PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Xerox Phaser 6130/N

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Laser Printers
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Xerox Phaser 6130/N's small size and light weight make it a good choice for a small-office or home-office network color laser.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • High-quality output, particularly for text.
    • Small.
    • Lightweight.
    • Network-ready.
    • Slow.
    • Limited paper handling.
    • Effective monochrome speed is below the rated speed.

Xerox Phaser 6130/N Specs

Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, graph: 0:18 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, table A (with grid): 0:17 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 3 pages, charts and graphs: 0:37 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft PowerPoint 2003 - 4 full-page slides: 1:07 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Word 2003 - 2 pages, text: 0:23 (min:sec)
Color or Monochrome: 1-pass color
Connection Type: Ethernet
Connection Type: USB
Cost Per Page (Color): 15.4 cents
Cost Per Page (Mono): 3 cents
Direct Printing from Cameras: No
Duty Cycle: 40000 pages per month
Input Capacity (printer input only): 251 sheets
LCD Preview Screen: No
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Network-Ready: Yes
Number of Cartridges: 4
Number of Ink Colors: 4
Photos - HIGH -QUALITY SETTINGS - Adobe Photoshop 7 - Average output time per print: 4" x 6" prints : 1:21 (min:sec)
Print Duplexing: No
Printer Category: Laser
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Color): 12 ppm
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Mono): 16 ppm
Technology (for laser category only): Laser
Type: Printer Only

When I unpacked the Xerox Phaser 6130/N ($450 street), my first reaction was that it looked like a shrunken-down version of other Phaser models. It seemed a lightweight, compact solution for anyone needing a color laser for a small office, home office, or personal use. As I set up the printer, however, opening various panels and examining the inside, I had a nagging feeling that I'd seen a similar print engine from a different vendor.

As it turned out, I had. Although it looks very different on the outside, the 6130/N is built around the same Fuji-Xerox engine as the Dell Color Laser Printer 1320c. The Xerox version costs significantly more, however. This is partly because it adds a built-in network connector and partly because it includes PostScript, which takes the work of processing the image off the computer and into the printer instead.

At just 38 pounds and 15.3 by 15.8 by 15.5 inches (HWD), the 6130/N is unusually small and lightweight for a color laser. But although that makes finding room for it somewhat easier, this printer is still a little too imposing for me to want it sitting on my desk.

Physical setup is generally typical for a low-end color laser. You remove the packing materials, load paper, plug in the cable and power cord, and install the software. Removing the packing materials, however, takes a bit more work than with most lasers. Unlike with most, you have to open the front cover, so that it lies flat, remove a relatively heavy imaging unit, pull eight restraining ribbons, and reinsert the unit.

The process involves moving the imaging unit over the printer's transfer belt both on the way out and on the way in. I was a little uneasy about moving a heavy object over the exposed belt, but Xerox says it's hard to damage the belt, which is under warranty in any case.

Xerox's network installation is worth special mention for being automated to the maximum extent possible. Finding the printer on the network and installing the Windows XP driver for my tests took just three mouse clicks. (The printer also ships with a Vista driver.)

The key similarity between the Dell and Xerox printers is the engine speed. In both cases, the engine rating is 16 pages per minute (ppm) for monochrome and 12 ppm for color. For all practical purposes, however, the real-world rating (for both printers) is 12 ppm for both monochrome and color.

If the printer driver is set for color, the 6130/N will print in the 12-ppm color mode even if all you're printing is black-and-white text. If it's set for black and white, it will print at 16 ppm, but it will print everything, including color documents, in black and white. I'd expect most people will simply leave the printer in the default color mode instead of checking the setting each time. I ran all my tests based on that assumption.

On our business applications suite, the 6130/N took its time, with a sluggish 15-minute, 51-second total (timed with QualityLogic's hardware and software, www.qualitylogic.com). As a point of reference, the somewhat more expensive Editors' Choice Xerox Phaser 6180N was significantly faster, at 10:22. Even the less expensive Dell 1320c was faster, at 12:57. Photo speed was also slow for a color laser, averaging 1:21 for each 4-by-6 and 3:02 for each 8-by-10.

The 6130/N's output quality is its saving grace, with particularly high-quality text and somewhat better overall quality than most color lasers.

The 6130/N can handle any text you're likely to throw at it. Text quality was just a half step below the very best laser output, with more than half the fonts on our text tests easily readable and well formed at 5 points, some qualifying at 4 points, and no standard fonts needing more than 6 points. Even a heavily stylized font with thick strokes that most printers have trouble printing at sizes below 20 points qualified as both easily readable and well formed at 12 points.

Graphics quality was a match for most color lasers, and better than many. I saw some dithering in the form of relatively obvious graininess and some misregistration (with small white gaps around blocks of color), but the printer also handled lines better than most, printing thin lines that tend to disappear on many printers. The output is good enough for any internal business need, including items like PowerPoint handouts. Depending on how much of a perfectionist you are, you may consider the output good enough for important clients or customers.

Photos were near photo quality—able to pass for true photo quality at a quick glance or from arm's length. They're easily good enough for output like company or client newsletters, or even photos headed for a company bulletin board or a refrigerator door at home.

The 6130/N is short on options—there's no duplexer, for example, and no additional paper trays to add to the standard 250-sheet tray. The best reason to get it is if you have a particular need for PostScript, which ensures that documents will always print with exactly the same layout from any PostScript printer. (Other printer languages can change the layout by altering settings like printer resolution.) But whether you specifically need PostScript or not, the 6130/N is a capable printer, and a more than reasonable choice for any small office.

Check out the Xerox Phaser 6130/N's test scores.

More Laser Printer Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Laser Printers

Xerox Phaser 6130/N

3.0 Average

The Xerox Phaser 6130/N's small size and light weight make it a good choice for a small-office or home-office network color laser.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio