PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

FCC to Fine AT&T $100M Over 'Unlimited' Data Throttling

 & Chloe Albanesius Executive Editor, News

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The Federal Communications Commission today said it will fine AT&T $100 million for failing to adequately explain to customers of its "unlimited" data plans just how much their service would be throttled after a certain amount of data use.

AT&T started offering unlimited data plans in 2007, but as data usage exploded, it phased them out. Existing users were (and still are) grandfathered into unlimited plans, but AT&T announced in 2011 that it would throttle "unlimited" customers who used excessive amounts of data in a given time period. Specifically, 4G LTE users were capped after 5GB of use during a billing cycle, while those on 3G and other 4G networks got throttled after 3GB of use.

The FCC charges that throttled speeds "were orders of magnitude slower than the normal network speeds AT&T advertises"—5 Mbps to 12 Mbps on 4G LTE compared to 512 kbps or less when throttled.

AT&T ThrottlingAT&T informed customers about the policy via press releases, bill inserts, and warning text messages (right). But "although nearly four years have passed since [throttling] was implemented and since customers supposedly were fully informed about the policy, the Commission continues to receive a steady stream of complaints from AT&T unlimited plan customers who were surprised about having their speeds reduced," the FCC said today.

This, according to the commission, is a violation of the FCC's 2010 Open Internet transparency rule (the part of its net neutrality rules that was not struck down by the court).

More recently, AT&T said it will only throttle those who have exceeded the 3GB or 5GB cap during peak times.

The $100 million is a proposed fine. FCC officials said today that AT&T will have time to review and respond to the FCC's proposal, after which the commission will issue a final decision.

In a statement, an AT&T spokesman said that the company "will vigorously dispute the FCC's assertions."

"The FCC has specifically identified this practice as a legitimate and reasonable way to manage network resources for the benefit of all customers, and has known for years that all of the major carriers use it," AT&T said. "We have been fully transparent with our customers, providing notice in multiple ways and going well beyond the FCC's disclosure requirements."

In October, however, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued AT&T for misleading customers with its unlimited plans.

"Consumers deserve to get what they pay for," FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said in a statement. "Broadband providers must be upfront and transparent about the services they provide. The FCC will not stand idly by while consumers are deceived by misleading marketing materials and insufficient disclosure."

The FCC's Republican commissioners are not backing their colleagues' decision. Commissioner Michael O'Rielly said the Open Internet rule "does not specifically require the disclosure of exact speeds provided under congestion management policies," while Commission Ajit Pai says the FCC is just ignoring the disclosures AT&T did make.

About Our Expert

Chloe Albanesius

Chloe Albanesius

Executive Editor, News

My Experience

I started out covering tech policy in DC for The National Journal, where my beat included state-level tech news and all the congressional hearings and FCC meetings I could handle. I later covered Wall Street trading tech before switching gears to consumer tech. I now lead PCMag's news coverage.

My Areas of Expertise

Getting my start in DC means I still have a soft spot for tech policy; Congressional hearings can sometimes be as entertaining as a Bravo reality show, for better or worse. But PCMag is all about the technology we use every day, as well as keeping an eye out for the trends that will shape the industry in the years ahead (or flop on arrival). I've covered the rise of social media, the iOS vs. Android wars, the cord-cutting revolution that's now left us with hefty streaming bills, and the effort to stuff artificial intelligence into every product you could imagine. This job has taken me to CES in Vegas (one too many times), IFA in Berlin, and MWC in Barcelona. I also drove a Tesla 1,000 miles out west as part of our Best Mobile Networks project. Of late, my focus is on our hard-working team of reporters at PCMag, guiding and editing their robust coverage.

Read full bio