PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Zeiss Batis 1.8/85

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 - Zeiss Batis 1.8/85
4.5 Outstanding

The Bottom Line

The Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 isn't a perfect lens, but it's close. Sony Alpha shooters should take note.
Best Deal£729

Buy It Now

£729

Pros & Cons

    • Very sharp form edge to edge.
    • Wide aperture.
    • Dust- and splash-resistant construction.
    • Pricey.
    • Noticeable pincushion distortion.

Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 85
Dimensions 3.6 by 3.2 inches
Lens Mount Sony E
Stabilization Optical
Type Lens
Weight 1.05

Zeiss makes an 85mm lens that is, for all intents and purposes, as optically perfect as a lens can be. It's the Otus 85/1.4 ($4,490.00 at Amazon) , and it's huge, heavy, manual focus only, and priced at nearly five grand. For the rest of us—at least the rest of us that shoot with Sony's mirrorless camera system—Zeiss makes the Batis 1.8/85 ($1,199). The lens isn't quite as perfect as the Otus, but it renders similarly, supports autofocus, and while it's not a budget lens by any means, it's a bargain when compared with the Otus. That make the Batis 1.8/85 an easy pick for Editors' Choice honors.

Design
The Batis is styled much like newer Zeiss manual focus SLR lenses, including the Otus and Milvus series. But it's an autofocus lens, compatible with both full-frame and APS-C Sony mirrorless cameras. The barrel is black metal, with the Zeiss brand badge on the side in blue. The manual focus ring is finished in smooth black rubber, and sits at the rear of the barrel, near the base of the lens.

Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 : Sample Image

The 85mm prime measures 3.6 by 3.2 inches (HD), weighs just under 1.1 pounds, and supports 67mm front filters. It's not nearly as long as the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS (5.1 by 3.1 inches), but the two lenses aren't that far off in weight—the macro is slightly heftier at 1.3 pounds. Of course, the macro doesn't capture nearly as much light wide open as the f/1.8 Batis, but it does focus much closer. There's probably room in your kit for both lenses, if your wallet can handle it.

The Batis ships with front and rear caps, as well as a reversible lens hood. It has an integrated monochrome OLED display that shows the current focus distance and depth of field at the set aperture. By default this is enabled only when the lens is set to manual focus mode, but you can set it to appear in every focus mode, or disable it completely if you prefer. As with most other Sony E-mount lenses, manual focus is an electronic affair. Turning the focus ring activates an internal motor that moves the lens elements. If you prefer a true manual focus feel, the Otus (or another SLR lens mounted via an adapter) is a better fit. Or you can opt for the Samyang 85mm f/1.4, a modern manual focus lens that is available in a version that can be used with Sony mirrorless cameras sans adapter.

Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 : Sample Image

The Batis can focus as close as 2.6 feet (0.8-meter). That's perfectly fine for portraiture and general photography, and when you're shooting at a wider aperture you'll have no problem getting a blurry background. The Otus offers a maximum f/1.4 aperture, and an identical close focus distance, so it can create a slightly shallower depth of field. But again, there's that price difference, and the convenience of autofocus. The Batis includes optical image stabilization, so you can pair it with an original Alpha 7 model and enjoy the benefits of steadied shots and video. It also works in conjunction with the in-body stabilization of bodies in the Alpha 7 II ($898.00 at Amazon) series to provide 5-axis correction.

Image Quality
I used Imatest to see just how sharp the Batis is when paired with the 42-megapixel Alpha 7R II ($1,798.00 at Amazon) . At f/1.8 the lens scores 2,918 lines on a center-weighted sharpness test. That's a pretty incredible number, well in excess of the 1,800 lines we look for in a photo, and even more impressive is the fact that the edges of the frame are just as sharp as the center.

Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 : Sample Image

At f/2.8 the overall score improves just slightly to 2,958. At f/4 and f/5.6 it shows about 3,150 lines, it improves to 3,422 lines at f/8, and peaks at 3,565 lines at f/11. At f/16 diffraction diminishes slightly from image quality, but the Batis still shows 3,217 lines. I don't recommend narrowing the aperture beyond that; at f/22 the lens drops all the way to 2,314 lines on the sharpness test.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

There is some loss of light at the corners at wider apertures. At f/1.8 the corners show -1.8EV illumination when compared with the center of the frame, which is something you'll likely notice in field conditions. Stopping down to f/2 improves this only slightly (-1.4EV). At f/2.8 and f/4 the corners show about -0.8EV, which isn't a major issue, and beyond that it drops to about -0.5EV, which you'll struggle to see. Some portrait photographers prefer a vignette around subjects, going as far as to add one using software in some cases, so this isn't a huge issue. If you prefer even illumination, it's a very simple matter to achieve it using the Lightroom CC ($9.99/Month at Adobe) vignette slider tool or Adobe's profile for this lens. The latter is a one-click correction tool that is tuned for each specific f-stop.

Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 : Sample Image

More of an issue is distortion. The lens shows quite a bit of pincushion distortion, about 2.3 percent. Straight horizontal lines bow inward quite distinctly when shot with the Batis. Thankfully the Lightroom lens profile corrects for this, just as it does for loss of light in the corners of the frame. But if you're concerned with your ability to post images without extreme edits, distortion can be a concern, especially when shooting images with straight lines prevalent in the frame.

Conclusion
The Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 is a near-perfect lens, at a price that's well shy of the company's manual focus Otus line. It's tack sharp from corner to corner, even at f/1.8, captures a heck of a lot of light, and draws wonderful portraits with a very shallow depth of field. The only real complaint is the pincushion distortion that it exhibits, and that's something that's easily corrected on a computer. If you're in want of a prime lens in this focal range for your Sony mirrorless system, and you put an emphasis on portrait and general photography, look no further. Its major competition, the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS, is of a very similar focal length and price, but its optics are tuned for narrow aperture macro photography. Both lenses are excellent, and both earn Editors' Choice marks—it's up to you whether you'd rather have the wide aperture offered by the Batis, or the incredibly close focus capability of the Sony FE 90mm. If your pockets are deep enough, there's no reason not to carry both in your gear bag.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 - Zeiss Batis 1.8/85

Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 Review

4.5 Outstanding

The Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 isn't a perfect lens, but it's close. Sony Alpha shooters should take note.

Get It Now
Best Deal£729

Buy It Now

£729

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio