PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K Review - Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

The Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K camera captures the entire world around it, but the seams are visible.
Best Deal£225.98

Buy It Now

£225.98

Pros & Cons

    • Fully spherical video capture.
    • Solid audio quality plus mic input.
    • Multiple capture options.
    • Dust and splash resistant.
    • Tripod socket.
    • Visible stitching seams.
    • No in-camera stitching at 4K 24fps.
    • Buggy mobile software.
    • 4K spherical video locked at 24fps capture rate.
    • Expensive.

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K Specs

Dimensions 2.2 by 2.2 by 2.7 inches
Optical Stabilization None
Weight 5.5

JK Imaging (the licensee behind the Kodak camera brand) got into the 360-degree camera game early, albeit with single-lens models. The Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K ($499.99) is its first dual-lens camera, so it can capture the entire world that surrounds it. But seams from stitching are clearly visible in video, and the quality of the two lenses is not identical. For the price, you're better off with the Nikon KeyMission 360, a fully waterproof camera that stitches its highest quality video as it records. Our favorite 360 camera, the Samsung Gear 360, is a lot less expensive, and is your best bet if you own a compatible phone.

Design

The Orbit360 ($141.69 at Amazon) is a squat, squarish device with two lenses, each protected by a removable dome. Construction is plastic, finished in white. The camera measures 2.2 by 2.2 by 2.7 inches (HWD) and weighs 5.5 ounces. There's a standard tripod socket on the bottom, and the device itself is protected from dust and splashes, but won't survive being submerged in water.

There are a few control buttons on the camera itself. On top you'll find Power and Record, along with a small monochrome LCD. Wi-Fi and Menu buttons are on the side. There's enough information shown on the top LCD so that you can use the camera without an app, but it's easier to change modes and adjust settings using your smartphone. I think the camera would be simpler to use if it had separate buttons for video and still capture, as it's a bit of a pain to change modes on the fly.

A locking side door covers the removable battery and ports. There's micro USB, for data transfer and charging, as well as a microSD card slot, a micro HDMI output port, and a 3.5mm microphone jack. The battery is good for about 25 minutes of 360-degree recording.

Software Support

To control the camera with your phone, download the Pixpro360VR app for Android and iOS. It shows a live view on your phone's screen, and delivers full control over the camera. You can change shooting modes, start and stop recording or snap photos, and set white balance and exposure compensation.

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K : App

The app also supports transfer of images and video to your phone. It takes about four minutes to transfer a minute of 4K 360-degree video to an iPhone 8 Plus. That's not bad, but if you're shooting at 4K 24fps the video isn't stitched. (In-camera stitching is available at 15fps in 4K, which is choppy, or at 960p, which doesn't offer nearly enough resolution for the spherical format.) The Orbit saves video in a single file, but with each lens shown as its own circle. To put it in a format that can be shared and viewed in 360 degrees, you need to stitch it together into an equirectangular projection.

The app does that, but you need to be sure you select the right format for conversion—by default it simply extracts a 16:9 frame. That's useful in some situations, but most users shooting in 360 will want to share in 360.

The app requires about 6.5 minutes to stitch a minute of video—it can't handle conversions longer than that, so you'll need to keep clips short or convert longer videos piecemeal. But there's a big problem with the app—if your phone's screen turns off, or if you go into another app, the stitching stops and has to be started again fresh. Because of this I found myself tapping my phone's screen every few seconds while using it to convert video into a format that can be uploaded to Facebook and YouTube.

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K : App

If you need to convert a clip longer than a minute, you need to use a computer to convert video. Desktop software is available for macOS and Windows. The same minute-long clip took about four minutes to stitch on a 2014 MacBook Pro. The software is pretty basic, without an editing timeline, but it does let you trim clips and upload them to Facebook or YouTube.

Video and Image Quality

Other dual-lens 360 cameras use identical lenses. That's not the case with the Orbit. Its front lens is noticeably shorter than its rear, and covers a narrower (155-degree) field of view; the rear lens captures a huge 235-degree swath, wide enough to see behind itself.

There's some logic behind the choice. In addition to full spherical video, the Orbit uses the front lens by itself to capture flat 16:9 video at a 135-degree angle of view, similar to what you get with an action cam. The rear lens can be used on its own as well. Unfortunately, the design has a detrimental effect on video quality.

Let's talk about 4K first. The Orbit is a 4K camera, but it's also a 360-degree camera. Instead of constraining the pixels to a relatively narrow 16:9 frame, they're stretched out across a full sphere. Even the best 4K 360 cameras record video that is softer than traditional 1080p footage.

But the Orbit doesn't capture anywhere near the best 360 footage we've seen. You can see the seams where the two lenses meet very clearly, even with subjects in the distance. It's exacerbated by a noticeable difference in sharpness. Take a look at the hedges in the distance in the first scene of our test footage—you can make out details to the left, but to the right you just get blur. The blurriness extends across the entirety of that half of the scene. There's also a difference in exposure, which certainly doesn't help things.

Not surprisingly, the sharper footage is captured by the tighter, front camera. Both lenses are backed by a 20MP sensor, so it looks like the optics are simply better with the less ambitious half lens. This means you should put it toward the more important portion of action when recording video.

When recording 360 footage at 4K the frame rate is limited to 24fps or 15fps. Let's ignore 15fps—it's too choppy to be considered useable. Shooting at 24fps is great if you want a cinematic look, but more action-oriented videographers will want a 30 or 60fps option. You need to drop the resolution in half, to 960p, to get 30fps with both lenses. Right now, because of the processing power needed for 360 video, we haven't seen affordable 4K models that shoot at 60fps, but there are some out there that support 30fps.

Other frame rates are available if you don't use both lenses simultaneously. The front lens can shoot 16:9 4K at 30fps and 1080p or 720p at 60fps. The rear dome lens rolls 2880p at 24fps, but can go to 30fps at 2K 1920p. Still capture is available in all three modes too—you get 27MP images using both lenses, 8MP shots using the front camera, and 13MP images with the rear lens.

The Orbit360 doesn't do a great job under indoor lighting. Our outdoor test footage doesn't show any noise—and it shouldn't—but a clip captured in the relatively brightly lit interior of a bowling alley shows more noise than expected. And you shouldn't plan to get useable footage in a dim bar; it's just not going to happen.

Conclusions

The Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K has too many marks against it to recommend that you buy it. Video quality is the biggest issue. The 360-degree footage shows seams and only one half of the frame is reasonably crisp. And, while the mobile software is fine for remote control, it's simply baffling that the app goes to sleep and cancels stitching if your phone's screen turns off. Strike three is the price. For $500 you can get the Nikon KeyMission 360, which is fully waterproof and stitches footage in camera—the downside is that it doesn't let you switch to single-lens operation as you can with the Kodak.

Our Editors' Choice is the 2017 version of the Samsung Gear 360. It costs a lot less (and often sells well under its $230 list price), supports dual- and single-lens capture, and does a much better job with stitching. It has its own limitations—its mobile app only works with Samsung Android handsets and iPhones—and you do need to stitch video either with your phone or with a computer. But it's a more polished, consumer-ready product than the Orbit360.

Best Video Camera Picks

Video Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K Review - Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K

Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K Review

2.5 Fair

The Kodak Pixpro Orbit360 4K camera captures the entire world around it, but the seams are visible.

Get It Now
Best Deal£225.98

Buy It Now

£225.98

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio