PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Judge: DOGE Improperly Used ChatGPT to Help Cut $100M of Humanities Funding

DOGE used OpenAI’s ChatGPT in parts of its decision-making process, but failed to determine if the chatbot's output made sense, a judge finds.

 & Will McCurdy Contributor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: J Studios via Getty Images)

A federal judge in New York has ruled that the Trump administration's cancellation of more than 140 humanities grants, worth over $100 million, was unconstitutional.

The case was brought by the nonprofit Authors Guild and several individual recipients of grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities that were cut by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) because they included alleged ties to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In her ruling, US District Judge Colleen McMahon highlighted how DOGE used OpenAI’s ChatGPT in parts of its decision-making process, but failed to determine if the chatbot's output made sense.

Justin Fox, a former staffer at DOGE, testified that his team used the AI tool to “pull out anything to do with DEI” and to “[h]ighlight why [a] grant may relate to DEI.” According to the filing, ChatGPT was directed to analyze a spreadsheet filled with grant descriptions and was prompted: “Does the following relate at all to DEI? Respond factually in less than 120 characters.”

However, according to the filing, DOGE’s team did not provide ChatGPT with a definition of “DEI.” Fox also testified that he was unsure of ChatGPT’s understanding of the term, and the chatbot was not directed to factor in “the purpose, methodology, or scholarly substance of a project.”

Another project that had its grant funding terminated, called “How the City Became Plastic,” which focused on how the plastic industry lobbied city officials, was flagged as DEI-related despite focusing on industrial policy and microplastics filtering into the water supply.

"The record reflects that these ChatGPT determinations were generated without any additional context beyond the cursory spreadsheet descriptions themselves," the judge wrote.

The judge also ruled that, due to the “hallucinatory propensities” of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, it would “hardly be surprising” if ChatGPT inferred that DOGE officials supplied rationales “simply in order to satisfy the user’s perceived demand.”

“The utter lack of reasoning behind so many of its ‘rationales’ certainly suggest[s] as much,” the judge concluded.

"The DOGE terminations were sweeping," the judge adds. Approximately 1,477 grants were placed on DOGE’s “to cancel” lists, and only about 40 grants awarded during the Biden administration were spared. Those were largely archival projects such as the Papers of George Washington, the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, the Adams Papers, and the Einstein Papers.

ChatGPT usage could continue to crop up in parts of government administration. As of March 2026, Senate aides have been allowed to use AI chatbots such as Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot to assist with “routine work,” such as summarizing information.

About Our Expert

Will McCurdy

Will McCurdy

Contributor

I’m a reporter covering weekend news. Before joining PCMag in 2024, I picked up bylines in BBC News, The Guardian, The Times of London, The Daily Beast, Vice, Slate, Fast Company, The Evening Standard, The i, TechRadar, and Decrypt Media.

I’ve been a PC gamer since you had to install games from multiple CD-ROMs by hand. As a reporter, I’m passionate about the intersection of tech and human lives. I’ve covered everything from crypto scandals to the art world, as well as conspiracy theories, UK politics, and Russia and foreign affairs.

Read full bio