PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Ricoh AC104

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - All-in-One Printers
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

The Ricoh AC104 AIO has lots of desirable features, including an automatic document feeder and built-in fax modem, but it just misses the right balance among speed, output quality, and price. If it delivered better speed and quality or cost $150 to $200 less, it would be a much more attractive choice.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Serves as a laser printer, color scanner, standalone copier, and standalone fax machine.
    • 30-sheet ADF.
    • Excellent text quality.
    • Relatively slow for the price.
    • Copies and faxes from front panel only.
    • Graphics and photo quality are both at the low end for monochrome lasers.

Ricoh AC104 Specs

Maximum Scan Area: 8.5" x 14"
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Printer Category: Laser
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Mono): 17 ppm
Scanner Optical Resolution: 600 pixels per inch
Scanner Type: Flatbed with ADF (Standard or Optional)
Standalone Copier and Fax: Copier
Standalone Copier and Fax: Fax
Type: All-In-One

If you're in the market for a laser-based personal AIO or an AIO for a small office or workgroup, Ricoh's AC104 is aimed at you. It doesn't quite hit the target, though, despite an assortment of highly welcome features, including a 30-page automatic document feeder (ADF), a built-in 33.6-Kbps fax modem, and the ability to function as a standalone fax machine and copier.

At 16.4 by 18.7 by 17.2 inches (HWD) and 28.8 pounds, the AC104 is a little too large to share your desk comfortably. Unless you plan to use it strictly as a fax machine and copier, however, you'll have to keep it near some computer, since it doesn't have a network port. We tested using a USB connection.

The 17-ppm engine in the AC104 is relatively slow by today's standards. On our tests (using QualityLogic's testing software and equipment, www.qualitylogic.com), however, the printer proved even slower than we expected. The total time on our business applications suite was 14 minutes 13 seconds. By comparison, the $500 Canon ImageClass MF-5500 ran the same tests in 9:01.

Text quality is a bright spot. We rated the AC104 as excellent, with more than half the fonts we test with easily readable at 4 points. On tests of both graphics and photos, however, it managed only a fair ranking because of visible dithering and other flaws. It's not unusual for a monochrome laser to score only fair on graphics or photos, but few score as low as the AC104 did on both. The Canon MF-5500, on the other hand, earned a rating of good on both tests.

The AC104's other functions work as promised for scanning, copying, and faxing. It has no bundled utility to let you fax from a program, however. If you want to fax a Microsoft Word file, for example, and you don't have a fax program, you can't simply chose File | Print, and then choose the fax driver. Instead, you have to print the file, then scan and fax it, which is clumsy to say the least.

Aside from this oversight, there's nothing really wrong with the AC104. If it were, say, $200 less, it would be well worth considering. At its current price, however, it makes more sense to get the Canon MF-5500.

Sub-ratings:
Text:
Graphics:
Photos:

More multifunction printer reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - All-in-One Printers

Ricoh AC104

2.5 Fair

The Ricoh AC104 AIO has lots of desirable features, including an automatic document feeder and built-in fax modem, but it just misses the right balance among speed, output quality, and price. If it delivered better speed and quality or cost $150 to $200 less, it would be a much more attractive choice.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio