PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Giroptic iO

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Giroptic iO is a small 360-degree add-on camera for smartphones. It's on the pricey side, and doesn't deliver high-resolution footage. - Consumer Electronics
2.0 Subpar

The Bottom Line

The Giroptic iO is a small 360-degree add-on camera for smartphones. It's on the pricey side, and doesn't deliver high-resolution footage.
Best Deal£59.82

Buy It Now

£59.82

Pros & Cons

    • Compact.
    • Easy to use.
    • Supports live broadcast.
    • Includes protective case.
    • Available for Android and iOS.
    • Poor 360-degree video quality.
    • Design encourages selfie videos.
    • Hollow audio.

Giroptic iO Specs

Dimensions 1.8 by 2.9 by 0.5 inches
Weight 2.5

The Giroptic iO ($249) is a tiny 360-degree add-on camera for smartphones. It garnered some attention in the tech community when Facebook distributed it to all attendees of its recent F8 conference. But if you're in the market for a spherical video camera, and it's your own money on the line, you can do a lot better. Insta360 sells add-on cameras for Android and iOS for less money that deliver better video quality. You can get a much better standalone camera in the Samsung Gear 360.

Design

The iO ($259.00 at Amazon) is a small camera with dual lenses, an internal battery, a micro USB charging port, and either a Lightning, micro USB, or USB-C connector to plug into your phone, depending on which version you buy. It measures 1.8 by 2.9 by 0.5 inches (HWD) and weighs about 2.5 ounces. The camera includes a removable blue clip to help better steady it on your phone, as well as a clear protective case with a cutout window so you can charge it within the case.

Because it has an internal battery, you'll need to charge the iO on its own. That may be a slight hassle, but it won't drain your phone's battery like the $130 Insta360 Air Android add-on.

The iO doesn't have its own memory card. It saves images and video to your phone, and is controlled by the free Giroptic iO app. The app doesn't offer any real controls; you can switch between Photo, Video, and Live modes, but you can't adjust exposure or change quality settings. You can stream to Facebook, Periscope, or YouTube.

Video and Image Quality

Video is saved in MP4 format and stitched automatically. The resolution is limited, 1,920 by 960 pixels at an 18.9Mbps bit rate. Close to HD quality is fine for flat video, but when you stretch those pixels out across a virtual sphere you end up with footage that's soft, without any real definition. Video quality is very similar to the Insta360 Air, which you can get for half the price, but is only available for Android phones.

The closest competing model for iPhones, the Insta360 Nano, records better video, 2,880 by 1,440, but at a lower bit rate (13Mbps). Even though the data rate is lower, you get sharper footage from the Nano, which is priced $50 less.

Audio is also an issue with the Giroptic. When speaking directly into the direction of the camera with it just a couple feet from my face, audio sounds very hollow and distant. That brings up another issue with the design of the iO itself—it's really only good for selfie videos. It clamps on to your phone, which is a handheld device unless you buy a cumbersome tripod clip. Good luck if you want to record video that doesn't show off your face. A standalone camera, like the Gear 360, lets you get more varied shots.

The iO shoots still images in JPG format at 7.3MP resolution, about twice the pixels as you get from each video frame. Image quality is on par with a smartphone camera, but the ultra-wide nature of the lenses limits the detail you see in distant objects. I can see the painted constellations on the ceiling of the Grand Central Terminal waiting room above more clearly in an image than in a video, but the photo is not without issues.

There's a noticeable difference in exposure between the two lenses, with half the ceiling appearing slightly darker. Bright light coming in from the huge windows is blown out, a product of the limited dynamic range you get with a small image sensor. Stitching is also imperfect. We expect seam lines at close distances, it's just the nature of a dual-lens camera. But the skylights and stonework high above me in Grand Central are mismatched along the seam line, which is a real shame.

Conclusions

The Giroptic iO costs more than one of the better standalone 360 degree cameras we've tested, the $230 Sasmung Gear 360. The iO is smaller, and plugs right into your phone rather than connecting wirelessly, but that's where the advantages end. Its video and image quality are subpar, and you still have to remember to charge it separately as it isn't powered by your phone. If you prefer an add-on camera for your phone, Android users will get similar video quality from the $130 Insta360 Air, and iPhone owners can opt for the Insta360 Nano, priced at $200. Skip the iO, as there are better values out there.

Best Video Camera Picks

Video Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The Giroptic iO is a small 360-degree add-on camera for smartphones. It's on the pricey side, and doesn't deliver high-resolution footage. - Consumer Electronics

Giroptic iO

2.0 Subpar

The Giroptic iO is a small 360-degree add-on camera for smartphones. It's on the pricey side, and doesn't deliver high-resolution footage.

Get It Now
Best Deal£59.82

Buy It Now

£59.82

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio