PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Xerox WorkCentre PE120i

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - All-in-One Printers
2.0 Subpar

The Bottom Line

The Xerox WorkCentre PE120i offers good to excellent output and performance for text and graphics, but not photos. And it can scan to and fax from your PC only over direct connections. That makes it of most interest if you don't print many photos, and don't plan to put it on a network.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Excellent text quality.
    • 50-sheet automatic document feeder.
    • Functions as standalone copier and fax machine.
    • Includes Ethernet connection.
    • Can't scan or fax over a network, although it can scan to and fax from a directly connected PC.
    • Slow performance for files with photos.

Xerox WorkCentre PE120i Specs

Connection Type: Ethernet
Maximum Scan Area: 8.5" x 11"
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Printer Category: Laser
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Mono): 22 ppm
Scanner Optical Resolution: 600 pixels per inch
Scanner Type: Flatbed with ADF (Standard or Optional)
Standalone Copier and Fax: Copier
Standalone Copier and Fax: Fax
Type: All-In-One

The Xerox WorkCentre PE120i is a standalone copier and fax machine as well as a printer. It can't scan or fax over a network, but connect to it directly and you can use it to fax from or scan to your computer, including scanning to e-mail. This trade-off is a big part of what makes the PE120i worth considering, though it's far short of a slam-dunk choice.

Physical setup is simple. But rather than offering the fully automated network installation that's standard today, the PE120i requires manual network installation, with step-by-step instructions that are, unfortunately, on CD only.

Performance on our business applications suite was a relatively slow 16 minutes 49 seconds, compared with 8:42 for the $600 21-ppm Brother MFC-8840DN. Nearly 7.5 minutes of the difference between the two, however, came from just two Acrobat files. The PE120i actually tied with or was faster than the Brother printer on 7 of the other 11 files. It was faster on files that contained only text, not far behind on files with graphics, and noticeably slower on files with photos, including the Acrobat files.

Quality dovetails with performance on both strengths and weaknesses. Text garnered a rating of excellent, with more than half the fonts we test with easily readable at 4 points and none requiring more than 8 points. Graphics earned a rating of good, marred only by minor issues, most notably a streaking effect in some output. But photos were at the high end of poor, hurt primarily by unacceptable posterization.

All this makes the PE120i a marginal choice if you care at all about printing photos or want to connect over a network.

Sub-ratings:
Text:
Graphics:
Photos:

More multifunction printer reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - All-in-One Printers

Xerox WorkCentre PE120i

2.0 Subpar

The Xerox WorkCentre PE120i offers good to excellent output and performance for text and graphics, but not photos. And it can scan to and fax from your PC only over direct connections. That makes it of most interest if you don't print many photos, and don't plan to put it on a network.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio