PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Facebook Alters Safety Check to Improve Accuracy

Algorithms will be more selective in which users are asked to mark themselves safe during a disaster.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

After several recent missteps with its Safety Check feature, Facebook today announced that it would make changes to how members are notified that friends in disaster areas are safe.

During a disaster like a flood or mass shooting, Facebook will take note of which users in the affected area use Safety Check to mark themselves safe, and then prompt their friends who may be nearby to also check in using the feature. That could help avoid situations like a bombing in Lahore, Pakistan, in March, during which Facebook accidentally prompted users who were nowhere near the city to check in safe.

The changes are part of an ongoing effort to make Safety Check more responsive to the needs of a community in crisis. Facebook was criticized after it activated the feature for bombings in Paris last fall, but not for other similar bombings in the Middle East. In response, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that the feature would be rolled out to all major disasters.

That has meant a much more frequently activated service. Between January and May 2016, Safety Check was turned on 17 times, compared with 11 times in 2014 and 2015 combined, according to Facebook engineer Peter Cottle.

"As our efforts ramped up, the team began solving the technical challenges associated with more consistent and frequent activations," Cottle explained in a blog post. "To create a system that we can launch anywhere at a moment's notice, we scaled our infrastructure to handle larger events more efficiently and automated many of the manual steps previously required for activation."

The user-initiated check-in prompts announced today are a significant modification to that automated process, which may have contributed to the mistaken notification prompts sent to users in areas unaffected by crisis.

Cottle wrote that the company will be testing more "new ways for the community to initiate and spread Safety Check" in the next few weeks.

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio