PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

The Latest Technology Product Reviews, News, Tips, and Deals

 & Tim Gideon Contributing Editor, Audio

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
PCMag is your complete guide to computers, peripherals and upgrades. We test and review tech products and services, report technology news and trends, and provide shopping advice with price comparisons. - Sony XBA-S65
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

Sony's XBA-S65 is an affordable, great-sounding, and extremely secure-fitting pair of moisture-resistant exercise earphones.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Distortion-free, high-quality audio performance.
    • Sweat-proof, water-resistant, washable.
    • Adjustable rubber loop helps provide secure, comfortable fit.
    • No built-in phone controls.
    • Bass response is ideal for audiophiles, but may seem weak for some seeking exercise motivation from enhanced low end.

Sony XBA-S65 Specs

Phone Controls
Type In-Ear
Wireless

best of the Year 2012 43x85 The past year has seen the introduction of numerous exercise-focused earphones, like Monster's iSport Immersion In-Ear Headphones ($179.95, 3.5 stars) and Polk Audio's UltraFit3000 ($99.95, 3.5 stars). Joining the ranks in early 2012 is the Sony XBA-S65, part of Sony's recently unveiled, extensive line of balanced armature earphones—a line that includes the Sony XBA-NC85D ($499.99, 3 stars). At $89.99 direct, the XBA-S65 is far more affordable than its noise-canceling sibling, but also less expensive than some of its direct competition, like the Monster iSport. Price isn't the only thing the XBA-S65 has going for it, however: It features a unique, adjustable rubber loop on each earpiece that provides a very secure fit. Throw in the sweat-proof, water-resistant, washable design and the high-quality, distortion-free audio performance, and the XBA-S65 is a steal, earning it our Editors' Choice award for gym-friendly headphones.

Design

With its white cable and oddly-shaped, black earpieces, the XBA-S65 has a unique look that immediately differentiates itself from its exercise earphone competition. The Sony logo is emblazoned prominently on each earpiece, but it's the earpiece itself that catches the eye. Where some new models utilize small stems that extend from the earpiece and rest against the outer ear for support, like the iSport and the non-exercise-focused, but very secure-fitting Bowers & Wilkins C5 In-Ear Headphones ($179.95, 4.5 stars), the XBA-S65 utilizes a flexible rubber loop that fits around the back of the outer ear. Once you've selected the right eartip size (it ships with four differently-sized pairs), you place the loop around the ear and slowly slide the adjuster near the earlobe to tighten the loop. This results in a very secure fit that can definitely hold up to rigorous exercise. Sony XBA-S65 diagram

As mentioned earlier, the earphones are sweat-proof and water-resistant, which means they can also be rinsed off. This excellent new feature was first seen in our previous Editors' Choice Sennheiser CX 680 Sports ($119.95, 4 stars) and is now available in the iSport, the XBA-S65, and some other new models.

One feature missing on the XBA-S65 is in-line controls for the iPhone or other smartphones. True, the inclusion of these controls would result in a price increase of roughly $30, but it would be nice to see it offered as an option. The white cable doesn't seem nearly as durable as the Polk Audio UltraFit3000's cable that features a Kevlar core. Along with the four eartip pairs, the XBA-S65 ships with a black plastic, slack-gathering cable length adjuster, a shirt clip, and a mesh carrying pouch.

Performance

Sony's new XBA line of balanced armature earphones—a first for the company which used to employ only dynamic drivers—provides a sound signature that puts a strong emphasis on the mids and highs where vocals, strings, and percussion are the dominant sounds. As a result, the XBA-S65 sounds excellent, with a response that is far more similar to the flat response of the Etymotic ER-4PT ($299, 4.5 stars) earphones than it is to the direct competition, like the iSport, which definitely focuses on the bass frequency realm. Both earphone pairs sound good in their own ways, but fans of crisp, articulate mids and highs will definitely prefer the XBA-S65. Consider it an audiophile-worthy, yet inexpensive, exercise earphone pair. That said, when you're exercising, you aren't necessarily doing critical listening, and even an audiophile might want some extra bass push to help motivate during strenuous workouts. The XBA-S65 isn't lacking in bass response, but it is not a pair that exaggerates the low-end like the iSport.  Additionally, the right size eartips will not only ensure a secure fit, but will make sure you're receiving optimal bass performance in each ear. However, if it's deep booming bass you're after, you won't find it here.

At high volumes, the XBA-S65 had no problem handling deep bass frequencies in songs like The Knife's "Silent Shout" without distorting. For those who read our Sony XBA-NC85D review, this may come as a surprise, as that is a $500 pair in the XBA lineup with significant distortion issues at high volumes. The difference, as evidenced in another noise-canceling option from Sony, the MDR-NC200D Digital Noise Canceling Headphones ($199, 3 stars) appears to be in the active noise cancellation circuitry itself, which seems to cause the distortion. The XBA-S65 has no active noise cancellation—although the eartips do passively block out some ambient noise—so this is not an issue. And yes, this $90 pair definitely outshines a $500 pair from the same line-up based on audio performance alone. Go figure.

On classical pieces, like John Adams' "The Chairman Dances," the strings and high percussion are bright and exceedingly clear. The lower register instruments are imbued with a subtle resonance that is pleasant and closer to accurate than most earphones in this range tend to aim for. On rock tracks, the kick drums tend to sound more punchy than thunderous, but again—this is a positive thing for those seeking flatter response earphones. Overall, the focus on mids and highs never approaches harsh, over-brightness that can cause ear fatigue over time, and the bass frequencies are never ignored, they just sit comfortably in the mix. This is probably the most accurate sound you will find in a sub-$100 exercise earphones.

Bass fiends who have a slightly higher budget will gravitate towards the Monster iSport's low-frequency-oriented sound. If you're not necessarily looking for an exercise pair, just one that fits well and provides excellent audio performance, the aforementioned Bowers & Wilkins C5 is an excellent option—though it is far more expensive. In the below-$100 range, only the AKG K 350 ($79.95, 4 stars) can really compete sonically with the Sony XBA-S65—it offers more low-end and a enjoyable overall response—and has the iPhone controls that would be a nice addition to the XBA-S65, but it's not an exercise-focused pair. For the price, it's hard to find a better-sounding pair of gym-friendly earphones than the Sony XBA-S65, and it earns our Editors' Choice for its strong value.

More Headphone Reviews:
•   Jabra Elite 65e
•   JBL Endurance Sprint
•   OnePlus Bullets Wireless
•   Marshall Major III Bluetooth
•   JBL Reflect Mini 2
•  more

Final Thoughts

PCMag is your complete guide to computers, peripherals and upgrades. We test and review tech products and services, report technology news and trends, and provide shopping advice with price comparisons. - Sony XBA-S65

The Latest Technology Product Reviews, News, Tips, and Deals

4.0 Excellent

Sony's XBA-S65 is an affordable, great-sounding, and extremely secure-fitting pair of moisture-resistant exercise earphones.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Tim Gideon

Tim Gideon

Contributing Editor, Audio

My Experience

I've been a contributing editor for PCMag since 2011. Before that, I was PCMag's lead audio analyst from 2006 to 2011. Even though I'm a freelancer now, PCMag has been my home for well over a decade, and audio gear reviews are still my primary focus. Prior to my career in reviewing tech, I worked as an audio engineer—my love of recording audio eventually led me to writing about audio gear.

My Areas of Expertise

  • Headphones and earphones
  • Wireless and computer speakers
  • USB mics
  • Bluetooth headsets

The Technology I Use

Probably because of their prevalence in the recording studios I worked in a long time ago, I am most comfortable on Macs—I'm writing this on the 2019 iMac I use for testing. I also have a MacBook Pro that gets plenty of similar use.

My workspace has a mini recording studio setup, and the the gear I work with there is a mix of items I've used forever (Paradigm Mini Monitors and a McIntosh stereo receiver) and newer gear I use for recording and review testing (such as the Universal Audio Apollo x16).

I'm obsessed with modern boutique analog synths—some of my favorites instruments in this realm are the Landscape Audio Stereo Field and HC-TT,  the Soma Enner, the Koma Field Kit, and the Lorre Mill Keyed Mosstone.

From my studio days, I'm comfortable using Pro Tools, and in recent years have branched out to other realms of creative software, like Adobe Premiere and After Effects.

I stream music, but I also still buy albums, digitally or on vinyl, and encourage anyone who wants fair compensation for musicians and engineers to do the same.

I also play lots of Wordle.

Read full bio