PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple Faces Supreme Court in App Store Monopoly Battle

On Monday, the court heard oral arguments in a long-standing legal battle over Apple's strict control of the iOS app ecosystem. Apple says it's merely maintaining a marketplace for apps, but critics claim it's practices are an antitrust violation.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The Supreme Court is considering whether Apple's App Store is a monopoly and if consumers can sue the company over it.

On Monday, the court heard oral arguments in a long-standing legal battle that could shake up Apple's strict control over the iOS ecosystem. Currently, the App Store is the only official way to download apps for your iPhone or iPad. But in 2011, a group of consumers filed a class-action suit, alleging the model was an antitrust violation.

"Our assertion is that, with multiple sellers, multiple suppliers of the apps, we would be able to buy them [the apps] at a lower price," David Frederick, an attorney representing the consumers, told the high court, according to an official transcript.

Apple, however, wants the Supreme Court to dismiss the suit. Its argument: the company is merely providing a marketplace for the apps.

During oral arguments, the justices focused on how Apple extracts revenue from the App Store: With each sale, the company takes a 30 percent cut from the developer. Frederick claims this fee structure can cause consumers to overpay for their apps when there's nowhere else to buy them.

In its defense, Apple said the company plays no role in setting an app's price; that decision is up to the app's developer. "Consumers do not pay the 30 percent commission," the company's attorney, Daniel Wall, told the court.

However, a few of the justices expressed some skepticism with Apple's arguments. The plaintiffs "are claiming their injury is the suppression of a cheaper price," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Wall.

Justice Elena Kagan also said that all app purchases occur through Apple, not through the developer. "I pay Apple directly with the credit card information that I've supplied to Apple. From my perspective, I've just engaged in a one-step transaction with Apple," she said.

Apple requested that the Supreme Court hear the case in 2017 after a lower federal court overturned an earlier attempt by the company to overturn the class-action lawsuit against it. If the Supreme Court rules against Apple, the company risks facing more antitrust lawsuits and the prospect of paying millions in damages.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio