PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras
 & More »
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens - Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

The Sony E 16mm F2.8 was one of Sony's first mirrorless lenses. It's still on sale, but is in dire need of an update for use with modern cameras.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Very small and light.
    • Affordable.
    • Wide angle of view.
    • Dated optics.
    • Not sharp until f/5.6.
    • Limited to contrast focus.

Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 24
Dimensions 0.9 by 2.4 inches
Lens Mount Sony E
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 2.5

The Sony E 16mm F2.8 ($249.99) is one of the smallest and lightest lenses you can pair with an E-mount mirrorless camera. It's also the oldest still on sale, having been in the catalog since the system's 2010 debut. It wasn't a world-class lens then, and it looks worse today. Its image quality is middling at best, and it can't take full advantage of the advanced autofocus systems found in modern cameras. If you want a slim pancake, the E 20mm F2.8 is a better lens for $100 more, and the Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary is an Editors' Choice winner, albeit one that's pricier and larger.

Pancake Prime

The E 16mm F2.8 fits the definition of a pancake lens, one that barely juts out from the camera body when mounted. It measures 0.9 by 2.4 inches (HW), weighs just 2.4 ounces, and has a thread for 49mm filters. The lens is finished in silver, and the barrel is lightweight metal.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

Sony doesn't include a hood, and I didn't use one when testing the lens. I did notice some flare in shots that might have been lessened by using one, as you can see in the image above. You can use the ALC-SH112 hood, which is bundled with the E 35mm F1.8 OSS and some others.

The lens is designed for Sony cameras with APS-C image sensors, where it matches the angle of view of a 24mm lens. You can pair it with a full-frame body and use it in a cropped mode, which does cut into image resolution. If you try to capture full-frame images, you'll see a big black border around the frame, as shown below.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

In addition to standard filters, the lens can work with the Ultra-Wide Converter ($159.99), which broadens its angle of view to match an 18mm prime, and there is also a VCL-ECF2 Fisheye Converter ($179.99). Both of these converters also work with the E 20mm F2.8.

The only control of note is a manual focus ring, at the front of the barrel. It turns comfortably, with a little bit of resistance. The manual focus is electronic, and its response changes based on how quickly you turn the ring.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

Turn slowly and you'll make minute adjustments, while a quick twist is used to move from one extreme to the other quickly. The magnification and focus peaking aids built into Sony cameras make manual focus a pleasant experience for photography, though videographers will miss the ability to recreate focus pulls from take to take—the lens isn't well suited for that specific task.

Autofocus is another matter. The latest cameras offer hybrid focus systems that use phase detection, but the 16mm doesn't support the technology. It's limited to contrast focus, which is quick and accurate when it comes to snapping images with single-shot focus (AF-S). But if you switch to AF-C, the experience isn't the same. The live feed constantly wobbles in and out of focus, which is disconcerting to see in the viewfinder. You'll still get in-focus shots, though.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

Focus is available as close as 9.5 inches. When coupled with the wide angle of view, it gives the lens a very paltry 1:12.8 magnification ratio at its closest focus point. This isn't one for close-up shots.

There's no image stabilization in the lens. Sony sells one stabilized APS-C body at this point, the a6500. Pairing the lens with a stabilized body will smooth handheld video and makes it easier to snap handheld shots at longer exposure times. We tested the lens with the a6400, which doesn't offer stabilization.

Problems Resolving Detail

The a6400 is a 24MP camera, a lot more demanding on a lens than the 14.2MP NEX-3 with which the 16mm F2.8 debuted. I tested the 16mm along with Imatest to check its optical performance with a modern camera.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

At f/2.8 it scores 1,432 lines on a center-weighted sharpness test. The very center of the frame puts up a good 2,143 lines, but it gives way to blurry results very quickly. We see fewer than 1,000 lines just outside the center, which explains the low average.

The lens gets better at f/4, where the average climbs to a good 2,097 lines. Keep in mind that the sharpest parts of your image will still be at the center, and there is definitely some softness as you move away.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

At f/5.6 the lens finally delivers results that are sharp beyond just the center. The average score is a strong 2,867 lines, with outstanding center resolution and good results up to the edges of the shot. Shoot here, at f/8 (2,781 lines), or f/11 (2,610 lines) for landscape images.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Diffraction is a concern at narrower f-stops. You should skip shooting at f/16 (2,046 lines) and f/22 (1,301 lines).

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

There is some distortion, about 1.3 percent with a mustache pattern. Mustache distortion isn't what happens when Tom Selleck gets a bad shave at the barber—it's a more complex pattern that shows a bit of barrel distortion at the center of the frame and a pincushion effect toward the edges. Thankfully it's a pretty modest amount.

Likewise, there's a little vignette when shooting wide open, about a -1.6EV drop at the corners of the frame. But it's a modest amount and is gone at narrower apertures.

Time for an Update

Sony has paid a lot of attention to its full-frame system since its 2013 debut, sometimes to the detriment of its more compact APS-C system, which uses the same lens mount. The E 16mm F2.8 is a victim of neglect—a lens designed when mirrorless cameras were in their infancy, and one that has long been available at a price point trending toward budget.

Sony E 16mm F2.8 : Sample Image

We've seen what Sony's biggest rival in the APS-C space, Fujifilm, has offered its user base with this year's Fujinon XF 16mm F2.8 R WR. But you can't use a Fujifilm lens on a Sony camera, or vice versa.

If you're invested in the E-mount system, Sony instead offers the slightly pricier, and even slimmer, E 20mm F2.8, to photographers looking for a small, but high-quality, wide lens. It's not quite as wide, of course. If you find its angle restrictive, and aren't shopping for a pancake lens specifically, the Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary is a terrific alternative for the Sony system, and our Editors' Choice.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens - Sony SEL16F28 16mm f/2.8 Wide-Angle Lens

Sony E 16mm F2.8 Review

2.5 Fair

The Sony E 16mm F2.8 was one of Sony's first mirrorless lenses. It's still on sale, but is in dire need of an update for use with modern cameras.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Experts

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio