PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM is half the price of its Leica counterpart, but its edge performance leaves something to be desired. - Digital Cameras
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM is half the price of its Leica counterpart, but its edge performance leaves something to be desired.

Pros & Cons

    • Compact.
    • Good center-weighted sharpness.
    • 0.5-meter close focus.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Solid build quality.
    • Weak edge performance.
    • Hood not included.
    • Manual focus only.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 28
Dimensions 2.4 by 2.1 inches
Type Lens
Weight 8.1

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM ($1,087 list) is a compact wide-angle lens that delivers a classic field of view when paired with a full-frame digital rangefinder like the Leica M (Typ 240). It can also be used (via an adapter) with a mirrorless camera like the Sony Alpha 7R. It's an affordable alternative to the Leica Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 ASPH.. The Biogon isn't quite as compact as its Leica counterpart, and its edge performance suffers unless its aperture is narrowed a bit, but it sells for about half the price.

The Zeiss measures 2.4 by 2.1 inches (HD), weighs 8.1 ounces, and supports 46mm front filters. It's a bit bigger than the Leica Elmarit—it measures 1.8 by 2 inches, weighs 6.3 ounces, and uses smaller 39mm filters. The Leica lens includes a clip-on hood, but you'll have to spend an extra $84 to get the metal hood for the Zeiss Biogon. There's no arguing with the physical qualities of the Biogon. Its barrel is all metal and its focus ring is ergonomically excellent. It's tight, so it won't drift unexpectedly, but very smooth in operation.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM : Sample Image

Other differences between the Zeiss 28mm and the Leica Elmarit include the aperture ring—the Zeiss goes from f/2.8 to f/22 in third-stop increments, but the Elmarit's minimum aperture is f/16 and the ring is set to half-stops. The Zeiss focuses a bit closer (0.5 meter), but you'll need to guess the focus distance when working closer than 0.7 meter, or use a camera with Live View, as Leica rangefinder cameras only offer coupled focus to 0.7 meter.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness and distortion characteristics of the lens, using the full-frame Leica M (Typ 240) as the test body. Distortion is minimal—it's less than 1 percent, which isn't noticeable in field conditions. We look for a lens to do better than 1,800 lines per picture height using a center-weighted measurement of a standard SFRPlus test chart, and the Biogon does that at its maximum aperture. At f/2.8 it delivers 2,213 lines thanks to excellent center and mid-way sharpness. But the outer edges of the frame are very disappointing; they show just 712 lines.

Narrowing the aperture to f/4 improves edges to a more respectable 1,580 lines and the overall sharpness to 2,806 lines. At f/5.6 the Biogon is sharp from corner to corner, scoring 3,135 lines across the frame with edges that approach 2,100 lines. And at f/8 it delivers it best performance—3,194 lines across the frame with edges that record about 2,550 lines per picture height. The Leica Elmarit-M also showed edges that were weaker than the center; at f/2.8 the edges topped 1,300 lines; they improved to 1,879 lines at f/4 and were a fantastic 2,700 lines at f/2.8. The Leica lens is twice the price of the Zeiss, but its optical performance is better at comparable apertures.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM : Sample Image

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM is a solid wide-angle option for the rangefinder shooters. It's not quite the equal of the Leica Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 ASPH. in terms of sharpness, but if you stop it down a bit the gap between the two lenses is less apparent than it is at f/2.8. At close to $1,100 it's not a budget lens, until you look at the $2,200 sticker price that accompanies the Leica Elmarit. The Biogon also offers the ability to focus a little bit closer, and boasts more precise control over aperture. If you can live with a lens that isn't a perfect performer from edge-to-edge at its maximum aperture, the Biogon will serve you well.

 

Final Thoughts

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM is half the price of its Leica counterpart, but its edge performance leaves something to be desired. - Digital Cameras

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM

3.5 Good

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/28 ZM is half the price of its Leica counterpart, but its edge performance leaves something to be desired.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio