PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

GoPro Gives Up on Drones

After another rough round of financial reports, the company gives up on the Karma drone.

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Following layoffs last week, GoPro today delivered another rough round of financial numbers in its fourth quarter earnings call and announced that it's dropping development of drones.

Revenue fell short of estimates by a wide margin. The company expected to rake in $470 million in Q4, but came in at just $340 million.

GoPro opened to a big IPO in 2014, with stock selling for around $35 per share. Later that year it climbed to its highest point, just under $100. Today it's trading at around $6 per share. Revenue has steadily declined year over year, with each quarter seemingly worse than the last.

The company made some efforts to boost sales. It cut prices of its Hero5 and Hero6 cameras by $100 each in December. And it's doing some things to cut costs going forward. Nick Woodman, the company's enthusiastic CEO, is cutting his compensation to $1 for 2018. There's also a chance that GoPro will be sold to a private interest. The company has hired JPMorgan to faciliate a sale. We don't know if there's a potential suitor, or who that suitor may be.

Goodbye Karma

For now, however, it's saying farewell to drones. The Karma will remain on sale until there aren't any left. But we won't see any more roll off the production line, and we won't see a Karma 2. The company cites tight margins and hostile regulations as the reasons. It does promise to continue to service and support customers who have already purchased a Karma.

It's a shame. The Karma suffered from some first-generation problems of varying concern. Most notably, the first models off the production line had a battery door issue that would cause the drone to lose power and plunge out of the sky. GoPro quickly recalled the drone and corrected the issue.

The other problems we saw with the Karma were things that a second-generation model were sure to address. The controller screen wasn't bright enough and boasted a glossy finish, flight times were a bit short, and there wasn't any obstacle avoidance system.

But it had other things going for it, including tight integration with the camera and a removable gimbal that double as a handheld grip. No, it wasn't class-leading, but it wasn't a disaster either. We rated it at 3 stars when we reviewed it, before a firmware updated added a Follow Me mode.

That makes it not that different from another promising, but quickly discontinued drone, the 3D Robotics Solo. The Solo also used a GoPro as its main camera, delivering tight integration. But it just couldn't compete on price or performance with models from industry juggernaut DJI.

High-Quality Cameras

The Karma might not have been the best drone money could buy, but GoPro's action cameras certainly fit that bill. We awarded Editors' Choice to both the Hero5 and Hero6, which deliver the best video quality and toughest build in their class. So why aren't they selling like hot cakes?

Price is a big factor. Yes, the Hero6 is an excellent go-anywhere camera. But I thought it was a mistake to introduce it at $500. The Hero5's $400 intro price seemed like a better fit.

But even at $400, it's a premium option. We've seen a number of inexpensive cameras come out of China. Some are low-cost, low-quality products, ranging from barely functional to what you expect for less than a hundred bucks. But savvy consumers have picked up on a few alternatives that, while not built as tough as a GoPro, deliver similar video quality for less money. The $340 YI 4K+ and $160 SJCam SJ6 Legend are two examples.

Smartphones are also a big factor. You don't want to strap an $800 phone to a surfboard, but for more casual video use, the 4K video offered by flagship phones is good enough. Especially coupled with a gimbal—the new DJI Osmo Mobile 2 stabilizes smartphone footage for just $130.

GoPro is going to have to compete at lower prices to sell cameras. Keeping the Hero5 in the lineup at $300 is a good start. The company has touted its $200 Session as a low-cost option, and while it's tough and delivers quality video, its lack of an LCD makes it more cumbersome to use than it should be.

GoPro also has its premium Fusion 360-degree camera on the market now. With the demise of the Karma, it's the most expensive consumer product the company makes at $700. We'll see if that price holds steady or if it enjoys a reduction to help move units.

I don't see a day when GoPro's stock soars back up to $100 a share. But, for the sake of consumers who need a go-anywhere, do-anything, fully ruggedized camera, perhaps the company can survive as a leaner version of itself, even if it's one that has to sell to a smaller niche rather than a huge mass market.

Rob Marvin contributed to this article.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio