PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Elmo BOXi T-200 Review

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Elmo BOXi T-200 projector delivers good image quality and a rated 150 lumens in a highly portable package, but if you can't connect to its sole HDMI port, you can't use it. - Elmo BOXi T-200
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Elmo BOXi T-200 projector delivers good image quality and a rated 150 lumens in a highly portable package, but if you can't connect to its sole HDMI port, you can't use it.
Best Deal£374.32

Buy It Now

£374.32

Pros & Cons

    • Highly portable.
    • Good image quality.
    • WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution.
    • Comes with HDMI cable.
    • HDMI is the only connection choice.

Elmo BOXi T-200 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness 150
Warranty 12
Weight 0.7

The Elmo BOXi T-200 ($429) is unusual in that its only connection is an HDMI port, a trait it shares with only a few other portable projectors, including the 3M Mobile Projector MP300($189.99 at Amazon). With good image quality, WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution, and a 150-lumen brightness rating, it's a potentially good choice if you can connect to it. Otherwise, it's useless.

With HDMI as the only port on the T-200( at Amazon), you may not be able to use it with every image source, particularly if one of those sources is an older computer. The newer your system, the more likely it is to include an HDMI port. You can also get adapters that will let you connect to sources with a DisplayPort, an Apple Lightning port, or a DVI-I or DVI-D port. In addition, you can connect to a Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)-capable smartphone or tablet, but because the T-200's HDMI port does not support MHL, you'll need an adapter that can plug into the device, the projector, and a power source.

Basics and Setup

Portability is one of the stronger arguments for the T-200. It measures just 1.4 by 3.7 by 6.0 inches (HWD), and seems a bit smaller, thanks to the slimming effects of a black chassis and rounded edges in front and back. It weighs just 11 ounces by itself or 1 pound, 7 ounces if you include the power block and cord. There is no battery.

Like most projectors in this weight class, the T-200 is built around a DLP chip paired with an LED light source meant to last the life of the unit. Elmo rates the light source at 20,000 hours.

Setup is simple. Plug in a cable, point the projector at whatever you're using for a screen, and focus the image. As with most models this size, there's no zoom, so the only way to adjust image size is to move the projector closer or further from the screen. One noteworthy touch is the shorter-than-typical throw—although it's still in the range of a standard-throw lens. I measured the image at 41 inches wide (49 inches, diagonally), with the projector just 41 inches from the screen. The side panel includes a USB Type A port, but its only function is to let you supply power to a USB device.

Brightness

Elmo rates the T-200 at 150 lumens. That's half the 300-lumen rating of the Editors' Choice 3M Mobile Projector MP410, but the perception of brightness is logarithmic, which means that a 300-lumen image at any given size will be a lot less than twice as bright as a 150-lumen image.

Based on the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, a 150-lumen image with a 1.0-gain screen is suitable for roughly a 45- to 60-inch (diagonal) image at a 16:10 aspect ratio in theater dark lighting. With moderate ambient light it's suitable for roughly a 30- to 35-inch image. For my tests, I settled on a 50-inch (diagonal) image for comfortable viewing with the lights out, as well as for shorter sessions with the lights on.

Image Quality

On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, the T-200 handed in good, but not excellent, scores for image quality, which is about the best you can expect for projectors in this category. Color quality is a bit of problem, with colors varying significantly from one preset mode to the next. Blue and red, for example, were well-saturated in some modes in my tests, but edging toward pastel in others.

More important for most data images is that the projector does an acceptable job with detail. Like all of its close competition, the T-200 uses a DLP chip that's designed to increase brightness, but also introduces apparent scaling artifacts. These show most clearly as unwanted extra patterns in areas of closely spaced lines or dots. They also tend to give images a soft-focus effect. The T-200 holds detail reasonably well in spite of this issue. In my tests, black text on white was crisp and readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points. White text on black was readable at sizes as small as 9.0 points.

Video quality also counts as a plus. I saw a hint of posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually) and a slight loss of shadow detail (details based in shading in dark areas), but only in clips that tend to cause those problems. Beyond that, the T-200 handled skin tones well and also did well with color quality in general.

It also helps that the projector does a better job of avoiding rainbow artifacts (red-green-blue flashes) than many DLP projectors. With data images, I saw very few rainbow effects. With video, I saw them more often, but still infrequently enough that even if you see them easily, you might not find them annoying.

One pleasant surprise, finally, is that the one-watt speaker is unusually capable, despite a tendency to over-modulate if you crank up the volume all the way. When I backed off just a little from the top setting, the quality was good enough so I could make out some softly spoken dialogue that gets garbled with many projectors, and the volume was still high enough for a small room. There's also an audio output on the side panel if you want to use headphones or an external sound system.

If you need a brighter image, need to connect to a VGA port, or want to show images from a USB memory key or microSD card, you'll be better off with the Editors' Choice 3M MP410 or another projector that offers those features. However, if an HDMI connection is all you need for the image sources you want to use, the Elmo BOXi T-200 offers a usefully bright image, good image quality, and even a decent sound system in a highly portable package that's both light and easy to set up. The combination makes it worth considering.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The Elmo BOXi T-200 projector delivers good image quality and a rated 150 lumens in a highly portable package, but if you can't connect to its sole HDMI port, you can't use it. - Elmo BOXi T-200

Elmo BOXi T-200 Review

3.0 Average

The Elmo BOXi T-200 projector delivers good image quality and a rated 150 lumens in a highly portable package, but if you can't connect to its sole HDMI port, you can't use it.

Get It Now
Best Deal£374.32

Buy It Now

£374.32

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio