home listening. Their perforated metallic grilles and semi-transparent cloth covers allow you to see the front and back of the internal 38mm dynamic drivers, and the rest of the design is similarly sophisticated. Thanks to XLR-4 connections on each earcup, you can switch between the two included cables as you like (they respectively terminate in quarter-inch and 4.4mm connections). Otherwise, the box includes a drawstring pouch and a 3.5mm headphone jack adapter.

    Who It’s For

    If you have a system powerful enough to drive them (they have an impedance of 300 ohms), the Sennheiser HD 660S2 headphones provide a premium, articulate audio experience. They are pricey, but their ability to reproduce the deepest sub-bass and push transparent highs makes them worth the splurge.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 1/4-inch
    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Get It Now
  • Sennheiser IE 200
    Best Midrange In-Ear Monitors

    Sennheiser IE 200

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Accurate, balanced sound
      • Attractive design with detachable, braided cable
      • Relatively affordable
      • No inline controls or mic
      • First-party replacement cables are pricey

    Why We Picked It

    Sennheiser's IE 200 in-ear monitors (IEMs) are an affordable introduction to the world of high-end audio because they prioritize accuracy throughout the entire frequency range. Each enclosure houses a 7mm dynamic driver that delivers a frequency range of 6Hz to 20kHz at an impedance of 18 ohms. Meanwhile, a detachable wire and standard MMCX connectors ensure their longevity.

    Who It’s For

    These IEMs produce a nuanced, near-flat sound signature so they are ideal for listeners who value a transparent presentation of music. They also come with foam tips, which help improve their fit and passive noise isolation.

    Specs & Configurations

    Connection Type Stereo 3.5mm
    Type In-Canal
    Get It Now
  • Shure Aonic 50 Gen 2
    Best for Wireless High-Res Codec Support

    Shure Aonic 50 Gen 2

    4.0 Excellent

    Pros & Cons

      • Accurate sound with rich lows and detailed highs
      • Excellent Bluetooth codec support
      • Optional wired playback
      • Top-notch EQ
      • Better battery life than predecessors
      • Noise cancellation is merely decent
      • Convoluted controls

    Why We Picked It

    The Shure Aonic 50 Gen 2 headphones sound transparent and support practically every high-end Bluetooth codec you could want for wireless audio, including AAC, AptX Adaptive, AptX HD, and LDAC. And when you want to listen via a wired connection, the included USB-C cable enables high-res playback at up to 32-bit/384kHz. They also work with an app that has a superb parametric EQ, can last up to 45 hours per charge, and include a hard-shell zip-up case.

    Who It’s For

    If you want the option for high-quality wired playback without giving up the convenience of high-quality wireless audio, these are a great choice. Their active noise cancellation is merely average, but that's better than not having it at all.

    Specs & Configurations

    Active Noise Cancellation
    Connection Type Bluetooth
    Connection Type Stereo 2.5mm
    Connection Type USB-C
    Type Circumaural (over-ear)
    Wireless
    Get It Now
The Best Audiophile Headphones for 2026

Compare Specs

Select Up To 3Select Up To 2
Our Pick
Rating
5.0 Exemplary
5.0 Exemplary
4.5 Outstanding
4.5 Outstanding
4.0 Excellent
4.0 Excellent
4.0 Excellent
4.0 Excellent
4.0 Excellent
4.0 Excellent
5.0 Exemplary
5.0 Exemplary
4.5 Outstanding
Best For
Best for Critical Accuracy
Best Planars for Home Listening
Best for Home and Studio Use
Best Midrange Studio Headphones
Best Midrange Open-Back Headphones
Best Wired and Wireless Combined Earbuds
Best Affordable Planar Magnetic Headphones
Best Sennheiser Headphones
Best Midrange In-Ear Monitors
Best for Wireless High-Res Codec Support
Best for Critical Accuracy
Best Planars for Home Listening
Best for Home and Studio Use
Type
In-CanalCircumaural (over-ear)Circumaural (over-ear)Circumaural (over-ear)Supra-aural (on-ear)In-CanalCircumaural (over-ear)Circumaural (over-ear)In-CanalCircumaural (over-ear)In-CanalCircumaural (over-ear)Circumaural (over-ear)
Wireless
True Wireless
Connection Type
Stereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mmStereo 1/4-inch, Stereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mmBluetoothStereo 3.5mmStereo 1/4-inch, Stereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mmBluetooth, USB-C, Stereo 2.5mmStereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mmStereo 3.5mm
Water/Sweat-Resistant
Active Noise Cancellation

Buying Guide: The Best Audiophile Headphones for 2026


What Are Audiophile Headphones?

Many people associate audiophile-level sound quality with a flat response. Headphones with this sound signature don't dramatically boost or cut various sub-ranges within the frequency range. This isn't a negative quality; a flat response means accuracy, which is what most audiophiles want.

Of course, the term is quixotic—if it were actually possible to achieve a perfectly flat response, all the competing headphones and earphones that claim to provide this quality wouldn't sound so different from each other. Think of flat response as the ideal from which nearly every pair of headphones deviates.

To some, a truly flat response sounds clinical. And then there's the modern dilemma that some mix engineers face: Do you mix for flat response-style speakers or for speakers that have more bass depth (which are much more common among consumers)? Engineers have traditionally used high-quality flat-response monitors for the bulk of their work and then checked their mixes on more affordable speakers and headphones. But in recent years, the affordable stuff has become increasingly more powerful and capable of producing tremendous bass depth.

Sennheiser IE 200
(Credit: Tim Gideon)

If I could point out one trend in headphones in the last decade or so, it would be the rise of bass response—many high-fidelity, expensive headphones, including the Etymotic ER-series earbuds, are available with slightly boosted bass. Several modern music genres also utilize digital (and some analog) instruments that push bass to depths that were previously less common, now that more speakers and headphones can reproduce them.

It's something to keep in mind and be honest with yourself about. Do you really want a flat response, or would you like something close to it, but with a little more bass depth? You have several options these days, and those who thumb their noses at you if you choose to enjoy a little more bass depth are neither right nor wrong. Especially with audiophile-level gear, the right choice depends on your preference.


What Headphones Do Professionals Use?

The words "pro" or "professional" appear in the names of plenty of headphones and some earphones we review. The term is somewhat misleading—headphones for studio musicians or mix engineers don't need to be exclusive to those professionals. If you're looking for the most accurate sound signature you can afford, pro-level models are often your best bet.

There's a wide range of pro-level headphones to consider. Typical tracking headphones that musicians wear in the recording studio are usually affordable, though the reference models engineers use to check their mixes can cost quite a bit more.

Most of these models use cables without an inline remote control or microphone. It's sometimes possible, depending on the model, to replace the cable with one that has an inline remote, but it might not be worth it because most phones don't have a headphone jack any longer. That trend (and the fact that Bluetooth isn't yet lossless) has created a bit of a gap in the market because it makes top-end wired models really only viable for people with pro and stereo gear (or computers and tablets that still have headphone jacks).


Audiophile Earphones vs. Headphones

In the headphone realm, you have several styles to consider—circumaural (over-ears) or supra-aural (on-ears) for how they fit over or on your ears, and open-back (project audio outward from the enclosure to create a more natural spatial sound), semi-open, or closed (typically leak far less audio) for the earcup design.

For earphones, don't buy the flat-style models that sit against your ear and don't seal off the canal. They don't fit consistently and thus aren't likely to sound good. Canal-sealing in-ears, however, can provide top-notch audio with exceptional detail and superb bass depth.

No style is superior to another, so it's worth considering them all.


What Are the Types of Headphone Drivers?

Different styles of drivers provide unique experiences. You are certain to hear arguments that one type is better than another, but none is empirically better overall, just different. Dynamic drivers are the most common for over-ear models, though in-ear pairs also often rely on balanced armatures.

HiFiMan Sundara
(Credit: Tim Gideon)

The planar magnetic driver revolution is in full effect: These lightweight, fast-response drivers produce superb levels of detail. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) tech is starting to arrive in consumer products, too, which promises an especially precise response and more consistent driver-to-driver builds.

Ultimately, if headphones sound amazing, the technology they use to get there is a somewhat secondary concern, assuming they don't drastically degrade the signal somehow.


Are Audiophile Headphones Worth It?

It's no secret that audiophile-quality headphones can cost more than regular ones, so you should make sure you're getting a pair worth your hard-earned cash. Yes, we know you like buying everything online now. But if you can visit a brick-and-mortar store that sells headphones and allows you to try them out in-store, it’s an invaluable experience. These physical retail spots are increasingly less common, however, so we do our best to cover the appearance and fit of every model we review.

If you need a little more flexibility in terms of price or gym-friendliness, check out our lists of the best headphones overall and the best workout earphones.

Once you find the perfect pair, head over to our guides on five easy tips to extend the life of your headphones and eight ways you're using them wrong.

About Our Experts

Tim Gideon

Tim Gideon

Contributing Editor, Audio

My Experience

I've been a contributing editor for PCMag since 2011. Before that, I was PCMag's lead audio analyst from 2006 to 2011. Even though I'm a freelancer now, PCMag has been my home for well over a decade, and audio gear reviews are still my primary focus. Prior to my career in reviewing tech, I worked as an audio engineer—my love of recording audio eventually led me to writing about audio gear.

My Areas of Expertise

  • Headphones and earphones
  • Wireless and computer speakers
  • USB mics
  • Bluetooth headsets

The Technology I Use

Probably because of their prevalence in the recording studios I worked in a long time ago, I am most comfortable on Macs—I'm writing this on the 2019 iMac I use for testing. I also have a MacBook Pro that gets plenty of similar use.

My workspace has a mini recording studio setup, and the the gear I work with there is a mix of items I've used forever (Paradigm Mini Monitors and a McIntosh stereo receiver) and newer gear I use for recording and review testing (such as the Universal Audio Apollo x16).

I'm obsessed with modern boutique analog synths—some of my favorites instruments in this realm are the Landscape Audio Stereo Field and HC-TT,  the Soma Enner, the Koma Field Kit, and the Lorre Mill Keyed Mosstone.

From my studio days, I'm comfortable using Pro Tools, and in recent years have branched out to other realms of creative software, like Adobe Premiere and After Effects.

I stream music, but I also still buy albums, digitally or on vinyl, and encourage anyone who wants fair compensation for musicians and engineers to do the same.

I also play lots of Wordle.

Read full bio

Eric Zeman

Eric Zeman

Managing Editor, Consumer Electronics

My Experience

I’m PCMag’s Managing Editor for Consumer Electronics content, overseeing an experienced team of reviewers and product testers. I’ve been covering technology for more than 25 years. Prior to PCMag, I worked at outlets such as Android Authority, Fortune, InformationWeek, and Phonescoop. 

The Technology I Use

My main tool for getting work done is a 14-inch MacBook Pro. It’s a silent and fast machine with a good keyboard and excellent battery life. When I’m not using my laptop, you can find me working (and relaxing) with an iPad Pro. I’ve come to rely on its 5G data connection when traveling, which makes it an essential part of my workflow. 

I consider myself an audiophile. That means my office and living room audio setups are total overkill, featuring advanced receivers, turntables, and Polk Audio speakers complete with subwoofers for the best possible sound, whether I’m listening to music or watching movies. My favorite earphones for private listening are the Sony WF-1000XM6.

When on the go, I typically use an iPhone 17 Pro Max for photos, but I don’t need much of an excuse to pull out my Sony mirrorless for high-resolution photography—especially when shooting sports. 

Read full bio