PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Democrats to Trump: Taking a Cut From Nvidia's Chip Exports Seems Illegal

Senators mainly cite the national security concerns of sending AI tech to China, but also note that the US Constitution says, 'No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.'

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Democratic senators say President Trump's plan to take a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD’s AI chip sales to China appears to be illegal. 

In a Friday letter to Trump, six lawmakers questioned the legality of his plan and urged the president to “reverse” his decision to let Nvidia and AMD export their AI GPUs to China. 

“These sales to a leading adversary run counter to US national security interests, and the collection of fees appear[s] to violate US statutes and may even be unconstitutional,” they wrote.

The senators—Mark Warner of Virginia, Chuck Schumer of New York, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Chris Coons of Delaware, and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts—point to a US export law that prohibits the federal government from charging a fee for processing or considering an export license “or other authorization or other request.”

The letter suggests that since Nvidia and AMD’s AI GPUs are classified as a controlled export requiring the US to issue a license, taking a 15% cut should be barred. 

The senators did not elaborate on the unconstitutionality issue, but Section 9 says, “No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.”

Much of the letter reiterates Democrats' concerns that permitting the AI chip exports will only aid China’s AI ambitions at the expense of US national security. “The willingness displayed in this arrangement to ‘negotiate’ away America’s competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm,” the lawmakers wrote. 

The letter demands that the White House provide details on how the US will collect payments from Nvidia and AMD, who was behind the deal, and how the funds will be used.

On Monday, Trump confirmed that the US had “negotiated a little deal” with Nvidia to permit the company to export the H20 GPU, which he called “obsolete,” although Democrats disagree.

Still, the White House has also said it’s working through the "legalities" of such an arrangement, all while hinting similar export deals could be reached with more firms. 

“Well, look, right now, it stands with these two companies. Perhaps, it could span in the future to other companies,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday. “The legality of it, the mechanics of it, is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce.”

AMD didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. But Nvidia said: "The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit."

The Commerce Department previously told PCMag that, "The Trump Administration will consider any H20 license applications carefully, accounting for both the benefits and the costs of potential exports from America, and considering the views of experts across the US government.”

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio