PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras
 & More »
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS - Digital Cameras
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS is a low-cost zoom that puts more emphasis on size and weight than absolute image quality.
Best Deal£129.99

Buy It Now

£129.99

Pros & Cons

    • Light and compact.
    • Quick, quiet autofocus.
    • Stabilized optics.
    • Minimal focus breathing.
    • Audible zoom motor.
    • Omits dust and splash protection.
    • Edges never sharpen, even when stopped down.
    • Zoom speed not adjustable.

Sony 16-50mm Retractable Zoom Lens Specs

Type Lens

The Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS ($299.99) is the standard kit lens for the company's APS-C mirrorless camera line, which includes the popular a6000 series. The zoom is one of the smallest and lightest you'll find for any system, and while it's not as stunning a performer as pricier glass, it serves its purpose as a starter zoom for budding photographers. You should absolutely buy it bundled with a camera, though, as it typically slashes the actual cost to about $100.

Compact, but Not Silent

The E PZ 16-50mm is the smallest zoom in Sony's library, adding only 1.2 inches of depth to the camera body when in its powered-down, collapsed position. The throat is as narrow as the lens mount, a 2.6-inch diameter, and the lens just about doubles in length when it's powered on and ready to use. Despite its small size, Sony has managed to include optical stabilization in the lens.

Sony a6100 : Sample Image

Sony doesn't include, or market, a lens hood. I wouldn't worry about it—the lens can show some flare when shot straight into the sun, but a hood won't do anything to remedy it. It will stop flare coming in at very steep, close angles to the lens, but you can usually avoid that by slightly moving your camera. Still, if you're worried, you can spend $10 on a hood from Fotodiox; it screws into the 40.5mm filter thread.

The outer barrel is fabricated from lightweight metal—the lens weighs just 4.1 ounces. Sony doesn't include any sort of dust or splash protection, which is offered in its midrange and upper-echelon cameras, including the a6400 and a6600. As of 2020 the lens is only sold in black, but has been sold in a silver finish in years past.

Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS : Sample Image

The lens does have to extend when powering on your camera, which takes about a second. The motor that handles this, and the zoom operation, is a little loud, though. For video, you'll want to avoid zooming during shots if you plan on keeping the in-camera audio. Autofocus is nearly silent, though, a plus for video. Breathing, the effect where the angle of view changes along with focus, is minimal—another plus for video use.

There's a single control ring on the lens, along with a zoom rocker switch. If your camera is set to autofocus, the ring adjusts focus as well. The zoom speed isn't adjustable, though, and tends to move rather quickly. This is fine for stills, but will make it difficult to get a slow, smooth zoom in a video shot.

Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS : Sample Image

Focus is available to 9.8 inches, good enough for 1:4.8 life-size reproduction. It's not an extreme macro, but it does let you bring smaller subjects into view when zoomed in and focused close. The image above, shot at 50mm f/8 with the NEX-3N, is uncropped.

Pretty Good Image Quality

I've used the 16-50mm with various cameras over the years. For this review, I used the a6400 and Imatest software for our lab tests, and also used the lens with the a6100. These models use Sony's current-generation 24MP APS-C image sensor, also in the a6600.

Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS : Sample Image

At 16mm f/3.5, the lens resolves about 2,270 lines on a center-weighted evaluation. Details in the central area of the frame are very sharp, but give way to slight softness as you look toward the area between center and edge. The periphery is blurry, and it doesn't get any better at narrower f-stops.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Stopping down just a little bit to f/4 ups contrast in the mid parts of the frame, bringing them in line with the 2,380-line average score—a result we consider to be very good. It manages excellent results at f/5.6 and f/8, a little better than 2,500 lines, and falls back to very good quality at f/11 and f/16.

Optical diffraction, the effect that scatters light as it passes through a small opening, is significant at f/22, and makes the entire image a bit soft (1,465 lines). This isn't just an issue with the 16-50mm, though, it's something you get with any lens.

At the midpoint of the zoom, 33mm, the widest available aperture if f/5. It's also the pinnacle of optical performance, netting images with excellent clarity through much of the frame and a strong 2,775-line average. Edges are pretty good too (2,135 lines), and get better at f/8 (2,661 lines). Diffraction starts to show its effects at f/11, but it doesn't kill image quality until you stop down to f/22 (1,599 lines) or the minimum f/32 (910 lines) setting.

Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS : Sample Image

Image quality at 50mm is similar to what you get at 16mm, but with a narrower maximum aperture. At 50mm f/5.6, the average resolution is very good (2,330 lines), but edges and corners are quite soft. It's a little bit better at f/8, but peak performance is at f/11 at this focal length—our lab tests report an excellent 2,720 lines, with sharp results from center to edge. Images hold up at f/16, but you'll lose a lot at f/22 (1,680 lines) and the minimum f/36 setting (762 lines).

Distortion isn't a concern when shooting in JPG format or processing Raw images—your camera or Raw processor will leverage a profile to remove it automatically. The story is the same with the vignette, it's well controlled.

Get It in a Kit

The Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS isn't a perfect performer, but it gets the job done within the parameters of its design. Sony's engineers clearly prioritized size and weight, and pairing the zoom with an a6000 series camera makes the kit something you can slide into a big coat pocket. No one will get excited about the narrow f-stop or noisy, slightly oversensitive zoom control, but it does what it needs to do.

Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS : Sample Image

There are better lenses available from Sony, but you'll need to spend more. The E 18-135mm is light and compact when you consider its bigger zoom power, and an excellent performer, but costs a little more than twice as much, $650. There's also the premium E 16-55mm F2.8 for $1,300—it's an outstanding zoom, but not an option if you're shopping on a budget.

You're most likely thinking about the 16-50mm as a starter lens for a new camera, and that's what it's for. I would never recommend that you spend $300 to buy it on its own, but at the $100 premium it adds to a6000 series camera kits, it remains a good starter option, and an entry point into Sony's overall excellent camera system.

Final Thoughts

Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS - Digital Cameras

Sony 16-50mm Retractable Zoom Lens

3.0 Average

The Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS is a low-cost zoom that puts more emphasis on size and weight than absolute image quality.

Get It Now
Best Deal£129.99

Buy It Now

£129.99

About Our Experts

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio