PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Kodak i2400

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Kodak i2400 - Kodak i2400
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Kodak i2400 scans at close to its rated 30 pages per minute, it offers duplex (two-sided) scanning, and it comes with both OCR and document management programs.

Pros & Cons

    • Fast.
    • Duplex (two-sided) scanning.
    • Comes with OCR and document management software.
    • Some options in the driver are unnecessarily unclear.

Kodak i2400 Specs

Automatic Document Feeder: Yes
Ethernet Interface: No
Flatbed: No
Maximum Optical Resolution: 600 pixels
Maximum Scan Area: Legal
Mechanical Resolution: 1200 pixels
One-Touch Buttons: Yes
Scanning Options: Reflective
USB or FireWire Interface: USB

Although the Kodak i2400 ($845 direct) is a bit larger than typical scanners for individual use, and Kodak calls it a workgroup scanner, it's just as appropriate for an individual with heavy-duty scanning needs as for a small office or workgroup. It delivers the right set of features for all of these potential uses, with fast speed, duplex (two sided) scanning, and simple options for document management, editing documents, and sending scans by email. The combination is more than enough to make it an attractive choice.

The i2400 is a close match in many ways to the Editors' Choice Canon DR-2580C ($875 street, 4.5 stars). Not so incidentally, if you look at the DR-2580C review, you may notice that I reviewed it some years ago, in 2005. But don't discount it because of its age. Document scanners haven't changed much. The DR-2580C still holds up against the competition, and still fully qualifies as Editors' Choice. (It also comes with more software now than it did when I reviewed it.) The i2400 is a serious challenger, though, and depending on your needs, may even be the better fit.

Basics

Setting up the i2400 is standard fare. One unusual touch, however, is that the scanner comes in what Kodak calls its storage position, with the trays closed and the scanner itself in a vertical position. Before you can use it, you have to rotate the body so it's at an angle to the base instead of straight up and down, and then optionally pull out the trays. When you're not using it, however, you can return it to the storage position, with a footprint of only 13 inches wide by 6.3 inches deep. This little trick goes a long way towards making the scanner a comfortable fit for a desktop.

Note too that you can also add one of two flatbeds as a separate, companion scanner add-on. At this writing, the only choice is the letter-size version ($495 direct), but Kodak says that a tabloid-size (11- by 17- inch) version ($1,428 direct) will also be available, probably by the time this is published.

Kodak bundles a highly useful selection of software with the i2400, with capable programs for document management (Nuance PaperPort 12) and optical character recognition (Nuance OmniPage 17). In addition, the Twain, ISIS, and WIA drivers will, between them, let you scan directly from virtually any Windows program that includes a scan command.

Also included are two scan utilities, one that installs along with the drivers and one that installs from a separate disc. Unfortunately, this is more confusing than helpful, since it's not obvious why you might use one or the other. Worse, the disc sleeve for the second utility refers to a Software Overview Guide that's supposed to help you choose between them, but the Guide wasn't packed with the scanner. Kodak says the guide is actually available online, and the company is planning to fix the misstatement on the disc sleeve.

For my purposes, I took a look at both utilities. For my official testing, however, I stayed with the one that installs with the drivers, since it's effectively the default choice. All of my comments here, and all of my results, are based on that default utility. Note that the best one to use really depends on which one you prefer using for your particular scan applications.

Performance

Kodak rates the i2400 at 30 pages per minute (ppm) and 60 images per minute (ipm) for duplex scanning, with one image on each side of the page, at the default 200 pixel per inch (ppi) resolution in black white mode. That's a bit faster than the DR-2580C's rating of 25 ppm and 50 ipm. In my tests, however, the i2400 turned out to be both faster and slower than the Canon scanner.

The Kodak scanner was faster for scanning to a PDF image file. For simplex scanning, I clocked it at 28.3 ppm, close to its rated speed. For duplex scanning, it came in at 53.6 ipm. That makes it a little faster than the Canon scanner, at 25.4 ppm for simplex scans and 49.1 ipm for duplex.

For scanning to a searchable PDF file, however, the Canon scanner has the advantage, because it doesn't slow down at all to recognize the text. For our 25-sheet (50 image) test document, the DR-2850C took just 1 minute 1 second. The i2400 took 1:34. Which one will be faster for your real world scans, in short, depends on the format you need to scan to.

That said, keep in mind that the i2400 isn't all that slow even with the text recognition step added, so don't take this particular speed comparison too seriously. The 40 ppm, 80 ipm Canon imageFormula DR-3010C ($800 street, 4 stars), for example, was only slightly faster than the i2400 for scanning and OCRing the file, at 1:28.

Finally for performance, the i2400 also did reasonably well in our OCR tests, reading both our Times New Roman and Arial test pages at 10-point size without a mistake.

Other Issues

The one complaint I have with the i2400 is that too many options in the driver aren't self explanatory. For example, I was looking for a way to scan in duplex, but have the scanner ignore blank pages, so I could scan both one-sided and two-sided documents without having to change settings. I had almost concluded there was no such option, when I saw a setting labeled Blank Image, with two choices under it. I took a guess that Based on Content might be what I was looking for, and I turned out to be right. But I'd argue that the terminology is unnecessarily obscure. A better name for the setting would be Ignore Blank Pages.

The good news is that once you puzzle out the meanings (or read through the help screens for each driver tab) you'll find a rich selection of scanning options. That counts as another plus to go along with the fast speed, OCR accuracy, and bundled application programs. The Canon DR-2850C still edges the i2400 out for Editors' Choice, mostly because it can recognize text without slowing down. However, the Kodak i2400 is a close second, and—particularly if you scan primarily to image format—it may even be your preferred scanner.

More Scanner Reviews:
•   Epson DS-410 Document Scanner
•   Epson DS-320 Portable Duplex Document Scanner With ADF
•   HP ScanJet Enterprise Flow N9120 fn2 Document Scanner
•   Epson WorkForce DS-770 Color Document Scanner
•   Panasonic KV-S1026C-MKII
•  more

Final Thoughts

Kodak i2400 - Kodak i2400

Kodak i2400

4.0 Excellent

The Kodak i2400 scans at close to its rated 30 pages per minute, it offers duplex (two-sided) scanning, and it comes with both OCR and document management programs.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio